Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
These case studies aren't just cautionary tales—they're the foundation for understanding how ethical failures actually unfold in corporate environments. You're being tested on your ability to identify which ethical principles were violated, what systemic factors enabled the misconduct, and how stakeholders were harmed. Exams will ask you to analyze cases through frameworks like stakeholder theory, utilitarianism, deontological ethics, and corporate social responsibility. Each scandal illustrates specific mechanisms: fraudulent accounting, deceptive marketing, toxic corporate culture, or failures of governance.
Don't just memorize company names and fines—know what concept each case best illustrates. When an FRQ asks about fiduciary duty, you should immediately think Enron or Tyco. When it asks about informed consent, Cambridge Analytica should come to mind. The cases below are grouped by the type of ethical failure they represent, which is exactly how exam questions will frame them.
These cases demonstrate what happens when companies deceive investors and regulators through deliberate misrepresentation of financial health. The core mechanism is the same: executives manipulate numbers to inflate perceived value, enriching themselves while destroying stakeholder trust.
Compare: Enron vs. WorldCom—both involved accounting fraud that destroyed shareholder value, but Enron's fraud was about hiding liabilities while WorldCom's was about inflating assets. If an FRQ asks about post-scandal regulatory reform, both lead directly to Sarbanes-Oxley.
These cases involve companies deliberately misleading consumers or regulators about product safety, performance, or practices. The ethical violation centers on informed consent—stakeholders couldn't make rational decisions because they were given false information.
Compare: Volkswagen vs. Theranos—both involved systematic deception about product capabilities, but VW deceived regulators while Theranos deceived investors and patients. Use Theranos for questions about startup ethics; use VW for regulatory compliance failures.
This category addresses the unique ethical challenges of the information age, where personal data becomes a commodity and consent mechanisms often fail to protect users.
Compare: Cambridge Analytica vs. Wells Fargo—both exploited trust relationships (platform users vs. bank customers), but Cambridge Analytica violated informational privacy while Wells Fargo violated financial autonomy. Both illustrate how companies can weaponize access against the people who granted it.
These cases examine corporate responsibility for harms that occur outside direct company operations—in factories, communities, or environments where companies operate but don't directly control day-to-day activities.
Compare: Nike vs. Nestlé—both faced criticism for practices in developing countries, but Nike's harm was to workers in their supply chain while Nestlé's harm was to consumers of their product. Both illustrate how power imbalances between multinational corporations and vulnerable populations create ethical obligations.
| Ethical Concept | Best Case Examples |
|---|---|
| Fraudulent accounting / financial deception | Enron, WorldCom, Tyco |
| Fiduciary duty to shareholders | Enron, Tyco, WorldCom |
| Consumer deception / informed consent | Volkswagen, Theranos, Wells Fargo |
| Toxic corporate culture / perverse incentives | Wells Fargo, Enron |
| Data privacy and consent | Cambridge Analytica |
| Supply chain responsibility | Nike, BP |
| Marketing ethics / vulnerable populations | Nestlé |
| Environmental ethics / risk management | BP Deepwater Horizon |
| Regulatory reform catalyst | Enron, WorldCom (Sarbanes-Oxley) |
Which two cases both involved deliberate deception of regulators, and how did their methods differ?
If an FRQ asks you to analyze how corporate culture can institutionalize unethical behavior, which case provides the strongest evidence of systemic pressure on employees—and what specific mechanisms created that pressure?
Compare Enron and Tyco: both involved executive misconduct, but what distinguishes fraud against external stakeholders from theft from the company itself?
Which cases best illustrate the tension between shareholder profit maximization and stakeholder welfare? Identify at least three and explain which stakeholder groups were harmed in each.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act emerged from early 2000s scandals. Which specific cases prompted it, what problems did it address, and what types of misconduct (like Cambridge Analytica or Volkswagen) would it not have prevented?