Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Abstract Expressionism represents a seismic shift in art history—the moment when New York replaced Paris as the center of the art world and American artists redefined what painting could be. You're being tested on more than names and dates here; exam questions focus on how these artists revolutionized technique, why their work conveyed emotional and spiritual content, and what distinguishes the movement's two major camps: Action Painting (gesture, process, physicality) versus Color Field Painting (contemplation, color as emotion, sublime experience).
Understanding these artists means grasping the philosophical stakes of postwar abstraction. These painters weren't just making pretty pictures—they were responding to existentialism, Jungian psychology, and the trauma of World War II. When you encounter an FRQ asking you to compare artistic approaches or analyze how technique conveys meaning, these distinctions become your toolkit. Don't just memorize who painted what—know what concept each artist's work best illustrates.
Action Painting treats the canvas as an arena for physical engagement. The act of painting becomes the subject itself, with spontaneous gesture, bodily movement, and visible brushwork conveying raw emotional energy.
Compare: Pollock vs. Kline—both emphasize gesture and physical mark-making, but Pollock's drip technique removes the brush entirely while Kline's work depends on the loaded brushstroke. If asked about Action Painting's range, these two demonstrate its spectrum from poured paint to bold brushwork.
Color Field painting prioritizes large areas of flat color as the primary means of expression. These artists sought transcendence and spiritual experience through simplified forms and carefully calibrated chromatic relationships.
Compare: Rothko vs. Newman—both pursue the sublime through color, but Rothko's soft edges and layered glazes create atmospheric depth, while Newman's hard-edged zips and flat surfaces emphasize the picture plane. Both reject gesture in favor of contemplation.
These artists developed new techniques that bridged Abstract Expressionism with subsequent movements, demonstrating how material experimentation could generate new aesthetic possibilities.
Compare: Frankenthaler vs. Krasner—both expanded painting's technical vocabulary, but Frankenthaler's innovation was additive (new staining method) while Krasner's was transformative (recycling and reconstructing existing work). Both challenged assumptions about what painting materials could do.
Some Abstract Expressionists emphasized conceptual frameworks alongside visual innovation, drawing on literature, philosophy, and political engagement to deepen their work's meaning.
Compare: Motherwell vs. Gorky—both integrate intellectual and emotional content, but Motherwell's references are explicitly political and literary, while Gorky's are autobiographical and psychologically layered. Both demonstrate that abstraction can carry specific meaning.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Action Painting / Gesture | Pollock, de Kooning, Kline |
| Color Field / Sublime | Rothko, Newman, Still |
| Technical Innovation | Frankenthaler (soak-stain), Krasner (collage) |
| Figuration in Abstraction | de Kooning, Gorky |
| Political/Literary Content | Motherwell, Gorky |
| Spiritual/Transcendental Aims | Rothko, Newman |
| Process as Subject | Pollock, Krasner |
| Bridge to Later Movements | Frankenthaler, Newman |
Which two artists best represent the contrast between Action Painting and Color Field approaches, and what specific techniques distinguish them?
If an FRQ asks you to discuss how Abstract Expressionists conveyed spiritual or transcendental content, which artists and works would you cite, and why?
Compare Pollock's drip technique with Frankenthaler's soak-stain method—what do they share, and how do their effects differ?
Which artist serves as the crucial link between European Surrealism and American Abstract Expressionism, and what formal elements demonstrate this connection?
How do de Kooning and Rothko represent opposing approaches to the human presence in painting? Consider both technique and philosophical intent in your answer.