Why This Matters
Business models aren't just abstract frameworks—they're the fundamental architecture that determines whether your startup survives or fails. When you're tested on entrepreneurship concepts, you're expected to understand how companies create value, how they capture revenue, and why certain models work for specific market conditions. The difference between a subscription model and a freemium model isn't just semantics; it reflects entirely different assumptions about customer acquisition costs, lifetime value, and competitive positioning.
Don't just memorize the names of these models. Know what revenue mechanism each one uses, what customer relationship it builds, and when an entrepreneur should choose one over another. Exam questions—especially FRQs—will ask you to recommend a business model for a given scenario or explain why a startup pivoted from one model to another. Understanding the underlying logic gives you the analytical tools to answer confidently.
Recurring Revenue Models
These models prioritize predictable cash flow and long-term customer relationships over one-time transactions. The core mechanism is converting customers into ongoing revenue streams, reducing acquisition costs over time and increasing customer lifetime value (CLV).
Subscription Model
- Recurring payments create predictable revenue—customers pay weekly, monthly, or annually for continued access to products or services
- Customer retention becomes the key metric—churn rate directly impacts profitability, making onboarding and engagement critical
- High switching costs build competitive moats—once customers integrate a subscription into their routines, they're less likely to leave
Software as a Service (SaaS)
- Cloud-hosted software eliminates installation friction—users access applications via browser, reducing IT burden and enabling rapid deployment
- Continuous updates replace version releases—companies can iterate quickly and push improvements without customer action
- Scalability drives margin expansion—adding users costs relatively little once infrastructure exists, creating powerful unit economics
Razor and Blade Model
- Low-cost initial product hooks customers—the "razor" is sold at or below cost to establish the relationship
- High-margin consumables generate ongoing revenue—"blades" (ink cartridges, coffee pods, replacement parts) drive profitability
- Lock-in effects discourage switching—proprietary consumables create dependency on the original ecosystem
Compare: Subscription Model vs. Razor and Blade—both generate recurring revenue, but subscriptions charge for access while razor-and-blade charges for consumables. If an FRQ asks about hardware startups, razor-and-blade is often your best example.
These models derive value from connecting multiple user groups and benefit from network effects—the phenomenon where each additional user increases the platform's value for all other users.
Marketplace Model
- Two-sided platforms connect buyers and sellers—the business facilitates transactions rather than holding inventory
- Revenue comes from transaction fees or commissions—typically 10-30% of each sale, varying by industry
- Network effects create winner-take-all dynamics—more sellers attract more buyers, which attracts more sellers, compounding growth
- User-generated content drives value creation—the platform provides infrastructure while users provide the actual content or services
- Multiple revenue streams are possible—transaction fees, subscriptions, advertising, or premium features can all coexist
- Critical mass is essential for viability—platforms must reach sufficient user density before network effects kick in
Sharing Economy Model
- Peer-to-peer transactions unlock underutilized assets—homes, cars, tools, and skills can generate income for owners
- Trust mechanisms replace traditional gatekeepers—ratings, reviews, and verification systems enable transactions between strangers
- Lower capital requirements benefit both sides—providers monetize existing assets; consumers access goods without ownership costs
Compare: Marketplace vs. Sharing Economy—both connect users for transactions, but marketplaces typically involve ownership transfer while sharing economy involves temporary access. Think Etsy (marketplace) vs. Airbnb (sharing economy).
User Acquisition Models
These models prioritize rapid user growth by removing barriers to entry, then convert engagement into revenue through various mechanisms. The strategy is to build audience first, monetize second.
Freemium Model
- Free tier eliminates adoption friction—users can experience core value without financial commitment
- Premium features target power users—advanced functionality, increased limits, or ad-free experiences justify payment
- Conversion rate is the critical metric—typically 2-5% of free users convert, so massive scale is required for profitability
Advertising Model
- Free services attract large audiences—users pay with attention rather than money
- User data enables targeted advertising—behavioral analytics allow precise ad placement, increasing advertiser willingness to pay
- Engagement metrics drive revenue—time on platform, click-through rates, and daily active users directly impact ad rates
Affiliate Marketing Model
- Performance-based compensation aligns incentives—affiliates only earn when they generate actual sales or leads
- Content creators and influencers extend reach—brands access established audiences without building them from scratch
- Low risk for merchants—payment occurs after revenue is generated, eliminating upfront marketing costs
Compare: Freemium vs. Advertising—both offer free core services, but freemium monetizes the user directly through upgrades while advertising monetizes user attention through third parties. Freemium works when users have high willingness to pay; advertising works when users won't pay but will tolerate ads.
