Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Political journalists don't just report the news—they shape how Americans understand power, government, and democracy itself. When you study influential journalists for AP Media Politics, you're really learning about the press as a political institution: how it sets agendas, frames issues, holds officials accountable, and sometimes becomes part of the story itself. These figures demonstrate core concepts like gatekeeping, agenda-setting, the watchdog function, and media bias.
The journalists on this list represent different eras, platforms, and approaches to covering politics. Some built public trust through objectivity; others challenged that very notion. Some broke scandals that toppled presidents; others pioneered new forms of commentary that blurred the line between news and opinion. Don't just memorize names and dates—know what role each journalist played in the media-politics relationship and what their work reveals about press freedom, accountability, and the evolution of American media.
The rise of television transformed political journalism by putting reporters directly into American living rooms. These pioneers established the norms of objectivity, authority, and credibility that defined broadcast news for decades.
Compare: Cronkite vs. Murrow—both built broadcast journalism's credibility, but Murrow was confrontational while Cronkite embodied detached authority. If an FRQ asks about media challenging government power, Murrow is your example; for media as trusted institution, use Cronkite.
The watchdog function represents journalism's role in checking government power through investigation and exposure. These journalists exemplify how the press can serve as an unofficial "fourth branch" of government.
Compare: Woodward/Bernstein vs. Greenwald—both exposed government secrets, but Woodward and Bernstein worked within traditional media institutions while Greenwald operates as an independent critic of those institutions. This contrast illustrates the tension between mainstream and alternative media.
Some journalists wield influence not through investigation but through direct confrontation with political figures. The political interview becomes a site of accountability, where journalists press officials to answer for their actions and statements.
Compare: Russert vs. Cooper—both conducted tough interviews, but Russert relied on data and preparation while Cooper emphasizes emotional authenticity. This reflects a broader shift in what audiences expect from political journalism.
The rise of cable news created space for journalists who blend reporting with explicit ideological perspective. These figures raise important questions about objectivity, partisan media, and audience fragmentation.
Compare: Maddow vs. Kelly—both are prominent women in cable news who built audiences through strong personalities, but they represent opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. Their careers illustrate partisan media fragmentation and how audiences self-select into ideological bubbles.
Some journalists gain influence by rejecting traditional journalistic conventions entirely. Their work raises questions about what counts as journalism and whether objectivity is possible—or even desirable.
Compare: Thompson vs. Murrow—both challenged powerful institutions, but Murrow did so from within the mainstream while Thompson rejected mainstream conventions entirely. This contrast illustrates the spectrum from institutional to alternative journalism.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Watchdog function / accountability | Woodward & Bernstein, Greenwald, Maddow |
| Broadcast authority and trust | Cronkite, Murrow, Russert |
| Challenging government power | Murrow (McCarthyism), Greenwald (NSA), Woodward & Bernstein (Watergate) |
| Partisan/opinion journalism | Maddow, Kelly, Thompson |
| Interview as accountability tool | Russert, Amanpour, Cooper |
| Alternative/independent media | Greenwald, Thompson |
| International and crisis reporting | Amanpour, Cooper |
| Media evolution and platform shifts | Kelly (Fox to NBC), Greenwald (mainstream to independent) |
Which two journalists best illustrate the watchdog function of the press, and what government actions did their reporting expose?
Compare and contrast how Cronkite and Maddow represent different eras of broadcast journalism. What does the shift from one style to the other reveal about changes in American media?
If an FRQ asked you to explain how the press can serve as a check on government power, which journalist would you use as your primary example and why?
How do Russert and Thompson represent opposite approaches to political journalism? What does each approach assume about objectivity?
Identify two journalists from this list who illustrate media fragmentation or the rise of partisan news. How do their careers demonstrate this concept?