Key Assessment Techniques

Why This Matters

Assessment isn't just about giving tests and assigning grades—it's the backbone of effective teaching and learning. You're being tested on understanding when and why educators use different assessment methods, how they inform instruction, and what each approach reveals about student learning. The big concepts here include formative vs. summative purposes, validity and reliability, authentic application of knowledge, and metacognition through self-evaluation.

Think of assessment techniques as tools in a toolkit: each serves a specific purpose, and skilled educators know which to reach for at different points in the learning process. Don't just memorize definitions—know what problem each assessment type solves and when it's most appropriately used. Understanding the underlying logic will help you tackle any FRQ scenario thrown your way.

---

Assessments by Timing: When Learning is Measured

The timing of an assessment determines its purpose. Assessments conducted at different points in instruction yield different types of information and serve distinct educational goals.

Diagnostic Assessment

• Administered before instruction begins—identifies what students already know and where gaps exist
• Reveals prerequisite skills and misconceptions that could interfere with new learning
• Informs differentiated instruction by helping teachers plan targeted interventions from day one

Formative Assessment

• Occurs during the learning process—provides real-time feedback while there's still time to adjust
• Low-stakes by design, encouraging risk-taking and honest demonstration of understanding
• Benefits both teachers and students by identifying areas needing reinforcement before final evaluation

Summative Assessment

• Administered at the end of an instructional unit—evaluates whether learning objectives were achieved
• High-stakes format typically including final exams, cumulative projects, or standardized tests
• Measures outcomes rather than progress, providing data for grades, placement, and accountability

---

Assessments by Method: How Learning is Demonstrated

Different assessment methods capture different types of knowledge and skills. The format you choose determines what abilities students can actually demonstrate.

Standardized Testing

• Administered and scored identically for all test-takers—ensures consistency across populations
• Norm-referenced or criterion-referenced comparisons against benchmarks or learning standards
• Influences policy and funding but criticized for narrowing curriculum to tested content

Performance-Based Assessment

• Requires demonstration through real-world tasks—students show what they can do, not just recall
• Assesses higher-order thinking including analysis, synthesis, and problem-solving
• Time-intensive to score but captures skills that multiple-choice formats miss

Authentic Assessment

• Mirrors tasks students will encounter outside school—emphasizes relevance and transfer
• Promotes deeper understanding by requiring application in meaningful contexts
• Increases student motivation through connection to real-world problems and audiences

---

Assessments by Evaluator: Who Judges the Work

The source of evaluation affects both the learning process and the type of feedback students receive. Shifting evaluation responsibility can develop metacognitive skills and collaborative learning.

Peer and Self-Assessment

• Transfers evaluation responsibility to students—builds critical thinking about quality and criteria
• Develops metacognition as students reflect on their own learning processes and outcomes
• Requires explicit training in using criteria; effectiveness depends on clear expectations

Observation and Anecdotal Records

• Teacher-conducted, real-time documentation—captures behaviors and processes tests can't measure
• Provides qualitative data on engagement, collaboration, and learning strategies
• Informs individualized support by revealing patterns in student behavior over time

---

Assessment Tools: Structures That Support Evaluation

These tools enhance the quality and consistency of other assessment methods. They don't stand alone but make other assessments more valid and reliable.

Rubrics

• Establish explicit criteria and performance levels—students know expectations before beginning
• Increase scoring reliability by reducing subjective variation between raters
• Function as instructional tools when shared in advance, guiding student effort toward valued outcomes

Portfolio Assessment

• Collects student work over time—shows growth, not just a single performance snapshot
• Encourages student reflection on learning journey and goal-setting for improvement
• Demonstrates range of abilities that single assessments cannot capture

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. A teacher wants to adjust tomorrow's lesson based on student understanding today. Which assessment type should they use, and why is it more appropriate than a summative approach?

2. Compare and contrast authentic assessment and standardized testing in terms of what each reveals about student learning and their respective limitations.

3. Which two assessment techniques most directly develop students' metacognitive skills? What do they have in common?

4. An FRQ describes a teacher who wants to ensure fair, consistent grading across multiple class sections. Which assessment tool addresses this concern, and how does it improve reliability?

5. A student's single test score seems inconsistent with their classroom performance. Which assessment method would provide the most comprehensive view of their abilities over time, and what additional information would it capture?