Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you're studying agricultural economics, you're really exploring how ideas shape food systems—and these economists are the architects of those ideas. The AP exam tests your understanding of concepts like human capital theory, technological innovation, market structures, and food security frameworks. Each economist on this list represents a different lens for analyzing why agricultural systems succeed or fail, how policies affect farmers, and what drives productivity gains over time.
Don't just memorize names and dates—know what intellectual contribution each person made and how their ideas connect to broader economic principles. When an FRQ asks about agricultural development strategies or the role of government in food systems, you're being tested on these foundational frameworks. Understanding who argued what helps you construct stronger, more nuanced arguments.
These economists argued that investing in people—their education, health, and skills—matters as much as investing in land or machinery. The core insight: farmers aren't just laborers; they're decision-makers whose productivity depends on knowledge and capability.
Compare: Schultz vs. Heady—both focused on farmer decision-making, but Schultz emphasized why education improves decisions while Heady modeled how those decisions work mathematically. If an FRQ asks about improving agricultural productivity, Schultz gives you the policy angle; Heady gives you the analytical framework.
These thinkers focused on how new technologies transform agricultural output. Their key argument: productivity gains come from deliberate investment in research and development, not just market forces.
Compare: Ruttan vs. Borlaug—Ruttan theorized about why agricultural innovation happens; Borlaug actually created the innovation. Both are essential: Ruttan explains the system, Borlaug demonstrates the impact. Use Borlaug for concrete examples of technology's power; use Ruttan for explaining what conditions enable innovation.
These economists examined how government intervention shapes agricultural outcomes. The central debate: when do markets work for farmers, and when do they fail?
Compare: Johnson vs. Cochrane—a classic policy debate. Johnson trusted markets to deliver efficiency; Cochrane argued markets systematically disadvantage farmers due to the treadmill effect. This tension appears constantly in agricultural policy questions—know both sides.
These economists challenged mainstream assumptions, introducing concepts like power dynamics, population pressure, and social justice into agricultural analysis.
Compare: Boserup vs. Sen—both challenged conventional thinking about food crises. Boserup said population growth isn't the disaster Malthus predicted; Sen said food availability isn't the real problem in famines. Together, they shift focus from production to distribution and access.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Human capital in agriculture | Schultz, Heady |
| Technology and innovation | Borlaug, Ruttan |
| Market-oriented policy | Johnson, Gardner |
| Government intervention defense | Cochrane, Galbraith |
| Food access and entitlements | Sen |
| Population and intensification | Boserup |
| Gender in agricultural systems | Boserup |
| Green Revolution impacts | Borlaug, Ruttan |
Which two economists would you cite to argue both sides of the debate over government price supports in agriculture?
If an FRQ asks why famines occur even when food exists, which economist's framework should you use, and what is the key concept?
Compare Schultz and Borlaug: both improved agricultural productivity, but through fundamentally different approaches. What distinguishes their contributions?
How does Boserup's theory challenge traditional Malthusian assumptions about population and food supply?
An essay prompt asks you to explain why farmers adopt new technologies even when it hurts their long-term profits. Which economist developed a theory to explain this, and what is it called?