Why This Matters
Ethnomusicology isn't just about cataloging songs from around the world—it's about understanding how music functions as a cultural system. When you study these influential figures, you're tracing the evolution of a discipline that asks fundamental questions: Why do people make music? How does sound encode meaning? What happens when musical traditions collide, merge, or disappear? These scholars developed the theoretical frameworks and methodological approaches that transformed music study from a Western-centric endeavor into a truly global, anthropologically-grounded field.
On exams, you're being tested on more than names and dates. You need to understand the key concepts each scholar introduced—bi-musicality, acoustemology, cultural equity, cantometrics—and how their fieldwork regions shaped their theoretical contributions. Don't just memorize that Bruno Nettl studied Native American music; know that his work exemplifies the integration of anthropological methods into musicological research. Each ethnomusicologist on this list represents a specific approach to the central question: What is the relationship between music and culture?
Founders and Field-Definers
These scholars established ethnomusicology as a distinct discipline, creating its foundational terminology, methods, and institutional structures. Their work legitimized the study of non-Western music as academically rigorous and culturally significant.
Jaap Kunst
- Coined the term "ethnomusicology"—replacing the earlier, problematic label "comparative musicology" and signaling a shift toward cultural context
- Indonesian music specialist who conducted extensive fieldwork in Java and Bali, establishing Southeast Asia as a major area of study
- Integrated musicology with anthropology, laying theoretical groundwork that influenced generations of scholars
Mantle Hood
- Developed "bi-musicality"—the principle that ethnomusicologists should learn to perform the music they study, not just analyze it from a distance
- Founded the Center for World Music at UCLA, creating an institutional model for cross-cultural musical education
- Balinese gamelan expertise shaped his argument that deep practical engagement reveals insights unavailable through observation alone
Bruno Nettl
- Advocated for holistic ethnomusicology—insisting that musical analysis must integrate anthropological, historical, and social perspectives
- Native American music research demonstrated how indigenous musical systems operate on principles distinct from Western frameworks
- Authored foundational texts including Theory and Method in Ethnomusicology, which became essential reading for the field
Compare: Jaap Kunst vs. Mantle Hood—both focused on Indonesian music, but Kunst emphasized theoretical foundations while Hood prioritized performative engagement. If an FRQ asks about methodological approaches, Hood's bi-musicality represents participant-observation taken to its logical extreme.
Archivists and Advocates for Cultural Equity
These scholars recognized that musical traditions were disappearing and took action—not just to preserve sounds, but to argue for the political and ethical importance of musical diversity.
Alan Lomax
- Pioneered folk music recording and archiving—his fieldwork across the American South, Caribbean, and Europe created invaluable audio documentation
- Developed "Cantometrics"—a systematic method for analyzing and categorizing singing styles across cultures based on measurable vocal parameters
- Championed "cultural equity"—arguing that diverse musical traditions deserve protection and respect comparable to biodiversity conservation
Tran Van Khe
- Pioneered Vietnamese music scholarship—bringing systematic academic attention to a tradition largely overlooked by Western ethnomusicologists
- Preservation advocacy emphasized maintaining traditional Vietnamese music's integrity while engaging with global audiences
- Cultural expression framework positioned music as central to Vietnamese identity, particularly significant given colonial and wartime disruptions
Compare: Alan Lomax vs. Tran Van Khe—both dedicated to preservation, but Lomax developed analytical systems (Cantometrics) while Tran Van Khe focused on advocacy and cultural continuity within a specific tradition. Lomax's approach was comparative; Tran Van Khe's was deeply localized.
Theorists of Music and Social Meaning
These scholars pushed ethnomusicology beyond documentation toward deeper questions: How does music create and communicate meaning? What is music's role in forming identity and social bonds?
John Blacking
- Explored music's role in social identity—arguing that musical ability is universal and that all humans are inherently musical
- Venda fieldwork in South Africa provided rich ethnographic data showing how music structures social relationships and life transitions
- Introduced "musical meaning"—the concept that music conveys cultural values through structures that listeners learn to interpret
Steven Feld
- Developed "acoustemology"—the study of sonic ways of knowing, examining how sound and listening shape cultural experience and environmental awareness
- Kaluli research in Papua New Guinea revealed how rainforest soundscapes inform musical aesthetics, cosmology, and emotional expression
- Prioritized listening as methodology—arguing that ethnomusicologists must attend to how communities hear their world, not just what they perform
Timothy Rice
- Bulgarian folk music expertise demonstrated how socialist and post-socialist political contexts transform musical meaning and practice
- Contextual emphasis insisted that musical sounds cannot be understood apart from the social situations in which they occur
- Interdisciplinary integration modeled how musicology, anthropology, and cultural studies can productively inform each other
Compare: John Blacking vs. Steven Feld—both theorized music's relationship to culture, but Blacking emphasized social structure and identity while Feld focused on sensory experience and environment. Blacking asks "What does music do for society?" Feld asks "How does sound shape consciousness?"
