upgrade
upgrade

🗿Intro to Anthropology

Influential Anthropologists

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Anthropology isn't just about memorizing who studied whom—it's about understanding how different thinkers revolutionized the way we analyze human culture, society, and behavior. When you're tested on influential anthropologists, you're really being asked to demonstrate your grasp of theoretical frameworks, methodological innovations, and paradigm shifts that define the discipline. Each anthropologist represents a distinct approach to answering the fundamental question: what makes us human, and how do we study it?

Don't fall into the trap of treating this as a list of names and dates. Instead, focus on what problem each thinker was trying to solve and how their approach differed from others. Can you explain why Boas rejected evolutionary frameworks? Why Geertz thought Malinowski's methods weren't enough? These connections between thinkers—their debates, influences, and departures—are exactly what essay questions target. Know the concept each anthropologist represents, and you'll be ready for anything.


Founders and Framework Builders

These early thinkers established anthropology as a legitimate academic discipline and defined its core concepts. They moved the study of human societies from armchair speculation to systematic inquiry.

Edward Tylor

  • Defined culture comprehensively—his 1871 definition of culture as "that complex whole" became the discipline's foundational concept
  • Introduced animism as a theory explaining the origins of religion, the belief that spirits inhabit objects and natural phenomena
  • Championed cultural evolutionism, proposing that all societies progress through similar developmental stages

Lewis Henry Morgan

  • Systematized kinship studies through extensive research with Iroquois and other Native American nations
  • Proposed unilineal evolution—categorizing societies into stages of savagery, barbarism, and civilization
  • Influenced Marx and Engels, whose adoption of his ideas connected anthropology to political theory and social critique

Franz Boas

  • Rejected evolutionary ranking of cultures, establishing cultural relativism as anthropology's ethical and analytical foundation
  • Pioneered empirical fieldwork—insisted on learning local languages and conducting long-term, firsthand research
  • Dismantled scientific racism by demonstrating that human behavior is shaped by culture, not biology or race

Compare: Tylor/Morgan vs. Boas—all three helped establish anthropology, but Tylor and Morgan ranked cultures on evolutionary ladders while Boas insisted each culture must be understood on its own terms. If an FRQ asks about the shift away from ethnocentrism, Boas is your key figure.


The Functionalist Revolution

Functionalists asked a different question: instead of where did this practice come from, they asked what does this practice do for society? This shift transformed how anthropologists conducted and interpreted fieldwork.

Bronisław Malinowski

  • Invented participant observation—lived among Trobriand Islanders for years, setting the gold standard for ethnographic method
  • Developed functionalism, arguing that cultural practices exist to fulfill biological and psychological needs
  • Emphasized holistic analysis, showing how economics, kinship, and ritual interconnect within a single society

Ruth Benedict

  • Created the "culture patterns" concept, arguing each culture has a distinct configuration or personality type
  • Bridged anthropology and psychology, influencing the culture-and-personality school of thought
  • Demonstrated cultural integration—showed how beliefs, practices, and institutions form coherent wholes

Compare: Malinowski vs. Benedict—both functionalists who saw cultures as integrated systems, but Malinowski focused on how practices meet universal human needs while Benedict emphasized each culture's unique psychological character. Know this distinction for questions about functionalist variations.


Structuralism and Symbolic Analysis

These thinkers moved beyond observable behavior to analyze the underlying mental structures and symbolic systems that organize human thought and culture.

Claude Lévi-Strauss

  • Founded structuralism in anthropology, arguing that universal cognitive structures underlie all human cultures
  • Analyzed myths systematically, revealing binary oppositions (nature/culture, raw/cooked) that organize human thought
  • Connected anthropology to linguistics, applying Saussure's structural analysis to kinship systems and mythology

Mary Douglas

  • Decoded purity and pollution as symbolic systems that reflect and reinforce social boundaries
  • Analyzed ritual and taboo, showing how concepts of dirt and cleanliness organize social hierarchies
  • Applied structural analysis practically, examining everything from dietary laws to institutional behavior

Clifford Geertz

  • Pioneered interpretive anthropology, shifting focus from structures to meanings people attach to their actions
  • Introduced "thick description"—the method of analyzing behavior within its full cultural context
  • Emphasized culture as text, arguing anthropologists should read societies like literary critics read novels

Compare: Lévi-Strauss vs. Geertz—both analyzed symbols, but Lévi-Strauss sought universal structures of the human mind while Geertz insisted meaning is always local and particular. This is a classic exam contrast between structuralist and interpretive approaches.


