Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Integrated rate laws let you predict exactly how much reactant remains at any point during a reaction. They connect reaction order to a characteristic equation, graph shape, half-life behavior, and rate constant units. These concepts appear frequently on the AP exam, both in multiple-choice questions asking you to identify reaction order from data and in FRQs where you calculate concentrations, determine half-lives, or analyze graphs.
Each reaction order produces a unique mathematical fingerprint. Zero-order reactions proceed at a constant rate regardless of concentration. First-order reactions slow down proportionally as reactant depletes. Second-order reactions slow down even more dramatically. Don't just memorize the equations: understand why each order behaves differently and how to identify them from graphs, half-life patterns, and unit analysis.
Each reaction order has a distinct integrated rate law relating concentration to time. The mathematical form determines everything else: graph shape, half-life behavior, and rate constant units.
Concentration decreases linearly with time, making this the simplest form. The rate is constant and independent of concentration; the reaction proceeds at a steady pace until the reactant is completely gone.
Zero-order kinetics commonly show up in surface-catalyzed reactions where the catalyst surface is saturated. Once every active site is occupied, adding more reactant molecules doesn't speed anything up.
This natural log form is what you'll use for graphing and most calculations. There's also an equivalent exponential decay form:
The concentration decreases by the same fraction in each equal time interval. This is the most frequently tested order because it applies to radioactive decay, many decomposition reactions, and biological processes.
The reciprocal form creates a positive slope when graphed against time. The rate depends on concentration squared (or on the product of two reactant concentrations in bimolecular steps), so the reaction slows dramatically as concentration drops because far fewer productive collisions occur.
Compare: First-order and second-order both slow down as reactant depletes, but first-order decreases by a constant fraction each interval while second-order slows more steeply due to the squared dependence. If an FRQ gives you concentration-time data, plot both and vs. time to see which gives a straight line.
Half-life equations reveal how reaction order affects the time needed to consume half the reactant. The relationship between half-life and initial concentration is one of the most useful diagnostic tools you have.
Half-life is directly proportional to initial concentration. As the reaction progresses and less reactant remains, each successive half-life gets shorter. Students often mix this up on exams, so pay attention: for zero-order, successive half-lives decrease.
This is the famous constant half-life equation. There's no concentration term at all, so whether you start with 1 M or 0.001 M, the half-life is identical. If you see successive half-lives that are equal in experimental data, the reaction is first-order.
Half-life is inversely proportional to initial concentration. Each successive half-life is longer than the last because the concentration keeps dropping. A useful calculation shortcut: doubling the initial concentration cuts the half-life in half.
Compare: Zero-order and second-order half-lives both depend on , but in opposite ways. Zero-order half-life decreases as concentration drops (direct proportion), while second-order half-life increases (inverse proportion). First-order is the only order with a constant half-life.
The graphical method is the most reliable way to determine reaction order from experimental data. Whichever plot yields a straight line reveals the order.
Plot vs. time. A linear graph with a negative slope confirms zero-order kinetics. The slope equals , so you can read the rate constant directly. The y-intercept gives .
Plot vs. time. Linearity confirms first-order behavior. The slope equals (the line slopes downward). This is the most commonly tested graphing scenario on AP exams.
Plot vs. time. A straight line with a positive slope indicates second-order. The slope equals (positive, unlike the other two orders). The y-intercept equals , so take the reciprocal to find the actual initial concentration.
Compare: Each order transforms the data differently to achieve linearity. The key exam skill is checking the y-axis label: , , or . If you're given a linear graph, look at the y-axis first to identify the order.
The rate law must always yield units of for the reaction rate, so the units of change depending on how many concentration terms appear. Working backward from units is a quick way to verify reaction order.
Units: (equivalently, )
Since rate with no concentration terms, itself must carry the full rate units of concentration per time.
Units:
Dimensional check: rate , so . Notice these are inverse-time units only, with no concentration component. This is consistent with the half-life equation , which only works dimensionally if has units of inverse time.
Units:
Dimensional check: rate , so . If a problem gives you with these units, you immediately know it's second-order without needing any other information.
Compare: If an exam problem provides the rate constant with units, you can determine the reaction order right away. This is often the fastest path to the answer on multiple-choice questions.
Real kinetics problems require you to identify reaction order from data. The AP exam tests several approaches.
Compare rates at different starting concentrations while holding everything else constant. If doubling doubles the rate, the reaction is first-order in A. If doubling quadruples the rate, it's second-order. If doubling has no effect on rate, it's zero-order.
On FRQs, you'll typically set up ratios of rate laws from two trials to solve for the order algebraically.
Plot all three graphs ( vs. time, vs. time, vs. time) and identify which one is linear. This is the most definitive method because it uses all data points across the entire reaction, not just initial values. If you're given a table of concentration vs. time data, this is usually the expected approach.
Observe how changes across different initial concentrations or successive intervals:
This is the quickest diagnostic when half-life data is provided directly in the problem.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Linear vs. time plot | Zero-order reactions |
| Linear vs. time plot | First-order reactions |
| Linear vs. time plot | Second-order reactions |
| Constant half-life | First-order only |
| Half-life depends on | Zero-order (direct), Second-order (inverse) |
| Rate constant in | First-order reactions |
| Rate constant in | Second-order reactions |
| Exponential decay behavior | First-order reactions |
If successive half-lives in an experiment are 20 s, 40 s, and 80 s, what is the reaction order, and how do you know?
A reaction has a rate constant of . What is the reaction order, and what integrated rate law equation would you use?
Compare and contrast how you would graphically determine whether a reaction is first-order versus second-order. What would you plot, and what would you look for?
For a zero-order reaction with and , calculate the half-life. How would this half-life change if you started with ?
An FRQ provides concentration-time data and asks you to determine reaction order. Describe the systematic approach you would use, including what calculations or graphs you would create.