Key Airfoil Shapes

Why This Matters

Airfoil geometry is the foundation of everything you'll study in aerodynamics—it's where lift generation, drag reduction, boundary layer behavior, and compressibility effects all come together in a single physical shape. When you're analyzing aircraft performance or answering questions about design trade-offs, you need to understand why engineers choose specific airfoil profiles for specific flight regimes. The shape of an airfoil isn't arbitrary; it's a deliberate response to the physics of airflow at different speeds and conditions.

You're being tested on your ability to connect airfoil characteristics to aerodynamic principles: How does camber affect the pressure distribution? Why do high-speed aircraft need thinner profiles? What happens to drag when shock waves form? Don't just memorize that supercritical airfoils are used on commercial jets—know why their flattened upper surface delays shock formation and reduces wave drag. Each airfoil shape in this guide illustrates a specific solution to an aerodynamic challenge.

---

NACA Series: Systematic Design Approaches

The NACA (National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics) developed standardized airfoil families that allow engineers to predict performance characteristics from the designation numbers alone. Each series represents an evolution in design philosophy, optimizing for different flight conditions and Reynolds number ranges.

NACA 4-Digit Series

• Digit-coded geometry—the first digit gives maximum camber (% chord), second digit gives camber position (tenths of chord), last two digits give maximum thickness (% chord)
• Optimized for low-speed, general aviation applications where simplicity and predictable stall characteristics matter more than peak efficiency
• Well-documented performance data makes these airfoils ideal for initial design work and educational analysis

NACA 5-Digit Series

• Design lift coefficient focus—the first digit multiplied by 0.15 gives the design $C_L$, allowing engineers to target specific lift requirements
• Improved high-Reynolds-number performance compared to 4-digit series due to refined camber line positioning
• Forward camber placement provides better pressure distributions for more demanding aerodynamic applications

NACA 6-Series

• Laminar flow optimization—designed with pressure distributions that maintain laminar boundary layers over larger chord percentages
• Variable camber and thickness distributions create favorable pressure gradients that delay transition to turbulent flow
• Transonic and high-subsonic applications benefit from the reduced skin friction drag these profiles achieve

---

Camber and Symmetry: Lift Generation Fundamentals

The presence or absence of camber—the curvature of the mean chord line—fundamentally determines how an airfoil generates lift and behaves across different angles of attack.

Symmetric Airfoils

• Zero camber produces zero lift at zero angle of attack—lift comes entirely from angle of attack adjustments, making these ideal for aerobatic maneuvers requiring inverted flight
• Identical upper and lower surfaces simplify manufacturing and provide predictable, linear lift curves through positive and negative angles
• Helicopter rotor blades and control surfaces commonly use symmetric profiles where bidirectional performance matters

Cambered Airfoils

• Positive lift at zero angle of attack—the curved upper surface creates lower pressure than the flatter lower surface even when flying level
• Higher maximum lift coefficients compared to symmetric airfoils, making them more efficient for sustained cruise in one direction
• Camber magnitude directly affects the lift curve—more camber shifts the zero-lift angle more negative and increases $C_{L,max}$

Reflexed Airfoils

• Trailing edge curves downward (negative camber at rear)—this creates a nose-down pitching moment that improves longitudinal stability
• Self-stabilizing characteristics make these popular for flying wings and tailless aircraft where conventional tail surfaces aren't available
• Gliders and UAVs benefit from the reduced trim drag these airfoils provide in cruise configurations

---

Thickness Effects: Structural and Aerodynamic Trade-offs

Airfoil thickness—expressed as the maximum thickness-to-chord ratio—represents one of the most fundamental design trade-offs between structural requirements, low-speed lift capability, and high-speed drag.

