Important Security Audit Procedures

Why This Matters

Security audits aren't just checkbox exercises—they're the systematic process by which organizations discover what they don't know about their own defenses. When you're studying cybersecurity business concepts, you're being tested on your understanding of risk management frameworks, defense-in-depth principles, and compliance requirements. These audit procedures represent the practical application of those theoretical concepts, showing how businesses translate security policies into measurable outcomes.

The procedures covered here fall into distinct categories based on what they're designed to uncover: some identify what you have, others test whether your defenses actually work, and still others ensure you're meeting external obligations. Don't just memorize the names of these procedures—understand what type of security gap each one addresses and how they work together to create a comprehensive security posture. Exam questions often ask you to recommend the right procedure for a specific scenario, so knowing the purpose behind each one is essential.

---

Discovery and Baseline Procedures

Before you can protect assets, you need to know what you have and what threatens it. These foundational procedures establish the current state of your security environment and create the baseline against which all other audit findings are measured.

Risk Assessment

• Identifies threats and vulnerabilities—maps potential attack vectors against organizational assets to understand exposure
• Evaluates likelihood and impact using qualitative or quantitative methods to calculate risk scores for prioritization
• Drives resource allocation by helping leadership focus security investments on the most critical areas first

Asset Inventory

• Catalogs all hardware, software, and data—you can't protect what you don't know exists
• Classifies assets by sensitivity using categories like public, internal, confidential, and restricted
• Requires continuous updates because shadow IT and infrastructure changes can create blind spots between audits

Log Management and Analysis

• Centralizes security event data—aggregates logs from firewalls, servers, applications, and endpoints into a single repository
• Enables threat detection through correlation of events that might appear benign in isolation but indicate attacks when viewed together
• Supports forensic investigations and compliance by maintaining audit trails with appropriate retention periods

---

Technical Testing Procedures

These procedures move beyond documentation to actively probe your defenses. They answer the critical question: do your security controls actually work? The key distinction here is between automated scanning and human-driven testing.

Vulnerability Scanning

• Automated tools identify known vulnerabilities—scanners compare system configurations against databases like CVE (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures)
• Scheduled regularly (weekly or monthly) to maintain continuous visibility into security posture
• Prioritizes remediation by severity using scoring systems like CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) to rank findings

Penetration Testing

• Simulates real-world attacks—human testers attempt to exploit vulnerabilities the way actual adversaries would
• Tests defense effectiveness including detection capabilities and incident response procedures, not just technical controls
• Produces actionable recommendations with proof-of-concept exploits that demonstrate business impact to leadership

Network Security Assessment

• Evaluates infrastructure protections—examines firewall rules, network segmentation, and protocol configurations
• Identifies misconfigurations that create unintended access paths or expose internal systems to external threats
• Tests security tool effectiveness by validating that IDS/IPS, firewalls, and monitoring solutions perform as expected

---

Access and Authorization Procedures

The principle of least privilege underlies all access-related auditing. These procedures verify that people (and systems) can only access what they need—nothing more, nothing less. Excessive permissions represent one of the most common audit findings.

Access Control Review

• Validates user permissions against job roles—ensures access rights match current responsibilities, not historical ones
• Enforces least privilege by identifying and removing unnecessary access that accumulated over time
• Addresses personnel changes including role transitions, departures, and contractor access that often persist longer than needed

Physical Security Assessment

• Evaluates facility protections—reviews badge access, surveillance systems, and visitor management procedures
• Identifies environmental vulnerabilities including inadequate server room cooling, fire suppression, or flood risks
• Connects digital and physical security because physical access often bypasses technical controls entirely

---

Compliance and Governance Procedures

These procedures ensure the organization meets external obligations and internal standards. They're often driven by regulatory requirements, contractual obligations, or industry frameworks rather than purely technical concerns.

Compliance Checks

• Verifies adherence to regulations—confirms alignment with requirements like PCI-DSS, SOX, or industry-specific mandates
• Spans all departments because compliance obligations rarely stay contained within IT boundaries
• Documents findings formally with evidence collection that can withstand regulatory scrutiny or legal review

Policy and Procedure Review

• Assesses policy relevance and effectiveness—determines whether written policies reflect current technology and business realities
• Ensures regulatory alignment by mapping policies to specific compliance requirements and industry standards
• Triggers regular updates because outdated policies create gaps between documented procedures and actual practices

Data Protection and Privacy Audit

• Evaluates regulatory compliance for frameworks like GDPR, HIPAA, or CCPA depending on jurisdiction and industry
• Reviews data handling practices—examines how sensitive information is collected, stored, processed, and shared
• Identifies protection gaps in encryption, access controls, retention policies, and cross-border data transfers

---

Resilience and Response Procedures

Security isn't just about prevention—it's about maintaining operations when things go wrong. These procedures test your organization's ability to detect, respond to, and recover from security incidents and disasters.

Incident Response Plan Evaluation

• Reviews plan clarity and completeness—ensures roles, escalation paths, and communication procedures are documented and understood
• Uses tabletop exercises to simulate incidents and test decision-making without the pressure of a real attack
• Incorporates lessons learned from actual incidents and near-misses to continuously improve response capabilities

Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity Testing

• Validates recovery procedures—confirms that backup systems, failover processes, and restoration procedures actually work
• Measures recovery metrics including RTO (Recovery Time Objective) and RPO (Recovery Point Objective) against business requirements
• Updates plans based on test results and changes in infrastructure, applications, or business priorities

---

Human and Third-Party Procedures

Technical controls fail when people circumvent them or when trusted partners introduce risk. These procedures address the human element of security, which remains the most unpredictable variable in any security program.

Employee Security Awareness Evaluation

• Measures training effectiveness—assesses whether employees actually understand and follow security policies
• Identifies knowledge gaps through testing, surveys, or simulated phishing campaigns
• Drives targeted training because generic awareness programs often fail to change behavior

Third-Party Vendor Security Review

• Evaluates partner security practices—assesses whether vendors meet your security standards before and during relationships
• Monitors ongoing compliance because vendor security postures change and initial assessments become outdated
• Addresses supply chain risk which has become a primary attack vector as organizations increasingly depend on external services

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two procedures both involve testing security controls but differ in their use of automation versus human expertise? What are the tradeoffs between them?

2. If an organization discovers that former employees still have active system access, which audit procedure failed—and what principle should that procedure enforce?

3. Compare and contrast incident response plan evaluation with disaster recovery testing. In what scenario would you prioritize one over the other?

4. A company suffers a breach through a software vendor's compromised update. Which two audit procedures should have caught this risk, and why might they have missed it?

5. You're advising a company that has never conducted a security audit. Which three procedures would you recommend they complete first to establish a security baseline, and in what order? Justify your sequence.