Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Biotechnology techniques form the backbone of modern biological research, and you're being tested on more than just what each method does—you need to understand when and why scientists choose specific techniques. These tools fall into logical categories: some amplify or copy genetic material, others analyze it, and still others modify it. Recognizing these categories helps you predict which technique solves which problem, a skill that shows up repeatedly on exams.
The real exam challenge isn't memorizing protocols—it's understanding how techniques work together in experimental workflows. PCR amplifies DNA so gel electrophoresis can analyze it. Recombinant DNA technology creates constructs that gene cloning then replicates. Don't just memorize facts; know what category each technique belongs to and what problem it solves.
These methods create multiple copies of genetic material or genes, giving scientists enough material to work with. The underlying principle is replication—whether through enzymatic copying or biological reproduction in host cells.
Compare: PCR vs. Gene Cloning—both amplify DNA, but PCR uses enzymes in vitro (in a tube) while cloning uses living cells in vivo. If an FRQ asks about producing a functional protein, cloning is your answer; if it asks about quickly detecting a sequence, think PCR.
These methods help scientists visualize, measure, or identify biological molecules. The core principle is separation or detection based on physical or chemical properties.
Compare: Gel Electrophoresis vs. Western Blotting—both separate molecules by size, but gel electrophoresis analyzes nucleic acids or total protein, while Western blotting specifically identifies one protein using antibodies. Know which to use when the question asks for "detection" vs. "separation."
These methods alter DNA sequences or create new genetic combinations. The underlying principle is targeted manipulation—cutting, pasting, or rewriting genetic information.
Compare: Recombinant DNA Technology vs. CRISPR-Cas9—recombinant DNA adds foreign genes to an organism, while CRISPR can edit, delete, or modify existing genes. FRQs often ask which approach is better for correcting a mutation (CRISPR) vs. adding a new function (recombinant DNA).
These methods grow cells or produce proteins outside their natural environment. The core principle is controlled biological production—creating the conditions for cells or proteins to thrive and function.
Compare: Cell Culture vs. Protein Expression—cell culture maintains living cells for study, while protein expression uses cells as factories to produce a specific protein product. If the goal is studying cell behavior, use culture; if the goal is harvesting a protein, use expression systems.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| DNA Amplification | PCR, Gene Cloning |
| Size-Based Separation | Gel Electrophoresis, Western Blotting |
| Sequence Determination | DNA Sequencing (Sanger, NGS) |
| Genetic Modification | Recombinant DNA Technology, CRISPR-Cas9 |
| Protein Detection | Western Blotting, Flow Cytometry |
| Cell Analysis | Flow Cytometry, Cell Culture |
| Protein Production | Protein Expression and Purification, Gene Cloning |
| Molecular Cutting/Joining | Restriction Enzymes, Ligases (in Recombinant DNA) |
Which two techniques both amplify DNA but use fundamentally different approaches (in vitro vs. in vivo)? What determines which you would choose?
A researcher wants to confirm that a specific protein is being produced after gene cloning. Which analysis technique should they use, and why wouldn't gel electrophoresis alone be sufficient?
Compare and contrast recombinant DNA technology and CRISPR-Cas9. In what scenario would each be the preferred approach?
Arrange these techniques in the order they might appear in a typical workflow: gel electrophoresis, PCR, DNA sequencing. What role does each play?
An FRQ describes a scientist who needs to identify which cells in a mixed population express a specific surface marker. Which technique is most appropriate, and what property of that technique makes it ideal for this task?