Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
The 20th century represents the most radical transformation in Western dance history, and understanding why these choreographers broke from tradition is central to exam success. You're being tested on more than names and dates. You need to grasp the underlying principles: rejection of classical constraints, the relationship between movement and meaning, cultural representation, and the integration of dance with other art forms. Each choreographer on this list represents a distinct philosophical approach to what dance can be and do.
These artists didn't work in isolation. They responded to each other, borrowed techniques, and sometimes directly opposed one another's visions. When you study them, look for the threads connecting rebellion against ballet formalism, the embrace of personal expression, and the democratization of dance as an art form. Don't just memorize who created what. Know what conceptual shift each choreographer represents and how their innovations built upon or challenged what came before.
These choreographers rejected the rigid vocabulary of classical ballet, arguing that dance should emerge from natural human movement and emotional truth. Their fundamental innovation was prioritizing internal experience over external form.
Duncan is widely called the "mother of modern dance." She rejected pointe shoes, corsets, and codified ballet positions in favor of bare feet and flowing tunics. Her natural movement philosophy drew from ancient Greek art, ocean waves, and the organic rhythms of music rather than imposed technique. She also saw dance as a vehicle for personal liberation and political change, making her an early advocate for dance as social expression. Virtually every modern dance artist who followed owes something to the space she opened up.
Graham didn't just reject ballet; she built a complete alternative system. Graham Technique is organized around the principle of contraction and release, a breath-based movement cycle originating from the pelvis and solar plexus. Her choreography was defined by psychological exploration. Works like Lamentation (1930) and Appalachian Spring (1944) externalized internal emotional states through angular, percussive movement that stood in direct contrast to ballet's flowing lines. Graham's technique and company established modern dance as a legitimate parallel tradition with its own training rigor.
Compare: Duncan vs. Graham: both rejected ballet, but Duncan sought freedom through flowing, improvisational movement while Graham created an equally rigorous alternative technique with codified vocabulary. If asked about the evolution of modern dance, Duncan represents the initial break; Graham represents its institutionalization.
Rather than abandoning ballet entirely, these choreographers transformed it from within, stripping away 19th-century theatrical conventions or integrating radical new ideas about structure and meaning.
Balanchine is the central figure in neoclassical ballet. He stripped away elaborate narratives, mime, and heavy costumes to emphasize pure movement and musicality. He co-founded New York City Ballet in 1948, establishing America as a major center for ballet and training generations of dancers in his aesthetic. His guiding philosophy, often summarized as "see the music, hear the dance," meant his choreography visualized musical structure, making the score and movement inseparable partners. Works like Serenade (1934) and Agon (1957) showcase this approach.
Nijinsky was a star dancer with the Ballets Russes whose choreographic career was brief but seismic. His choreography for The Rite of Spring (1913) caused a near-riot at its Paris premiere with its turned-in feet, hunched postures, and primitive angularity. In The Afternoon of a Faun (1912), he used radical two-dimensionality, rejecting ballet's depth and turnout for flat, frieze-like movement inspired by ancient Greek vase paintings. Though he created only a handful of works before mental illness ended his career, those pieces fundamentally challenged what ballet bodies could look like and do.
Compare: Balanchine vs. Nijinsky: both transformed ballet, but Nijinsky's angular primitivism shocked audiences by making ballet ugly, while Balanchine's sleek neoclassicism made it abstract. Nijinsky broke ballet's visual rules; Balanchine broke its narrative ones.
These choreographers questioned the fundamental assumptions about how dance should be created, structured, and experienced, often through radical collaboration with other art forms.
Cunningham introduced chance operations into choreography. Dice rolls and coin flips determined movement sequences, removing the choreographer's personal taste from structural decisions. He insisted on the independence of elements: dance, music (often composed by his longtime collaborator John Cage), and visual design existed as separate, simultaneous events rather than a unified expression. Dancers might not hear the music until opening night. His philosophy that any movement is dance democratized the body's vocabulary, treating everyday gestures as equally valid as virtuosic technique.
Compare: Graham vs. Cunningham: both shaped modern dance, but Graham believed movement must express emotion and meaning, while Cunningham argued movement is meaning, requiring no external reference. This is a fundamental philosophical divide in 20th-century dance theory.
These choreographers used dance explicitly as a vehicle for representing specific communities, addressing social issues, and centering marginalized experiences.
