Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Understanding the major figures in psycholinguistics isn't just about memorizing names and dates—it's about grasping the fundamental debates that shape how we understand the human mind. You're being tested on competing theories of language acquisition: Is language innate or learned? Does thought shape language, or does language shape thought? What role does social interaction play in cognitive development? These questions form the backbone of exam content on language cognition.
Each psycholinguist represents a distinct theoretical position, and the AP exam loves to test whether you can identify which theory explains a given phenomenon. Don't just memorize who said what—know why their ideas conflict, what evidence supports each view, and how these theories apply to real-world language development. When you can compare Chomsky's nativism to Skinner's behaviorism or contrast Piaget's individual constructivism with Vygotsky's social approach, you're thinking like the exam wants you to think.
These theorists argue that humans are born with specialized cognitive machinery for language. The core claim is that language acquisition is too rapid and too uniform across cultures to be explained by learning alone—something innate must guide the process.
Compare: Chomsky vs. Pinker—both argue language is innate, but Chomsky focuses on grammatical structure while Pinker emphasizes evolutionary origins. If an FRQ asks about biological bases of language, either works, but Pinker better addresses the "why" of language evolution.
These theorists emphasize environmental factors in language acquisition. The central mechanism is that children learn language the same way they learn other behaviors—through observation, imitation, and reinforcement from their environment.
Compare: Skinner vs. Chomsky—this is the foundational debate in psycholinguistics. Skinner says language is learned through reinforcement; Chomsky says this can't explain the "poverty of the stimulus" (children hear limited input but produce infinite novel sentences). Know both positions cold.
These theorists situate language within broader theories of how children's minds develop. Language isn't studied in isolation but as one component of cognitive growth, either emerging from general cognitive abilities or serving as a tool for thought.
Compare: Piaget vs. Bates—both see language as connected to general cognition, but Piaget focuses on developmental stages while Bates emphasizes neural and processing mechanisms. Bates directly challenged Chomsky; Piaget predates that debate.
These theorists emphasize that language develops through social interaction and is shaped by cultural context. The key insight is that you cannot separate language learning from the social relationships and cultural practices in which it occurs.
Compare: Vygotsky vs. Tomasello—both stress social interaction, but Vygotsky focuses on adult scaffolding and the ZPD while Tomasello emphasizes joint attention and intention-reading. For questions about how caregivers support language learning, Vygotsky is your go-to; for questions about what makes human language unique, use Tomasello.
These theorists investigate how language and cognition influence each other. The central question is whether language merely expresses pre-existing thoughts or actively shapes how we perceive and conceptualize the world.
Compare: Slobin vs. Clark—Slobin asks how language shapes thought processes, while Clark asks how children acquire word meanings. Both study the language-cognition interface but from different angles: Slobin is about influence, Clark is about acquisition.
These theorists focus on the cognitive mechanisms underlying how we produce and comprehend language in real time. The goal is to build detailed models of the mental stages involved in going from thought to speech or from sound to meaning.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Nativist/Innateness theories | Chomsky, Pinker |
| Behaviorist/Learning theories | Skinner |
| Cognitive development stages | Piaget |
| Emergentist approaches | Bates |
| Sociocultural/Social interaction | Vygotsky, Tomasello |
| Language-thought relationship | Slobin |
| Lexical/Word acquisition | Clark |
| Speech production models | Levelt |
Compare and contrast: How do Chomsky and Skinner differ in explaining how children acquire language? What evidence would support each view?
Both Vygotsky and Tomasello emphasize social interaction in language learning. What specific mechanisms does each theorist propose, and how do they differ?
If a child says "goed" instead of "went," which theorist's ideas best explain this error—Skinner's or Chomsky's? Why?
How would Piaget and Bates each explain the relationship between language development and general cognitive abilities? What do they share, and where do they diverge?
An FRQ asks you to explain how language might influence thought. Which theorist provides the most direct framework for answering this, and what is their key hypothesis?