Direct Transaction Models
These models involve straightforward exchanges between businesses and customers, with revenue generated through sales margins rather than platform fees or subscriptions.
E-commerce Model
- Digital storefronts enable global reach—businesses can sell to anyone with internet access, eliminating geographic constraints
- Multiple relationship types are possible—B2C (business-to-consumer), B2B (business-to-business), and C2C (consumer-to-consumer) all operate online
- Customer acquisition cost is the key challenge—digital marketing, SEO, and conversion optimization determine profitability
Direct Sales Model
- Personal relationships drive transactions—salespeople build trust through face-to-face or one-on-one interactions
- Lower overhead than retail distribution—no storefront costs, though commission structures can be significant
- Network-based expansion is possible—multi-level structures allow salespeople to earn from their recruits' sales
Franchise Model
- Proven systems reduce startup risk—franchisees receive established brand recognition, operational playbooks, and ongoing support
- Initial fees plus ongoing royalties structure payments—franchisees typically pay 4-8% of gross revenue to franchisors
- Standardization enables rapid scaling—consistent customer experience across locations builds brand equity
Compare: E-commerce vs. Direct Sales—both sell products without traditional retail, but e-commerce relies on digital marketing and automation while direct sales relies on personal relationships and networks. E-commerce scales more easily; direct sales often achieves higher conversion rates.
Operational Strategy Models
These models describe how startups operate and grow rather than how they generate revenue. They're often combined with other business models.
On-Demand Model
- Instant gratification meets customer expectations—technology enables real-time matching of supply and demand
- Gig workers provide flexible capacity—variable labor costs scale with demand, reducing fixed overhead
- Logistics and technology are core competencies—success depends on efficient routing, payment processing, and user experience
Crowdfunding Model
- Pre-launch validation reduces risk—campaigns test market demand before significant investment in production
- Early customers become brand advocates—backers have emotional investment in the product's success
- Multiple structures exist—reward-based (Kickstarter), equity-based (Republic), and debt-based (Kiva) serve different needs
Lean Startup Model
- Minimum viable products (MVPs) test assumptions—build the simplest version that delivers core value, then iterate
- Validated learning replaces speculation—customer feedback and data drive decisions, not founder intuition
- Pivot or persevere decisions are systematic—regular assessment determines whether to change direction or double down
Compare: Crowdfunding vs. Lean Startup—both emphasize early customer engagement, but crowdfunding focuses on raising capital and validating demand while lean startup focuses on iterating the product through feedback. Many startups use both: crowdfund to validate, then apply lean principles to develop.
Quick Reference Table
|
| Recurring Revenue | Subscription, SaaS, Razor and Blade |
| Network Effects | Marketplace, Platform, Sharing Economy |
| Free User Acquisition | Freemium, Advertising, Affiliate Marketing |
| Direct Sales Channels | E-commerce, Direct Sales, Franchise |
| Customer Lock-In | SaaS, Razor and Blade, Subscription |
| Low Capital Requirements | Affiliate Marketing, Crowdfunding, Sharing Economy |
| Scalability | SaaS, Platform, E-commerce |
| Risk Reduction | Franchise, Lean Startup, Crowdfunding |
Self-Check Questions
-
Which two business models both rely on network effects to create value, and how do they differ in what users exchange on the platform?
-
A startup wants predictable monthly revenue but sells physical products, not software. Compare the subscription model and the razor-and-blade model—which would you recommend and why?
-
Explain why a freemium model might fail for a B2B software company but succeed for a consumer app. What metric determines success in each case?
-
If an FRQ describes a founder who wants to test market demand before investing in manufacturing, which two models would you recommend they combine, and how would each contribute to reducing risk?
-
Compare the franchise model and the lean startup model in terms of their approach to risk, standardization, and innovation. When would an entrepreneur choose each?