Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you're studying circular economy business models, you're really being tested on your ability to recognize how companies redesign value chains to eliminate waste and keep materials in productive use. These case studies aren't just feel-good sustainability stories—they represent distinct strategic approaches that exam questions will ask you to identify, compare, and evaluate. You'll need to understand the mechanisms behind product-as-a-service models, remanufacturing systems, industrial symbiosis, and design-for-longevity strategies.
Don't just memorize company names and what they do. Instead, focus on which circular principle each case demonstrates and why that approach works for that particular industry. An FRQ might ask you to recommend a circular strategy for a hypothetical company—and your answer should draw on these models as evidence. Know the underlying logic: Who retains ownership? Where do materials flow? What incentive structures drive behavior change?
These companies retain ownership of physical products and sell access or outcomes instead. By keeping ownership, manufacturers have strong incentives to design for durability, repairability, and eventual recovery.
Compare: Philips vs. Mud Jeans—both use product-as-a-service to retain material control, but Philips targets B2B clients with performance contracts while Mud Jeans applies the model to fast-moving consumer goods. If an FRQ asks about adapting circular models across industries, contrast these two.
Remanufacturing restores used products to original specifications, capturing the embedded energy and materials that would otherwise be lost. This approach works best for durable goods with high material value and standardized components.
Compare: Renault vs. Caterpillar—both remanufacture at industrial scale, but Caterpillar's core deposit system creates stronger return incentives. Note how both target industries with expensive, durable components where remanufacturing economics clearly beat virgin production.
These models prioritize extending product life through repairability, modularity, and resale infrastructure. The key insight: the most sustainable product is often the one that already exists.
Compare: Patagonia vs. Fairphone—both extend product life, but through different mechanisms. Patagonia retrofits repair onto existing products while Fairphone designs modularity in from the start. Use Fairphone when discussing design-phase interventions and Patagonia for post-purchase circular strategies.
These models create networks where one organization's waste becomes another's input. Industrial symbiosis requires geographic proximity, trust between partners, and compatible material flows.
Compare: Kalundborg vs. Ellen MacArthur Foundation cities—Kalundborg demonstrates bottom-up, industry-led symbiosis while the Foundation promotes top-down, policy-enabled transitions. Both show that circular economy requires systems-level coordination, not just individual company action.
These models capture value from waste streams that would otherwise end up in landfills. Success depends on aggregating sufficient volume and finding higher-value applications for recovered materials.
Compare: Interface vs. TerraCycle—Interface controls its own material loop while TerraCycle creates loops for products other companies make. Interface represents vertical integration of circularity; TerraCycle shows how third-party specialists can enable circular outcomes across industries.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Product-as-a-Service | Philips Pay-per-lux, Mud Jeans Lease A Jeans |
| Remanufacturing | Renault Choisy-le-Roi, Caterpillar Reman |
| Design for Repair/Longevity | Fairphone modular design, Patagonia Worn Wear |
| Industrial Symbiosis | Kalundborg Symbiosis, Ellen MacArthur Foundation Cities |
| Closed-Loop Recycling | Interface Mission Zero, TerraCycle partnerships |
| Consumer Behavior Change | Patagonia Worn Wear, Mud Jeans |
| B2B Circular Models | Philips, Caterpillar, Kalundborg |
| Ethical/Social Integration | Fairphone (supply chain), Interface Net-Works |
Which two case studies best illustrate the product-as-a-service model, and what key difference exists in their target markets?
Compare and contrast Renault's remanufacturing plant and Fairphone's modular design—both extend product life, but at what stage of the product lifecycle does each intervene?
If an FRQ asked you to recommend a circular strategy for a consumer packaged goods company, which case study provides the most relevant model and why?
What distinguishes industrial symbiosis (like Kalundborg) from closed-loop recycling (like Interface)? Identify the key structural difference in how materials flow.
A company wants to shift consumer behavior toward more sustainable consumption without changing its core product design. Which two case studies offer the best templates, and what mechanisms do they use to change behavior?