Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Incident response isn't just a checklist—it's the difference between a contained security event and a catastrophic breach that makes headlines. You're being tested on your understanding of how organizations systematically handle threats, from the moment something suspicious appears to the final documentation that prevents future attacks. The six-phase incident response lifecycle demonstrates core cybersecurity principles: defense in depth, least privilege, chain of custody, and continuous improvement.
What separates strong exam answers from weak ones is understanding the why behind each phase. Why does containment come before eradication? Why can't you skip straight to recovery? Each step builds on the previous one, and rushing or reordering them can destroy evidence, spread malware, or leave backdoors open. Don't just memorize the phase names—know what each phase accomplishes and how they connect to broader security frameworks like NIST.
These phases happen before an incident occurs. Strong preparation determines whether your response will be coordinated or chaotic.
Detection speed directly correlates with breach cost—the faster you identify an incident, the less damage occurs. This phase bridges preparation and active response.
Compare: Preparation vs. Identification—both involve documentation, but preparation creates proactive resources (plans, inventories) while identification generates reactive evidence (logs, IOCs). FRQs often ask how documentation serves different purposes across phases.
Once an incident is confirmed, these phases work to limit damage and eliminate the threat. The order matters—containment must precede eradication to prevent evidence destruction and threat spread.
Compare: Containment vs. Eradication—containment isolates the threat to prevent spread, while eradication removes it entirely. A contained system might still have malware present; an eradicated system is clean. If an FRQ asks why you can't skip containment, explain that premature eradication can alert attackers and destroy forensic evidence.
These final phases restore operations and transform the incident into organizational learning. Skipping lessons learned guarantees you'll face the same attack again.
Compare: Recovery vs. Lessons Learned—recovery focuses on operational restoration (getting systems working), while lessons learned focuses on capability improvement (getting better at responding). Both involve documentation, but for different purposes: recovery documents what was restored, lessons learned documents what was learned.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Proactive defense | Preparation (IRP, training, asset inventory) |
| Threat detection | Identification (SIEM, IOCs, classification criteria) |
| Damage limitation | Containment (isolation, network segmentation) |
| Threat elimination | Eradication (malware removal, patching, root cause) |
| Operational restoration | Recovery (staged restoration, validation testing) |
| Continuous improvement | Lessons Learned (PIR, documentation updates) |
| Evidence handling | Identification, Containment (chain of custody preserved) |
| Stakeholder communication | All phases (transparency throughout lifecycle) |
Phase ordering: Why must containment occur before eradication, and what risks arise if you reverse them?
Compare and contrast: Both Preparation and Lessons Learned involve updating documentation and training—how do their purposes differ within the incident response lifecycle?
Concept identification: Which two phases are most critical for maintaining chain of custody and supporting potential legal action?
Application: An organization discovers malware on a server but immediately wipes and rebuilds it to restore service quickly. Which phases did they skip, and what consequences might result?
FRQ-style: Explain how the incident response lifecycle demonstrates the principle of continuous improvement, citing specific activities from at least three phases.