Thick Airfoils

• Higher thickness ratios (12-18% chord) provide structural depth for wing spars, fuel tanks, and landing gear storage without external fairings
• Enhanced low-speed lift generation due to gentler pressure gradients that delay flow separation at high angles of attack
• STOL aircraft applications leverage thick profiles to maximize lift during takeoff and landing phases

Thin Airfoils

• Lower thickness ratios (6-10% chord) minimize pressure drag by reducing the adverse pressure gradient on the aft portion of the airfoil
• Critical for high-speed flight where compressibility effects amplify the drag penalty of thickness
• More susceptible to leading-edge stall—flow separation occurs abruptly at high angles of attack due to sharp pressure peaks

---

Speed Regime Optimization: Subsonic to Transonic Design

Different flight speed regimes impose fundamentally different aerodynamic constraints, requiring airfoils specifically engineered for incompressible low-speed flow, compressible high-subsonic flow, or shock-dominated transonic conditions.

Low-Speed Airfoils

• Higher camber and thickness maximize lift coefficients when dynamic pressure is low and compressibility effects are negligible
• Optimized for Reynolds numbers typical of general aviation—boundary layer behavior at these conditions drives the design
• Gentle stall characteristics prioritize safety and controllability during takeoff, landing, and slow-flight maneuvers

High-Speed Airfoils

• Thinner profiles with reduced camber minimize the pressure peaks that cause early shock formation as local flow approaches sonic speeds
• Delayed critical Mach number—the design goal is pushing the onset of compressibility drag to higher flight speeds
• Military jets and advanced transports use these profiles to maximize cruise efficiency in the high-subsonic regime

Supercritical Airfoils

• Flattened upper surface reduces peak suction pressure—this delays shock wave formation to higher freestream Mach numbers
• Pronounced aft camber compensates for lift loss from the flattened upper surface, maintaining overall lift capability
• Wave drag reduction is the primary benefit—modern commercial aircraft achieve significantly better fuel efficiency using supercritical profiles

---

Boundary Layer Management: Drag Reduction Strategies

Controlling the boundary layer—the thin region of flow directly adjacent to the airfoil surface—is essential for minimizing skin friction drag and preventing flow separation.

Laminar Flow Airfoils

• Pressure distribution designed to maintain favorable gradients—accelerating flow over the forward portion delays transition from laminar to turbulent boundary layers
• Significant skin friction reduction since laminar boundary layers produce roughly 90% less friction drag than turbulent ones
• Surface quality critical—even small imperfections (bugs, rain, rivets) can trigger premature transition and negate the benefits

Natural Laminar Flow Airfoils

• Shape-optimized to achieve laminar flow without active systems—no suction, blowing, or special coatings required
• Careful contouring maintains accelerating flow over 50-70% of the chord before the inevitable transition to turbulence
• Gliders and high-efficiency aircraft use these profiles where the performance benefit justifies the manufacturing precision required

---

High-Lift and Specialized Configurations

Some applications require airfoil designs that prioritize specific performance characteristics—maximum lift coefficient, stability, or adaptable geometry—over general efficiency.

Multi-Element Airfoils

• Slats, flaps, and main element work together to achieve lift coefficients impossible with single-element designs ($C_L$ values exceeding 3.0)
• Slot effect energizes boundary layer—high-velocity flow through gaps delays separation on downstream elements
• Takeoff and landing configurations on commercial aircraft rely on multi-element systems to reduce required runway length

Blunt Trailing Edge Airfoils

• Finite trailing edge thickness improves structural integrity and reduces sensitivity to manufacturing tolerances
• Enhanced low-speed stall characteristics—the blunt edge creates a small separation region that stabilizes the wake
• Trade-off is increased base drag—acceptable in applications where low-speed handling matters more than cruise efficiency

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two airfoil types both prioritize drag reduction at high speeds but use fundamentally different design strategies to achieve it? Explain the mechanism each employs.

2. A designer needs an airfoil for an aerobatic aircraft that must perform equally well in inverted flight. Which airfoil category is most appropriate, and what characteristic makes it suitable?

3. Compare and contrast thick and thin airfoils: Under what flight conditions does each excel, and what structural trade-offs does the designer accept with each choice?

4. If an FRQ asks you to explain why modern commercial aircraft can cruise efficiently at Mach 0.85 while earlier jets were limited to Mach 0.75, which airfoil development would you cite and what specific aerodynamic principle does it exploit?

5. Both laminar flow airfoils and supercritical airfoils aim to reduce drag. Identify which type of drag each targets and explain why a single airfoil design cannot optimize for both simultaneously.