Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Media criticism isn't just academic theory—it's the toolkit you need to decode how messages shape beliefs, identities, and power structures. On exam day, you're being tested on your ability to connect specific critics to their signature concepts and apply those frameworks to analyze media texts. Understanding encoding/decoding, manufacturing consent, hyperreality, and the culture industry means you can dissect any media artifact and explain why it works the way it does.
These critics span nearly a century of thought, but they're all asking variations of the same questions: Who controls media? How does form shape content? What happens to meaning once it reaches audiences? Don't just memorize names and dates—know what theoretical lens each critic provides and when to deploy it. If an FRQ asks you to analyze media bias, Chomsky is your go-to; if it's about audience interpretation, reach for Hall or Barthes.
These critics argue that how media communicates matters as much as—or more than—what it says. The technological and formal properties of media fundamentally reshape human consciousness and social organization.
Compare: McLuhan vs. Postman—both focused on how media form shapes thought, but McLuhan was largely optimistic about electronic media's tribal connectivity while Postman warned it would destroy rational discourse. Use McLuhan for questions about technological change; use Postman for critiques of entertainment culture.
These thinkers examine who controls media and how that control serves elite interests. Media isn't neutral—it's a site of ideological struggle shaped by ownership, economics, and institutional pressures.
Compare: Chomsky vs. Adorno—both see media serving powerful interests, but Chomsky focuses on news media and political manipulation while Adorno targets entertainment and cultural commodification. Chomsky emphasizes conscious elite coordination; Adorno sees systemic structural effects.
These critics shift focus from producers to audiences, arguing that meaning isn't simply transmitted but actively constructed through interpretation. Readers and viewers negotiate, resist, and transform media messages.
Compare: Hall vs. Barthes—both emphasize audience agency in meaning-making, but Hall retains focus on power dynamics and the struggle over interpretation, while Barthes is more interested in the structural play of signs. Hall is better for analyzing media's political effects; Barthes for close textual analysis.
These thinkers analyze whose stories get told and how media representations shape social identities and hierarchies. Media doesn't just reflect society—it actively constructs categories of race, gender, class, and difference.
Compare: bell hooks vs. Sontag—both critique visual culture's power, but hooks centers identity and marginalization while Sontag focuses on ethics and aesthetics of representation. Use hooks for questions about diversity and stereotypes; Sontag for photography and visual ethics.
These theorists argue that contemporary media has fundamentally altered the relationship between representation and reality. In a media-saturated world, simulations may become more real than reality itself.
Compare: Baudrillard vs. Benjamin—both analyze reproduction and authenticity, but Benjamin saw mechanical reproduction as democratizing while Baudrillard sees simulation as eliminating the real entirely. Benjamin retains hope for political art; Baudrillard is more pessimistic about escaping the image-world.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Medium shapes message | McLuhan, Postman, Benjamin |
| Political economy/propaganda | Chomsky, Adorno |
| Audience interpretation | Hall, Barthes |
| Race/gender representation | bell hooks, Hall |
| Visual culture/photography | Sontag, Benjamin |
| Simulation/postmodernity | Baudrillard |
| Culture industry/commodification | Adorno, Baudrillard |
| Semiotics/signs | Barthes, Baudrillard |
Which two critics both emphasize audience agency in creating meaning, and how do their approaches differ in terms of power analysis?
If an FRQ asks you to analyze how news media serves elite interests, which critic's framework would you apply, and what key concepts would you use?
Compare McLuhan's and Postman's views on electronic media—what do they share, and where do they fundamentally disagree?
How would bell hooks and Susan Sontag approach the same photograph differently? What questions would each ask?
Explain how Baudrillard's concept of hyperreality extends or challenges Benjamin's earlier analysis of mechanical reproduction—what changed between their eras?