Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Understanding who shaped music psychology isn't just about memorizing names—it's about grasping the core questions that define this field. When you study these researchers, you're learning the foundational frameworks for auditory perception, emotional response, neural processing, and cognitive development. Each psychologist represents a different lens through which we understand the music-mind connection, and exam questions will test whether you can match researchers to their theoretical contributions and experimental approaches.
These figures didn't work in isolation; their ideas build on and sometimes challenge each other. You're being tested on your ability to connect specific research findings to broader psychological principles—how does Deutsch's perceptual work relate to Krumhansl's cognitive models? Why does Patel's language research matter for understanding musical universals? Don't just memorize who did what; know what concept each researcher's work demonstrates and how their contributions fit into the larger puzzle of music cognition.
These researchers focus on the fundamental question: how does the auditory system transform sound waves into meaningful musical experience? Their work reveals the mechanisms by which we parse, organize, and interpret acoustic information.
Compare: Deutsch vs. Peretz—both investigate how we perceive music, but Deutsch focuses on illusions in typical listeners while Peretz studies what happens when perception breaks down. If an FRQ asks about modularity of music processing, Peretz's amusia research is your strongest evidence.
This group investigates how the mind organizes and makes sense of musical patterns—the mental schemas, expectations, and representations that allow us to follow a melody or recognize a wrong note.
Compare: Krumhansl vs. Huron—Krumhansl maps what listeners expect (tonal hierarchies), while Huron explains why expectations matter emotionally (ITPRA). Together, they form a complete picture of expectation in music cognition.
These researchers use brain imaging and neurological methods to answer: where and how does the brain process music? Their work bridges psychology and biology.
Compare: Zatorre vs. Koelsch—both use neuroimaging, but Zatorre emphasizes reward and plasticity while Koelsch focuses on emotion and social connection. For questions about music's evolutionary purpose, Koelsch's social bonding work is particularly relevant.
These psychologists tackle the central mystery: why does music move us? Their research explains the mechanisms behind music's emotional power.
Compare: Sloboda vs. Levitin—Sloboda takes an empirical, feature-focused approach to emotion (which musical elements cause which responses), while Levitin emphasizes broader questions of identity and meaning. Sloboda for mechanism questions; Levitin for "big picture" discussions.
This research area asks: how does music relate to other cognitive abilities, and can musical training enhance non-musical skills?
Compare: Patel vs. Halpern—Patel focuses on transfer between music and language, while Halpern examines music's effects on general cognition. For questions about educational applications of music psychology, both are essential references.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Auditory perception and illusions | Deutsch, Peretz |
| Tonal cognition and expectation | Krumhansl, Huron |
| Neuroimaging and brain plasticity | Zatorre, Koelsch |
| Emotional response to music | Sloboda, Levitin, Koelsch |
| Music-language relationships | Patel, Peretz |
| Musical memory and imagery | Halpern, Deutsch |
| Social and evolutionary functions | Koelsch, Huron |
| Cognitive transfer and training effects | Patel, Halpern, Zatorre |
Which two researchers would you cite to explain both what listeners expect in tonal music and why those expectations create emotional responses?
If asked to discuss evidence that music and language are processed by separate brain mechanisms, whose research provides the strongest support, and what methodology did they use?
Compare Zatorre's and Koelsch's approaches to studying music in the brain—what questions does each prioritize, and how do their findings complement each other?
A student claims that musical training improves reading ability. Which researcher's theoretical framework best explains why this transfer might occur, and what is the framework called?
Contrast Sloboda's and Levitin's approaches to studying musical emotion—if an FRQ asked you to explain the specific musical features that trigger emotional responses, which researcher's work would you draw on, and why?