Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Understanding the landscape of tech policy think tanks is essential because these organizations fundamentally shape the rules governing how technology intersects with your daily life—from privacy protections and free speech online to AI regulation and cybersecurity policy. When you're tested on technology policy, you're not just being asked to name organizations; you're being evaluated on your understanding of how different ideological frameworks, research methodologies, and advocacy strategies influence the policy outcomes that govern the digital world.
These think tanks represent distinct approaches to the central tension in tech policy: balancing innovation with protection. Some prioritize civil liberties and individual rights, others emphasize economic competitiveness and growth, and still others focus on long-term existential risks or national security implications. Don't just memorize which organization does what—know what perspective each brings to policy debates and how their approach shapes their recommendations.
These organizations approach tech policy primarily through the lens of protecting individual freedoms in the digital age. Their core assumption is that technology can threaten fundamental rights unless actively safeguarded through policy and legal action.
Compare: CDT vs. EFF—both defend digital civil liberties, but CDT emphasizes policy engagement and stakeholder collaboration while EFF focuses on litigation and public advocacy. If an exam question asks about organizations that directly shape legislation through insider engagement, CDT is your answer; for legal challenges and public campaigns, cite EFF.
These institutions prioritize empirical research and nonpartisan analysis over advocacy. Their influence comes from providing the factual foundation that other actors—policymakers, advocates, and journalists—use to make arguments.
Compare: Pew Research Center vs. Brookings Institution—both provide empirical research, but Pew focuses on measuring public attitudes while Brookings offers policy recommendations based on expert analysis. Use Pew when discussing what the public thinks; cite Brookings for what experts recommend.
These organizations view technology policy primarily through an economic lens. They argue that smart policy should promote innovation, competitiveness, and growth rather than restrict technological development.
Compare: ITIF vs. EFF—both engage in tech policy advocacy but from opposite starting points. ITIF prioritizes innovation and economic growth, sometimes accepting trade-offs on privacy or regulation; EFF prioritizes civil liberties, sometimes accepting slower innovation. This contrast illustrates the fundamental tension between innovation-first and rights-first approaches in tech policy.
These organizations bring explicit ideological frameworks to tech policy debates. Understanding their philosophical foundations helps predict their positions on emerging issues.
Compare: Cato Institute vs. New America Foundation—both advocate for "internet freedom" but mean different things by it. Cato emphasizes freedom from government regulation; New America emphasizes freedom from corporate power and ensuring equitable access. This distinction reveals how the same terminology can mask fundamentally different policy priorities.
These organizations examine technology policy through the lens of existential risk, national security, and geopolitical strategy. Their time horizons extend beyond immediate policy debates to consider transformative and potentially catastrophic scenarios.
Compare: FHI vs. CSIS—both address technology risks but at different scales. FHI focuses on long-term existential threats from transformative technologies; CSIS addresses near-term geopolitical and security challenges. FHI asks "Will AI end civilization?"; CSIS asks "How does AI change the U.S.-China relationship?"
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Civil liberties and digital rights | EFF, CDT, New America |
| Nonpartisan empirical research | Pew Research Center, Brookings, RAND |
| Pro-innovation economic focus | ITIF |
| Libertarian/limited government | Cato Institute |
| Progressive/equity-focused | New America Foundation |
| National security and geopolitics | CSIS, RAND |
| Existential risk and AI safety | Future of Humanity Institute |
| Legal advocacy and litigation | EFF |
Which two organizations both focus on digital civil liberties but use fundamentally different strategies (policy engagement vs. litigation)?
If a policy debate centers on whether the U.S. government should increase R&D funding to compete with China technologically, which think tank's research would most directly support that position, and why?
Compare and contrast the Cato Institute and New America Foundation's approaches to "internet freedom"—how do their ideological frameworks lead them to different policy conclusions?
An FRQ asks you to evaluate different perspectives on AI regulation. Which think tanks would you cite to represent (a) an innovation-first view, (b) a civil liberties view, and (c) an existential risk view?
Why might a policymaker consult Pew Research Center data before consulting Brookings Institution analysis—what distinct function does each serve in the policy research ecosystem?