Ailey founded the Alvin Ailey American Dance Theater in 1958, and it became the foremost company celebrating African American cultural heritage through modern dance. His signature work, Revelations (1960), explores spirituality, sorrow, and joy through African American spirituals, gospel, and blues. It remains the most widely seen modern dance work in the world. Ailey's commitment to diversity extended beyond his own company; he insisted that dance institutions reflect America's multicultural reality, and his school and company continue that mission today.
Bausch developed Tanztheater (dance theater), a form that blends movement, spoken text, and theatrical staging to explore psychological and social realities. Her work is defined by repetition and everyday gesture: dancers walk, fall, dress, undress, and repeat actions obsessively, exposing vulnerability and ingrained human patterns. Her provocative staging addressed gender relations, violence, and loneliness through visually striking, often disturbing imagery. Works like Café Müller (1978) and The Rite of Spring (1975) are touchstones of this approach.
Compare: Ailey vs. Bausch: both used dance for social commentary, but Ailey celebrated communal identity and spiritual resilience, while Bausch exposed individual isolation and societal dysfunction. Both expanded what subjects dance could address.
These choreographers bridged concert dance and commercial entertainment, bringing sophisticated movement vocabulary to mass audiences while elevating the artistic status of musical theater.
Robbins was a true ballet-Broadway crossover artist. He worked simultaneously with New York City Ballet and on landmark shows like West Side Story (1957), bringing balletic technique to popular stages. His character-driven choreography used dance to reveal psychology and advance plot, not merely decorate scenes. The gang rivalries in West Side Story are told as much through movement as through dialogue. His integration of street movement with classical vocabulary made his work feel contemporary and accessible while maintaining technical rigor.
Fosse created one of the most instantly recognizable movement styles in all of dance. His signature vocabulary features turned-in knees, rolled shoulders, jazz hands, bowler hats, and isolated body parts moving in sharp, syncopated rhythms. Works for stage and film, including Chicago (1975), Cabaret (1972), and All That Jazz (1979), defined Broadway dance aesthetics for decades. Sensuality and cynicism pervaded his choreography, using dance to explore darker themes of ambition, corruption, and desire rather than the optimism typical of earlier musicals.
Compare: Robbins vs. Fosse: both revolutionized Broadway choreography, but Robbins integrated ballet's verticality and narrative clarity, while Fosse developed a low-centered, angular vocabulary emphasizing irony and sexuality. Robbins told stories; Fosse created atmospheres.
This choreographer exemplifies late-20th-century eclecticism, refusing to choose between traditions and instead synthesizing multiple vocabularies into something new.
Tharp's defining quality is genre fusion. She combined classical ballet, modern dance, jazz, and social dance into works that defied categorization. Her crossover success is remarkable: she choreographed for elite ballet companies (In the Upper Room for American Ballet Theatre) and for popular entertainment (the film Hair, the Broadway show Movin' Out). Her collaborative, improvisational process emphasized dancer individuality, producing work that felt spontaneous despite rigorous underlying structure.
Compare: Tharp vs. Cunningham: both challenged traditional choreographic methods, but Cunningham used chance to remove personal expression, while Tharp used improvisation to heighten individual dancer personality. Both questioned authorship differently.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Rejection of classical ballet | Duncan, Graham, Cunningham |
| Transformation of ballet from within | Balanchine, Nijinsky |
| Codified alternative technique | Graham (contraction/release), Fosse (isolations) |
| Chance and conceptual approaches | Cunningham |
| Cultural identity and representation | Ailey, Bausch |
| Integration of dance and theater | Bausch (Tanztheater), Robbins (narrative ballet) |
| Broadway/commercial innovation | Robbins, Fosse, Tharp |
| Genre fusion and postmodernism | Tharp |
Which two choreographers both rejected classical ballet but developed opposing philosophies about whether dance requires codified technique? What distinguished their approaches?
Identify the choreographers most associated with pure movement divorced from narrative or emotional expression. How did their methods for achieving this differ?
Compare and contrast how Ailey and Bausch used dance as social commentary. What communities or issues did each address, and what was their emotional tone?
If an essay question asked you to trace the evolution of American ballet in the 20th century, which choreographers would you discuss and in what order? What was each one's key contribution?
Which choreographers successfully bridged "high art" concert dance and popular entertainment? What techniques or philosophies allowed them to work across these worlds?