Exchange, Economy, and Material Life

These anthropologists focused on how humans organize economic life and what material conditions reveal about social relationships.

Marcel Mauss

  • Transformed understanding of exchange through The Gift, showing that gift-giving creates binding social obligations
  • Introduced the concept of "total social phenomena"—practices that simultaneously involve economic, religious, and political dimensions
  • Influenced reciprocity theory, laying groundwork for understanding non-market economies

Marvin Harris

  • Developed cultural materialism, arguing that material conditions—environment, technology, economy—determine cultural beliefs
  • Challenged idealist explanations, proposing practical reasons for seemingly irrational practices like India's sacred cattle
  • Emphasized infrastructure, the material base that shapes social structure and ideology

Marshall Sahlins

  • Coined "original affluent society", arguing hunter-gatherers worked less and had more leisure than modern workers
  • Critiqued Western economic assumptions, showing that concepts like scarcity are culturally constructed
  • Demonstrated culture shapes economics—not the reverse, directly challenging Harris's materialism

Compare: Harris vs. Sahlins—both studied economics and culture, but Harris argued material conditions determine culture while Sahlins insisted culture shapes how we interpret material conditions. This debate (materialism vs. culturalism) frequently appears in theoretical questions.


Ritual, Performance, and Social Process

These thinkers analyzed how rituals and performances create, maintain, and transform social relationships.

Victor Turner

  • Developed liminality theory, analyzing the betwixt-and-between phase of rituals where normal social rules are suspended
  • Introduced communitas, the intense social bonding that occurs during liminal periods
  • Emphasized ritual as process, showing how ceremonies actively produce social change rather than merely reflecting it

Compare: Douglas vs. Turner—both analyzed ritual symbolism, but Douglas focused on how symbols maintain social boundaries while Turner emphasized how rituals temporarily dissolve and then reconstitute social structures. Know this for questions about ritual's conservative vs. transformative functions.


Applied and Critical Approaches

These anthropologists brought anthropological methods to urgent social issues and challenged the discipline's traditional boundaries.

Margaret Mead

  • Brought anthropology to public audiences, demonstrating that cultural knowledge could inform debates about education, gender, and child-rearing
  • Studied adolescence cross-culturally, arguing in Coming of Age in Samoa that teenage turmoil is cultural, not biological
  • Championed cultural diversity, showing how different societies construct gender and sexuality differently

Zora Neale Hurston

  • Documented African American folklore through rigorous fieldwork in Florida and the Caribbean
  • Combined anthropology with literature, using ethnographic methods to preserve oral traditions and cultural expressions
  • Challenged disciplinary boundaries, demonstrating that anthropologists could study their own communities

Nancy Scheper-Hughes

  • Founded critical medical anthropology, examining how poverty, inequality, and violence affect health outcomes
  • Advocated engaged anthropology, arguing researchers have ethical obligations to advocate for the communities they study
  • Exposed structural violence, showing how economic and political systems produce suffering in marginalized populations

Compare: Mead vs. Scheper-Hughes—both applied anthropology to social issues, but Mead focused on demonstrating cultural variation while Scheper-Hughes emphasizes power, inequality, and the anthropologist's ethical responsibility to act. This reflects the discipline's shift toward critical engagement.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Cultural RelativismBoas, Benedict, Mead
FunctionalismMalinowski, Benedict
StructuralismLévi-Strauss, Douglas
Interpretive AnthropologyGeertz
Cultural MaterialismHarris
Exchange and ReciprocityMauss, Sahlins
Ritual and LiminalityTurner, Douglas
Evolutionary Theory (Early)Tylor, Morgan
Applied/Critical AnthropologyMead, Hurston, Scheper-Hughes

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two anthropologists would you contrast to explain the debate between materialist and culturalist explanations of human behavior?

  2. How did Boas's approach to studying cultures differ from Tylor's and Morgan's evolutionary frameworks, and why does this shift matter for anthropological ethics?

  3. Compare Malinowski's functionalism with Geertz's interpretive approach—what question was each trying to answer, and what methods did they use?

  4. If an essay asked you to discuss how anthropologists have analyzed economic exchange outside Western market systems, which three thinkers would you draw on and why?

  5. Explain the difference between how Douglas and Turner understood the social function of ritual—one emphasizes boundary maintenance, the other emphasizes transformation. Which is which, and what evidence would you use?