Regional Specialists and Deep Fieldworkers
These scholars committed to intensive, long-term engagement with specific musical cultures, producing detailed ethnographies that became models for the field.
Gerhard Kubik
- African music authority—conducted decades of fieldwork across Central and Southern Africa, documenting traditions from Angola to Malawi
- Theorized music-culture-society relationships—explored how musical structures reflect and reinforce social organization
- Methodological rigor combined musical transcription with ethnographic observation, setting standards for African music scholarship
Bonnie Wade
- South Asian music specialist—particularly Indian classical traditions, examining both Hindustani and Carnatic systems
- Music as cultural practice framework emphasized understanding performance contexts, patronage systems, and transmission methods
- Pedagogical contributions shaped how ethnomusicology is taught, developing curricula that balance theory with cultural immersion
Helen Myers
- South Asian fieldwork in India and Pakistan produced detailed accounts of regional and devotional music traditions
- Championed participant observation—insisting that ethnomusicologists must engage directly with communities, not study from a distance
- Advocated for women's perspectives—pushing the field to include female voices as both researchers and research subjects
Kay Kaufman Shelemay
- Ethiopian music expertise—documented liturgical, folk, and popular traditions both in Ethiopia and among diaspora communities
- Music and migration scholarship explored how displaced communities use music to maintain identity and negotiate belonging
- Ethical engagement model emphasized community collaboration and the researcher's responsibility to the people being studied
Compare: Gerhard Kubik vs. Kay Kaufman Shelemay—both conducted extensive African fieldwork, but Kubik focused on musical structures and social systems while Shelemay emphasized diaspora, migration, and ethical practice. Shelemay's work is particularly relevant for questions about globalization and displacement.
Music, Politics, and Ethics
These scholars foregrounded the political dimensions of music—how it intersects with power, identity, and the ethics of research itself.
Anthony Seeger
- Music-culture-politics intersection—examined how Brazilian indigenous and popular music engage with national identity and resistance
- Ethical responsibilities emphasis—argued that ethnomusicologists must consider how their work affects the communities they study
- Intellectual property advocacy addressed how traditional music should be protected from exploitation and appropriation
Martin Stokes
- Middle Eastern music specialist—particularly Turkish and Kurdish traditions, examining how music navigates ethnic and national tensions
- Music and identity politics explored how marginalized communities use music to assert presence and resist assimilation
- Globalization critique analyzed how local musical traditions adapt, resist, or transform under global cultural pressures
Jeff Todd Titon
- American folk music focus—studied how communities create, sustain, and transmit musical traditions across generations
- Participatory methodology insisted that research should involve collaboration with communities, not just study of them
- Dynamic cultural practice framework emphasized that traditions are living, evolving systems rather than static artifacts to preserve
Compare: Anthony Seeger vs. Jeff Todd Titon—both emphasized ethics and community engagement, but Seeger focused on intellectual property and representation while Titon developed participatory research methods. Both are essential references for exam questions about ethnomusicological ethics.
Quick Reference Table
|
| Foundational terminology and methods | Jaap Kunst, Bruno Nettl, Mantle Hood |
| Bi-musicality and performative engagement | Mantle Hood |
| Preservation and cultural equity | Alan Lomax, Tran Van Khe |
| Music and social identity | John Blacking, Martin Stokes |
| Acoustemology and sensory experience | Steven Feld |
| African music scholarship | Gerhard Kubik, Kay Kaufman Shelemay |
| South Asian music | Bonnie Wade, Helen Myers |
| Ethics and community engagement | Anthony Seeger, Jeff Todd Titon, Kay Kaufman Shelemay |
| Music and politics | Anthony Seeger, Martin Stokes |
| Interdisciplinary approaches | Bruno Nettl, Timothy Rice |
Self-Check Questions
-
Which two scholars both conducted fieldwork in Indonesia, and how did their methodological approaches differ?
-
If an FRQ asks you to explain how ethnomusicologists study the relationship between sound and cultural experience, which scholar's concept would you use, and what is that concept called?
-
Compare and contrast Alan Lomax's Cantometrics system with John Blacking's concept of musical meaning—what does each approach prioritize, and what might each miss?
-
Which three scholars would you cite in an essay about the ethical responsibilities of ethnomusicologists, and what specific contribution did each make to this discussion?
-
How do the regional specializations of Gerhard Kubik, Kay Kaufman Shelemay, and Martin Stokes reflect different theoretical concerns within ethnomusicology—what questions does each scholar's work help answer?