Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Social movements are the engine of American political change, and understanding them means understanding how ordinary people have reshaped the nation's laws, institutions, and values. You're being tested not just on what these movements accomplished, but on the strategies they used, the opposition they faced, and how they built on each other's tactics. The 20th century saw an explosion of organized activism—from labor strikes to sit-ins to mass marches—and recognizing the patterns across these movements will help you tackle any DBQ or LEQ that asks about reform, democracy, or American identity.
Don't just memorize dates and legislation. Know why each movement emerged when it did, how activists pressured those in power, and what connections exist between movements fighting for different causes. Whether it's the influence of Black civil rights tactics on the Chicano Movement or how environmental activism borrowed from consumer advocacy, these threads tie together the story of 20th-century America. Master the concepts, and you'll be ready for anything the exam throws at you.
These movements challenged who could fully participate in American democracy, pushing to extend constitutional rights to groups systematically excluded from the political process. The common thread: using protest, litigation, and legislative lobbying to force the nation to live up to its founding ideals.
Compare: Women's Suffrage vs. Civil Rights Movement—both used constitutional amendments and federal legislation to expand democratic participation, but the Civil Rights Movement faced violent resistance requiring federal enforcement. If an FRQ asks about strategies for achieving reform, note how the Civil Rights Movement combined legal, economic, and moral tactics more comprehensively than earlier movements.
These movements addressed the power imbalance between workers and employers, consumers and corporations. The underlying principle: industrial capitalism created new forms of exploitation that required collective action and government regulation to address.
Compare: Labor Movement vs. Consumer Rights Movement—both challenged corporate power, but labor organized workers within the production process while consumer advocacy mobilized the public as buyers. The labor movement peaked in the 1930s-40s; consumer rights gained momentum in the 1960s-70s as the economy shifted toward consumption.
These movements fought not only for legal rights but for cultural recognition and community empowerment. They challenged dominant narratives about American identity and demanded that institutions reflect the nation's diversity.
Compare: Chicano Movement vs. Native American Rights Movement—both addressed the experiences of communities with pre-U.S. presence in North America, but Native movements emphasized sovereignty and treaty rights while Chicano activism focused on integration, labor rights, and cultural recognition within American society.
These movements mobilized public opinion to oppose specific government actions or industrial practices, using media attention and mass protest to shift national debate.
Compare: Anti-War Movement vs. Environmental Movement—both emerged in the late 1960s and used mass mobilization to challenge government and corporate decisions, but the environmental movement achieved lasting institutional changes (EPA, major legislation) while the anti-war movement's success was more limited to ending one specific conflict. Both showed how movements could shift from fringe to mainstream rapidly.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Expanding voting rights | Women's Suffrage, Civil Rights Movement |
| Economic justice | Labor Movement, Consumer Rights Movement, Chicano Movement (UFW) |
| Federal legislation as movement victory | Civil Rights Act (1964), ADA (1990), Voting Rights Act (1965) |
| Direct action tactics | Montgomery Bus Boycott, Stonewall, Alcatraz occupation, Section 504 sit-ins |
| Cultural recognition and identity | Chicano Movement, Native American Rights, LGBTQ+ Rights |
| Challenging government policy | Anti-War Movement, Environmental Movement |
| Media and public opinion | Consumer Rights (Unsafe at Any Speed), Environmental (Silent Spring), Anti-War (Pentagon Papers) |
| Constitutional amendments | 19th Amendment (suffrage), 14th Amendment (applied in Obergefell) |
Which two movements most directly borrowed tactics from the African American Civil Rights Movement, and what specific strategies did they adopt?
Compare and contrast the Labor Movement and the Consumer Rights Movement: how did each challenge corporate power, and why did they peak in different decades?
If an FRQ asked you to explain how social movements expanded the meaning of American democracy in the 20th century, which three movements would provide the strongest evidence and why?
The Chicano Movement and Native American Rights Movement both addressed communities with deep roots in North American land. What distinguished their goals and strategies from each other?
Which movements achieved their major legislative victories in the 1960s-70s, and what does this clustering suggest about that era's political environment?