Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Edge computing represents a fundamental shift in how we architect intelligent systems—moving processing power from centralized data centers to the network's periphery, right where data is generated. Understanding the major players in this space isn't just about memorizing company names; you're being tested on your ability to recognize different architectural approaches, hardware vs. software specializations, and vertical integration strategies that define modern edge deployments.
These companies illustrate core edge computing principles: latency reduction, bandwidth optimization, data sovereignty, and the trade-offs between cloud-native and edge-native solutions. When you encounter exam questions about edge infrastructure, don't just recall what each company offers—know why their approach matters. A question about real-time inference at the edge points you toward GPU-focused solutions; a question about hybrid orchestration suggests cloud-platform providers. Master the underlying concepts, and the specific examples become powerful tools in your answer toolkit.
These hyperscalers built their edge strategies as natural extensions of their cloud ecosystems. The key principle here is seamless integration—they want edge deployments to feel like a local instance of their cloud, with consistent APIs, security models, and management tools.
Compare: AWS vs. Azure vs. Google Cloud—all three extend cloud services to the edge, but AWS emphasizes ecosystem integration, Azure prioritizes hybrid enterprise scenarios, and Google focuses on open-source flexibility. If an FRQ asks about vendor lock-in trade-offs in edge architecture, this comparison is your answer.
These companies approach edge computing from the data center outward, focusing on ruggedized hardware, converged systems, and enterprise management. Their edge solutions prioritize reliability and integration with existing IT infrastructure.
Compare: Dell vs. HPE—both offer converged edge infrastructure, but Dell emphasizes software partnerships while HPE focuses on industrial-grade hardware and flexible consumption models. For exam questions about edge deployment in manufacturing, either works, but HPE's OT focus makes it the stronger example.
For these companies, edge computing is fundamentally a network architecture problem. Their solutions prioritize low-latency connectivity, secure data transmission, and integration with existing network infrastructure.
Compare: Cisco vs. VMware—Cisco approaches edge from network hardware expertise while VMware brings virtualization and software-defined infrastructure. Cisco excels when the question involves IoT device connectivity; VMware is stronger for workload orchestration and multi-cloud scenarios.
These companies provide the computational foundation for edge AI. Without specialized hardware, real-time inference at the edge would be impossible—general-purpose CPUs simply can't deliver the performance-per-watt that edge deployments require.
Compare: NVIDIA vs. Intel—NVIDIA dominates when raw AI inference performance matters (autonomous vehicles, video analytics), while Intel's breadth allows optimization across diverse edge workloads. An FRQ about edge AI hardware trade-offs should reference both: NVIDIA for peak performance, Intel for flexibility and ubiquity.
IBM takes a distinct approach, focusing on autonomous management of edge deployments at scale. When you have thousands of edge nodes, manual administration becomes impossible—AI-driven operations become essential.
Compare: IBM vs. cloud hyperscalers—while AWS, Azure, and Google extend cloud management to the edge, IBM focuses on autonomous edge operations that minimize cloud dependency. For scenarios involving intermittent connectivity or edge-first architectures, IBM's approach offers advantages.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Cloud-native edge extension | AWS IoT Greengrass, Azure IoT Edge, Google Anthos |
| Hybrid cloud orchestration | Microsoft Azure Arc, VMware Edge, HPE GreenLake |
| Edge AI inference hardware | NVIDIA Jetson, Intel Movidius, Intel OpenVINO |
| Converged edge infrastructure | Dell EMC, HPE Edgeline |
| Network-centric edge | Cisco Edge Intelligence, VMware SD-WAN |
| Autonomous edge management | IBM Edge Application Manager |
| Open-source edge strategies | Google (Kubernetes), Intel (OpenVINO) |
| Industrial/OT edge solutions | HPE Edgeline, IBM, Cisco |
Which two companies would you compare when discussing the trade-off between GPU-accelerated AI performance and hardware flexibility at the edge?
If an enterprise requires edge computing that integrates seamlessly with existing on-premises data centers and supports regulatory compliance, which cloud provider's approach best addresses these requirements, and why?
Compare and contrast Dell Technologies and HPE's edge computing strategies—what architectural philosophy does each emphasize, and in what deployment scenario would you choose one over the other?
A manufacturing company needs to deploy AI-powered quality inspection across 500 factories with unreliable internet connectivity. Which company's autonomous management approach would you recommend, and what specific capability makes it suitable?
Explain why a company might choose Google Cloud's edge strategy over AWS's, specifically addressing concerns about vendor lock-in and development flexibility.