Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Performance art sits at the heart of Performance Studies because it makes visible the core questions the field asks: What counts as a performance? Where does the performer end and the audience begin? How does the body communicate meaning? These works aren't just art history—they're case studies in liveness, presence, risk, and spectatorship. When you analyze these pieces, you're practicing the same critical skills you'll need for any performance analysis, whether it's a protest, a ritual, or a TikTok video.
You're being tested on your ability to identify the mechanisms that make performance work: how artists use duration, the body, audience participation, and transgression to create meaning. Don't just memorize titles and dates—know what concept each piece best illustrates. If an exam asks about the ethics of spectatorship or the body as medium, you need to pull the right example instantly.
Durational performance tests the limits of attention, endurance, and human connection. By extending performance across hours, days, or even years, these artists force audiences to confront time itself as material.
Compare: Abramović vs. Hsieh—both use extreme duration, but Abramović emphasizes relational presence (face-to-face encounter) while Hsieh emphasizes solitary endurance (the body against time). If asked about duration in performance, Abramović is your example for connection; Hsieh is your example for isolation and labor.
Some performers use physical danger or transgression to shock audiences into awareness. Risk forces the question: What are we willing to witness? What does our spectatorship make us complicit in?
Compare: Burden vs. Schneemann—both use bodily risk, but Burden's violence is external (inflicted upon him) while Schneemann's transgression is internal (emerging from within her body). Both implicate the audience, but Schneemann explicitly genders that implication.
These works dissolve the fourth wall entirely, making spectators into co-creators—or co-conspirators. Participation shifts responsibility; the audience can no longer claim innocence.
Compare: Ono vs. Kaprow—both require audience participation, but with radically different power dynamics. Ono's participation enables harm (the audience acts upon her); Kaprow's participation enables co-creation (the audience acts alongside him). Ono exposes the violence latent in spectatorship; Kaprow celebrates its creative potential.
Some performers use objects, animals, or sustained symbolic gestures to create meaning that operates more like ritual than theater. These works draw on anthropological ideas about performance as transformation.
Compare: Beuys vs. Klein—both use bodies other than their own (animal, human) as artistic material, but Beuys frames this as spiritual exchange while Klein frames it as aesthetic production. Both raise questions about exploitation: Does the coyote consent? Do the models?
These works expand performance beyond the body alone, incorporating technology, storytelling, and multiple art forms. They anticipate contemporary performance's integration with digital media.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Duration and endurance | Abramović ("The Artist is Present"), Hsieh ("One Year Performance" series) |
| Physical risk and transgression | Burden ("Shoot"), Schneemann ("Interior Scroll"), Acconci ("Seedbed") |
| Audience participation | Ono ("Cut Piece"), Kaprow ("18 Happenings in 6 Parts") |
| Gender and the female body | Ono ("Cut Piece"), Schneemann ("Interior Scroll") |
| Spectatorship and complicity | Ono ("Cut Piece"), Burden ("Shoot"), Acconci ("Seedbed") |
| Ritual and symbolic action | Beuys ("I Like America and America Likes Me"), Klein ("Anthropometries") |
| Body as medium/material | Klein ("Anthropometries"), Schneemann ("Interior Scroll"), Burden ("Shoot") |
| Multimedia/technology | Anderson ("United States") |
Which two works best illustrate durational performance, and how do they differ in what duration reveals about the performer-audience relationship?
If an FRQ asks you to analyze audience complicity in performance, which piece would you choose and why? What specific mechanism makes spectators complicit?
Compare and contrast how Ono's "Cut Piece" and Kaprow's "18 Happenings" use audience participation. What does each work suggest about the ethics of spectatorship?
Which works would you cite to argue that the body itself is a medium in performance art? How does each artist use the body differently?
Beuys and Klein both use bodies other than their own in their performances. What questions about authorship, consent, and exploitation do these works raise, and how do they answer them differently?