Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Impressionism wasn't just a new painting style—it was a radical break from centuries of artistic tradition that changed how we see and represent the world. When you study these painters, you're exploring fundamental questions about perception, modernity, and artistic innovation that connect to broader themes in literature and culture. The movement emerged alongside industrialization, urbanization, and new technologies like photography, making it a perfect lens for understanding how art responds to social change.
You're being tested on more than names and paintings. Exam questions will ask you to analyze how technique reflects philosophy, why certain subjects mattered, and what distinguished individual artists within the movement. Don't just memorize that Monet painted water lilies—know why his approach to light revolutionized art and how his methods compare to peers like Renoir or Degas. Understanding the conceptual categories below will help you tackle any comparison or analysis question thrown your way.
These artists didn't just participate in Impressionism—they created its core principles and gave the movement its identity. Their techniques established the visual vocabulary that others would adopt and adapt.
Compare: Monet vs. Manet—both revolutionized French painting, but Monet focused on landscapes and light effects while Manet provoked through controversial figurative subjects. If an FRQ asks about Impressionism's origins, distinguish between Manet's conceptual rebellion and Monet's technical innovations.
These painters dedicated their careers to capturing nature's fleeting effects. Their work demonstrates how Impressionist technique served the goal of recording atmospheric conditions and seasonal change.
Compare: Sisley vs. Pissarro—both mastered landscape painting, but Sisley stayed faithful to traditional Impressionist methods while Pissarro experimented with Pointillism and engaged with social themes like working-class life. This contrast illustrates how artists within the same movement could diverge significantly.
These artists turned their attention to contemporary Paris—its streets, cafés, and social rituals. Their work captures the experience of modernity itself, reflecting industrialization and changing social structures.
Compare: Degas vs. Caillebotte—both depicted modern Parisian life, but Degas emphasized movement and intimate moments while Caillebotte focused on architectural space and urban geometry. Their different approaches show how "modern life" could mean very different things visually.
While some Impressionists focused on landscapes, these painters centered human figures—capturing social gatherings, intimate moments, and the warmth of personal relationships. Their work demonstrates Impressionism's capacity for emotional resonance.
Compare: Morisot vs. Cassatt—both focused on women's experiences and domestic life, but Morisot's brushwork is more atmospheric and suggestive while Cassatt's compositions are more structured and psychologically direct. Both challenge the idea that "women's subjects" were less significant than landscapes or public scenes.
These artists began with Impressionist principles but pushed beyond them, creating work that would inspire the next generation of modern art. Their evolution demonstrates both Impressionism's possibilities and its limitations.
Compare: Monet vs. Cézanne—both painted the same subjects repeatedly, but Monet explored changing light conditions while Cézanne sought underlying permanent structure. This fundamental difference explains why Monet remained an Impressionist while Cézanne became Post-Impressionism's foundation.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Light and atmosphere | Monet, Sisley, Pissarro |
| Modern urban life | Degas, Caillebotte, Manet |
| Leisure and social scenes | Renoir, Morisot |
| Women's experiences | Cassatt, Morisot, Degas |
| Movement precursors | Manet |
| Bridge to Post-Impressionism | Cézanne, Pissarro |
| En plein air technique | Monet, Sisley, Pissarro |
| Photography's influence | Degas, Caillebotte |
Which two painters best represent the contrast between capturing fleeting light effects versus seeking permanent underlying structure? What does this difference reveal about Impressionism's evolution?
Compare how Degas and Renoir depicted modern Parisian life. What subjects did each prefer, and what does this suggest about their different visions of modernity?
If an FRQ asked you to discuss women's contributions to Impressionism, which artists would you analyze and what specific innovations would you highlight?
Manet is often called a "precursor" rather than a true Impressionist. What distinguishes his work from painters like Monet or Sisley, and why does this distinction matter?
How did photography influence Impressionist composition? Identify two artists whose work shows this influence and explain the specific techniques they borrowed.