International Human Rights Treaties

Why This Matters

When you're studying comparative criminal justice systems, international human rights treaties are the connective tissue that links domestic legal systems to global standards. These treaties don't just exist as abstract ideals—they actively shape how countries structure their courts, treat defendants, handle prisoners, and protect vulnerable populations. You're being tested on how these instruments create binding obligations versus aspirational standards, how enforcement mechanisms vary dramatically between systems, and why some treaties carry more weight in certain regions than others.

Understanding these treaties means grasping the tension between state sovereignty and universal rights, between civil-political rights and economic-social rights, and between regional and global enforcement systems. Don't just memorize adoption dates and article counts—know what legal mechanisms each treaty creates, which populations it protects, and how its monitoring body actually holds states accountable. That's what FRQs will ask you to analyze.

---

Foundational Global Instruments

These treaties establish the baseline standards that all other human rights instruments build upon. They represent the post-WWII consensus that certain rights belong to all humans regardless of citizenship or national boundaries.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR)

• Adopted in 1948 by the UN General Assembly—this is the foundational document that defines what "human rights" means in international law
• Not legally binding but carries enormous moral authority; it's a declaration, not a treaty, which means states can't technically violate it
• 30 articles covering civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights—inspired virtually every subsequent human rights treaty and many national constitutions

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR)

• Adopted in 1966, legally binding on signatories—unlike the UDHR, this creates actual legal obligations states can be held to
• Covers criminal justice essentials: right to life, freedom from torture, right to fair trial, presumption of innocence, freedom of expression
• Human Rights Committee monitors compliance—reviews state reports and hears individual complaints under the Optional Protocol

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR)

• Adopted in 1966 alongside the ICCPR—together with the UDHR, these three form the "International Bill of Rights"
• Progressive realization standard means states must work toward full implementation rather than guarantee rights immediately
• Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights monitors compliance—less directly relevant to criminal justice but establishes baseline conditions

---

Criminal Justice-Specific Protections

These treaties directly address how states must treat individuals within the criminal justice system—from arrest through incarceration. They're your go-to examples for questions about defendant rights and prison conditions.

Convention against Torture (CAT)

• Adopted in 1984, creates absolute prohibition—torture cannot be justified under any circumstances, including war, terrorism, or national emergency
• Requires states to criminalize torture domestically and either prosecute or extradite alleged torturers (aut dedere aut judicare)
• Committee against Torture conducts country visits and reviews reports—one of the stronger enforcement mechanisms in the UN system

European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

• Adopted in 1950, strongest enforcement mechanism globally—the European Court of Human Rights issues binding judgments against member states
• Article 6 fair trial rights are heavily litigated and have shaped criminal procedure across Europe
• Individual petition system allows anyone to bring claims directly to the Court after exhausting domestic remedies—this is what makes it uniquely powerful

---

Protected Population Treaties

These instruments focus on groups historically vulnerable to discrimination and abuse within criminal justice systems. They're essential for questions about disparate treatment and systemic bias.

Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW)

• Adopted in 1979, addresses systemic gender discrimination—relevant to criminal justice through issues like domestic violence prosecution, trafficking, and treatment of women prisoners
• Requires states to modify social and cultural patterns that perpetuate discrimination—goes beyond formal legal equality
• Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women reviews state reports and can hear individual complaints under the Optional Protocol

Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC)

• Adopted in 1989, most widely ratified human rights treaty—only the United States has not ratified it among UN members
• "Best interests of the child" standard must guide all decisions—directly shapes juvenile justice systems worldwide
• Prohibits life imprisonment without parole for minors and capital punishment for crimes committed under 18

International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD)

• Adopted in 1965, actually predates the Covenants—reflects urgency around decolonization and civil rights movements
• Requires states to prohibit racial discrimination by public authorities—directly relevant to racial profiling, disparate sentencing, and prison demographics
• Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination was the first UN treaty body established—pioneered the state reporting system

---

Regional Human Rights Systems

Regional treaties often provide stronger enforcement than global instruments because they operate among states with shared legal traditions and political accountability. These systems demonstrate how geography shapes rights protection.

European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)

• European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg issues legally binding judgments—states must comply or face political consequences within the Council of Europe
• Covers 46 member states including non-EU countries like Turkey, Russia (suspended 2022), and Ukraine
• Jurisprudence on fair trial, detention conditions, and police conduct has harmonized criminal procedure standards across Europe

American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR)

• Adopted in 1969, creates two-tier system—Inter-American Commission investigates complaints, Inter-American Court issues binding judgments
• United States signed but never ratified—limits the system's reach in the hemisphere
• Strong jurisprudence on forced disappearances and extrajudicial killings—developed during Latin American dictatorships and remains relevant

African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (ACHPR)

• Adopted in 1981 (entered force 1986), uniquely emphasizes collective rights—includes rights of "peoples" alongside individual rights
• Recognizes duties alongside rights—individuals have obligations to family, society, and state, reflecting African communitarian philosophy
• African Commission and African Court provide oversight, though enforcement remains weaker than European system

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two treaties together with the UDHR form the "International Bill of Rights," and what's the key enforcement difference between them?

2. Compare the enforcement mechanisms of the ECHR and CAT—why can the European system hold states more accountable than the global system?

3. If an FRQ asks about international standards for juvenile justice, which treaty is your primary source, and what specific protections does it require?

4. What distinguishes the ACHPR from other regional human rights instruments in terms of its philosophical approach to rights?

5. A country is accused of systematically using torture during police interrogations. Which treaties are most directly relevant, and what obligations do they impose on the state?