Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you study journalism history, you're really studying how information reaches the public—and who controls that flow. These publishers didn't just print papers; they made fundamental decisions about what counts as news, who gets to read it, and whether journalism serves democracy or profits. The tensions they navigated—sensationalism versus integrity, accessibility versus quality, business interests versus public good—are the same tensions journalists grapple with today.
You're being tested on your ability to trace how journalistic principles evolved through the decisions of real people. Don't just memorize names and dates—know what each publisher represents conceptually. Can you explain why the penny press democratized information? Why yellow journalism raises ethical red flags? Why objective reporting emerged as a counter-movement? These are the analytical connections that earn top scores on exams.
Before the 1830s, newspapers cost six cents and targeted wealthy elites. The penny press transformed journalism into a mass medium, proving that affordability plus engaging content equals explosive readership growth. This shift fundamentally changed who participated in public discourse.
Compare: Benjamin Day vs. Horace Greeley—both made newspapers affordable, but Day prioritized entertainment and profit while Greeley used accessibility to advance political causes. If an FRQ asks about the penny press's democratic potential, Greeley is your strongest example of journalism as civic education.
Yellow journalism prioritized emotional impact over factual accuracy, using dramatic headlines, illustrations, and scandal to drive sales. This era reveals journalism's power to shape public opinion—and the ethical dangers when that power goes unchecked.
Compare: Pulitzer vs. Hearst—both practiced yellow journalism, but Pulitzer balanced sensationalism with genuine muckraking reform, while Hearst more fully embraced entertainment and political manipulation. Know this distinction: Pulitzer's legacy includes journalism awards; Hearst's includes "Citizen Kane" as a cautionary tale.
As a direct response to yellow journalism's excesses, a new generation of publishers championed factual accuracy, verification, and separation of news from opinion. This movement established the professional standards that define mainstream journalism today.
Compare: Adolph Ochs vs. Joseph Pulitzer—both built influential papers, but Ochs explicitly defined his mission against Pulitzer's sensationalism. This tension between "engagement" and "integrity" is foundational to journalism ethics. FRQs often ask you to evaluate these competing approaches.
These publishers recognized that controlling multiple outlets multiplied influence. They pioneered newspaper chains, syndicates, and cross-platform ownership—business innovations that raised enduring questions about media consolidation and editorial independence.
Compare: E.W. Scripps vs. Rupert Murdoch—both built media empires, but Scripps emphasized public-interest journalism for working-class readers while Murdoch prioritized profit and political influence. This comparison illustrates how business models shape editorial values.
The Watergate era demonstrated journalism's constitutional role as a check on government power. Investigative reporting that exposes corruption represents journalism's highest democratic function—and requires publishers willing to accept legal and financial risks.
Compare: Katharine Graham vs. Adolph Ochs—both built The Times and The Post into papers of record, but Graham's legacy centers on courage under pressure while Ochs's centers on establishing professional standards. Graham shows that principles mean nothing without the willingness to defend them.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Penny Press / Democratizing Access | Benjamin Day, Horace Greeley |
| Yellow Journalism / Sensationalism | William Randolph Hearst, Joseph Pulitzer |
| Objective Journalism / Professional Standards | Adolph Ochs, James Gordon Bennett Sr. |
| Media Empires / Consolidation | Rupert Murdoch, E.W. Scripps, Robert R. McCormick |
| Investigative / Accountability Journalism | Katharine Graham, Joseph Pulitzer |
| Press Freedom Advocacy | Katharine Graham, Robert R. McCormick |
| Journalism as Reform Platform | Horace Greeley, E.W. Scripps |
| Business Model Innovation | Benjamin Day, James Gordon Bennett Sr. |
Which two publishers are most associated with yellow journalism, and what key difference in their legacies should you remember for exam essays?
How did the penny press change journalism's relationship with democracy? Identify two publishers who represent different visions of what affordable news should accomplish.
Compare and contrast Adolph Ochs's approach to journalism with William Randolph Hearst's. What fundamental disagreement about journalism's purpose does this comparison reveal?
If an FRQ asks you to discuss journalism's role in holding government accountable, which publisher provides the strongest twentieth-century example, and what specific events demonstrate this?
E.W. Scripps and Rupert Murdoch both built media empires. What different values did their empires reflect, and what does this comparison suggest about the relationship between business models and editorial content?