Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Developmental psychology isn't just a parade of names and dates—it's a toolkit for understanding how humans change across the lifespan. The AP exam tests your ability to connect specific theorists to their core mechanisms: cognitive construction, social interaction, attachment, environmental systems, and observational learning. You'll encounter these psychologists in multiple-choice questions that ask you to identify theories from scenarios, and in FRQs that require you to apply their concepts to real-world situations.
Here's the key insight: these theorists don't exist in isolation. They're often building on, challenging, or complementing each other's work. Piaget focused on the individual child constructing knowledge; Vygotsky argued that social interaction drives that construction. Bowlby established attachment theory; Ainsworth gave us the method to measure it. Don't just memorize who said what—know what principle each theorist represents and how their ideas connect to broader questions about nature versus nurture, continuity versus stages, and individual versus social influences on development.
These theorists tackled the fundamental question of how children develop the ability to reason, problem-solve, and understand their world. The core debate here centers on whether cognitive growth is primarily an individual construction process or a socially mediated one.
Compare: Piaget vs. Vygotsky—both studied cognitive development, but Piaget emphasized individual discovery while Vygotsky stressed social interaction and cultural context. If an FRQ describes a child learning through collaboration or guided instruction, Vygotsky is your answer; if it's about a child experimenting alone, think Piaget.
These theorists focused on how personality forms and evolves, emphasizing the interplay between internal drives and social experiences. The key distinction is whether development is driven by unconscious conflicts (Freud) or conscious social challenges (Erikson).
Compare: Freud vs. Erikson—both proposed stage theories, but Freud focused on psychosexual conflicts in early childhood while Erikson emphasized psychosocial challenges across the entire lifespan. Erikson was Freud's student but expanded the timeline and shifted focus from unconscious drives to social relationships.
Attachment theorists established that early caregiver relationships create templates for all future social and emotional functioning. The biological basis of attachment and its long-term consequences are frequently tested concepts.
Compare: Bowlby vs. Ainsworth—Bowlby developed the theoretical framework for attachment; Ainsworth provided the empirical methodology to test it. Know that Ainsworth's Strange Situation is the classic research paradigm for measuring attachment, while Bowlby explains why attachment matters evolutionarily.
These theorists shifted focus from individual development to the broader contexts that shape it. Understanding that development occurs within nested systems of influence is essential for analyzing complex scenarios.
Compare: Bronfenbrenner vs. Baumrind—both emphasize environmental influences, but Bronfenbrenner examines multiple systems from family to culture, while Baumrind focuses specifically on parenting practices within the microsystem. An FRQ about cultural or policy influences calls for Bronfenbrenner; one about parent-child dynamics calls for Baumrind.
These theorists examined how we acquire behaviors and moral reasoning through observation and cognitive maturation. The mechanisms of learning through modeling and the stages of moral reasoning are high-frequency test topics.
Compare: Bandura vs. Kohlberg—Bandura explains how we acquire behaviors (including moral ones) through observation; Kohlberg explains how we reason about moral dilemmas through cognitive stages. Bandura focuses on behavioral learning; Kohlberg focuses on cognitive-moral judgment.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Cognitive stage theories | Piaget (individual construction), Kohlberg (moral reasoning) |
| Social/cultural influences on cognition | Vygotsky (ZPD, scaffolding) |
| Psychodynamic development | Freud (psychosexual), Erikson (psychosocial) |
| Attachment and early relationships | Bowlby (theory), Ainsworth (Strange Situation) |
| Environmental systems | Bronfenbrenner (ecological systems) |
| Parenting influences | Baumrind (parenting styles) |
| Observational learning | Bandura (social learning, Bobo doll) |
| Lifespan development | Erikson (eight stages from infancy to old age) |
Both Piaget and Vygotsky studied cognitive development—what is the fundamental difference in how each theorist explains how children learn?
If a child demonstrates secure attachment in the Strange Situation, what caregiver behavior would Ainsworth say produced this outcome, and what long-term effects would Bowlby predict?
Compare Freud's psychosexual stages with Erikson's psychosocial stages: How do they differ in terms of timeline, driving forces, and emphasis on social relationships?
A student watches a classmate get praised for helping others and begins helping more frequently. Which theorist's concept best explains this, and what would that theorist call this type of learning?
Using Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Systems Theory, identify which system each of the following belongs to: (a) a child's family, (b) a new national education policy, (c) the relationship between a child's parents and teachers.