Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Interview preparation separates amateur broadcasts from professional journalism. In radio newsroom work, you're being tested on your ability to extract compelling audio content while maintaining ethical standards and technical quality. The strategies you'll learn here demonstrate core principles: research methodology, question design, active listening, and production logistics—all skills that translate directly to real-world broadcasting careers.
Don't approach this as a checklist to memorize. Instead, understand why each preparation phase matters and how these elements work together to create interviews that inform, engage, and respect both your subject and your audience. When you're evaluated, you'll need to demonstrate not just what to do, but the reasoning behind each strategic choice.
Before you record a single second of audio, your preparation determines whether you'll ask surface-level questions or uncover genuine insights. Thorough research transforms you from a question-reader into a conversational partner.
Compare: Background Research vs. Topic Immersion—both involve pre-interview homework, but background research focuses on the person while topic immersion focuses on the subject matter. Strong preparation requires both; weak interviewers often neglect one or the other.
The questions you craft determine the quality of audio you'll capture. Strategic question design balances preparation with flexibility, ensuring you cover essential ground while remaining responsive to unexpected revelations.
Compare: Open-Ended Questions vs. Follow-Up Questions—open-ended questions launch topics, while follow-ups deepen them. Master interviewers use their prepared questions to open doors, then follow-ups to explore what's inside. If an assignment asks you to demonstrate interview technique, show both skills.
Every strong interview has architecture. Planning your structure ensures you capture a complete narrative arc while remaining flexible enough to pursue unexpected gold.
Compare: Opening vs. Conclusion—both bookend your interview, but they serve opposite functions. Openings establish credibility and create anticipation; conclusions synthesize meaning and provide closure. Weak interviewers neglect conclusions, letting conversations trail off without resolution.
Professional-quality interviews require professional-quality preparation. Technical failures destroy otherwise excellent content, making logistics as important as editorial planning.
Compare: Equipment Prep vs. Location Selection—both prevent technical disasters, but equipment issues are usually recoverable (you can re-record) while location problems often can't be fixed in post-production. When time is limited, prioritize finding a quiet space over perfecting your gear setup.
Ethical preparation protects you, your subject, and your audience. Understanding consent, confidentiality, and legal requirements isn't optional—it's foundational to legitimate journalism.
Compare: Consent Requirements vs. Active Listening—both demonstrate respect for your interview subject, but consent is a legal obligation while active listening is a professional skill. You can be legally compliant while still being a poor listener, but ethical journalism requires both.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Pre-Interview Research | Background research, topic immersion, source cross-referencing |
| Question Design | Open-ended questions, question hierarchy, follow-up preparation |
| Interview Architecture | Three-act structure, guest introduction, planned transitions |
| Technical Preparation | Equipment testing, backup systems, gain level checks |
| Location Logistics | Acoustic scouting, comfort considerations, distraction elimination |
| Ethical Standards | Consent protocols, confidentiality agreements, boundary respect |
| Real-Time Skills | Active listening, minimal encouragers, nonverbal awareness |
What distinguishes background research on your subject from topic immersion, and why does thorough preparation require both approaches?
Compare open-ended questions with follow-up questions: how do they work together to produce compelling interview content?
If you had only 15 minutes to prepare for an unexpected interview, which three preparation strategies would you prioritize and why?
Explain how the three-act interview structure (opening, body, conclusion) serves both the listener's experience and the journalist's editorial goals.
A guest becomes uncomfortable with a line of questioning and asks to go off the record. What ethical considerations should guide your response, and how does your pre-interview preparation affect this moment?