Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Public relations didn't emerge fully formed—it was built by practitioners who responded to the communication challenges of their eras, from industrial-age corporate scandals to civil rights movements to the rise of global media. Understanding who shaped PR and why their contributions mattered helps you see the field as an evolving discipline with competing philosophies about ethics, persuasion, and the relationship between organizations and publics.
You're being tested on more than names and dates. Exam questions will ask you to connect practitioners to the theoretical foundations they established—concepts like two-way communication, earned media, crisis management, and ethical standards. Don't just memorize who did what; know which principles each practitioner championed and how their innovations addressed specific communication problems. That's what separates a passing answer from an excellent one.
These practitioners transformed publicity work into a recognized profession by establishing its first theories, tools, and ethical debates. Their competing approaches—manipulation vs. transparency—still define tensions in PR today.
Compare: Ivy Lee vs. Edward Bernays—both founded modern PR, but Lee emphasized transparency and factual disclosure while Bernays focused on psychological persuasion and manufactured consent. If an FRQ asks about ethical tensions in PR's origins, this contrast is your anchor.
These practitioners elevated PR from a tactical function to a strategic management discipline, establishing ethical frameworks that guide professional practice today.
Compare: Arthur W. Page vs. Edward Bernays—both elevated PR's strategic importance, but Page emphasized ethical conduct and management integration while Bernays focused on persuasion techniques. Page's framework is what modern corporate PR departments cite when discussing values-based communication.
These practitioners created the organizational structures and methodologies that define how PR agencies operate globally, introducing research-driven and relationship-centered approaches.
Compare: Harold Burson vs. Daniel J. Edelman—both built global agencies, but Burson emphasized research and measurement while Edelman focused on trust and earned media relationships. Both approaches now coexist as industry standards.
These practitioners challenged the field's exclusionary history by creating space for underrepresented voices and demonstrating that effective communication requires understanding diverse audiences.
Compare: Moss Kendrix vs. Inez Kaiser—both pioneered multicultural PR, but Kendrix focused on corporate campaigns targeting Black consumers while Kaiser emphasized community advocacy and mentorship. Together, they established that diversity isn't just ethical—it's strategically essential.
This practitioner pushed PR toward integration with other communication disciplines, reflecting the field's evolution toward holistic brand management.
Compare: Patrick Jackson vs. Harold Burson—both shaped crisis communication, but Jackson emphasized integration across disciplines while Burson focused on research-driven agency methodology. Jackson's holistic approach anticipated today's integrated marketing communication models.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Transparency and ethical disclosure | Ivy Lee, Arthur W. Page |
| Psychological persuasion techniques | Edward Bernays, Doris Fleischman |
| Management integration | Arthur W. Page, Patrick Jackson |
| Research and measurement | Harold Burson |
| Earned media and trust-building | Daniel J. Edelman |
| Multicultural and inclusive PR | Moss Kendrix, Inez Kaiser |
| Professional standards and education | Betsy Plank, Patrick Jackson |
| Crisis communication | Harold Burson, Patrick Jackson |
Compare and contrast: How did Ivy Lee's approach to corporate communication differ from Edward Bernays's? Which practitioner's philosophy aligns more closely with modern ethical standards, and why?
Which two practitioners are most associated with establishing professional ethical frameworks in PR, and what specific contributions did each make?
If an FRQ asked you to explain how PR became integrated into executive management, which practitioner would you cite, and what principles would you reference?
Moss Kendrix and Inez Kaiser both advanced multicultural PR. What distinct contributions did each make, and how did their work demonstrate that diversity improves communication effectiveness?
Which practitioners pioneered the agency model that dominates PR today, and how did their approaches to measurement and relationship-building differ?