Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Invasive species represent one of the most powerful case studies for understanding ecological disruption and human-environment interactions—two themes that appear repeatedly on environmental science exams. When you study these organisms, you're really learning about competitive exclusion, trophic cascades, niche exploitation, and unintended consequences of human activity. Each species on this list demonstrates a specific mechanism by which non-native organisms destabilize ecosystems, from outcompeting natives for resources to fundamentally altering habitat structure.
Don't just memorize which species lives where—know why each one succeeds as an invader and what ecological principle it illustrates. Exam questions often ask you to compare introduction pathways, predict ecosystem impacts, or evaluate management strategies. If you understand the underlying mechanisms, you can apply that knowledge to any invasive species scenario, even ones you've never seen before. You've got this.
These species succeed by physically dominating space and resources, using rapid growth rates to outcompete native vegetation. The key mechanism is competitive exclusion through resource monopolization—they grow faster, spread wider, and block access to sunlight, water, or nutrients.
Compare: Kudzu vs. Water Hyacinth—both kill native plants through light exclusion, but kudzu operates in terrestrial systems while water hyacinth disrupts aquatic ecosystems. If an FRQ asks about mechanisms of competitive exclusion, either makes an excellent example of physical resource monopolization.
These invaders alter freshwater and marine food webs by consuming resources at unsustainable rates or outcompeting native species. The mechanism here is trophic disruption—they insert themselves into food chains and redirect energy flow away from native species.
Compare: Asian Carp vs. Zebra Mussels—both disrupt food webs through filter-feeding that depletes plankton, but carp are mobile vertebrates affecting river systems while mussels are sessile invertebrates that also cause infrastructure damage. This contrast illustrates how different taxa can exploit similar ecological niches.
These species succeed because they occupy top predator or novel consumer roles with no natural enemies in their new environments. The mechanism is predator release—without population control from above, their numbers explode and cascade down the food web.
Compare: Burmese Python vs. Cane Toad—both lack natural predators, but through opposite mechanisms. Pythons have no predators because of their size; cane toads have no predators because they're toxic. Both demonstrate how predator release drives population explosions.
These invaders succeed through direct competition with native species for specific resources like nesting sites, food, or habitat space. The mechanism is interference competition—they actively exclude natives rather than simply consuming shared resources.
Compare: European Starling vs. Lionfish—both outcompete natives for resources, but starlings compete for nesting sites (a spatial resource) while lionfish compete for prey (a food resource). This distinction matters when analyzing competition mechanisms on exams.
Some invasive threats aren't animals or plants but pathogens that devastate native species populations. The mechanism is novel pathogen introduction—native species have no evolved resistance to diseases from other regions.
Compare: Dutch Elm Disease vs. Cane Toad—both represent biocontrol or introduction failures, but through different mechanisms. The fungus spreads passively via insect vectors, while cane toads actively disperse. Both show how invasive organisms can fundamentally restructure ecosystems.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Competitive exclusion (light/space) | Kudzu, Water Hyacinth, Japanese Knotweed |
| Trophic disruption (food web alteration) | Asian Carp, Zebra Mussels, Lionfish |
| Predator release (no natural enemies) | Burmese Python, Cane Toad, Lionfish |
| Interference competition | European Starling, Lionfish |
| Infrastructure damage | Zebra Mussels, Japanese Knotweed |
| Biocontrol failures | Cane Toad, Kudzu |
| Aquarium/pet trade introductions | Burmese Python, Lionfish |
| Ballast water/shipping pathways | Zebra Mussels, Dutch Elm Disease |
Which two invasive species share the mechanism of depleting plankton through filter-feeding, and how do their ecosystem impacts differ?
Compare the introduction pathways of kudzu and cane toads. What common theme connects these two cases, and what lesson does this suggest about intentional species introductions?
If an FRQ asked you to explain how an invasive species can cause a trophic cascade, which example from this list would you choose and why?
Both Burmese pythons and cane toads lack natural predators in their invaded ranges, but for different reasons. Explain the mechanism behind each species' predator release.
Identify three invasive species that were introduced through the ornamental plant or pet trade. What policy recommendation might address this common pathway?