Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
News values are the invisible criteria that determine which stories make the front page and which get buried—or never covered at all. Understanding these values isn't just about memorizing a list; you're being tested on your ability to recognize why certain stories dominate news cycles, how editorial decisions reflect audience priorities, and what ethical tensions arise when news values conflict with each other. These concepts connect directly to larger course themes around media literacy, gatekeeping, and the social responsibility of journalism.
When you encounter questions about news judgment, story selection, or media bias, you'll need to identify which values are at play and how they interact. Don't just memorize the terms—know what principle each value illustrates and be ready to apply them to real-world scenarios. A story about a local factory closing, for example, might hit proximity, impact, consequence, and human interest simultaneously. Your job is to recognize that layering.
These values prioritize stories based on when something happens and how quickly it demands attention. Journalists call this the "news peg"—the hook that makes a story relevant right now rather than next week.
Compare: Timeliness vs. Novelty—both create urgency, but timeliness is about when (recency) while novelty is about what (uniqueness). An FRQ might ask you to explain why a decades-old cold case suddenly becomes news again—that's novelty overriding timeliness.
These values measure how closely a story relates to the audience's identity, location, or lived experience. The closer the connection, the higher the engagement.
Compare: Proximity vs. Relevance—proximity is about where (geographic/cultural closeness) while relevance is about what matters (topical connection to audience concerns). A story can be geographically distant but highly relevant if it affects gas prices or supply chains locally.
These values assess the weight of a story—how many people it affects, how deeply, and what might happen as a result. Editors ask: "So what? Why should anyone care?"
Compare: Impact vs. Magnitude vs. Consequence—these overlap but aren't identical. Impact measures who's affected, magnitude measures how big, and consequence measures what happens next. A small protest (low magnitude) by influential figures (high prominence) that changes legislation (high consequence) illustrates how these values interact.
These values explain why certain stories grab audiences regardless of their civic importance. They tap into psychological triggers that make content inherently engaging.
Compare: Prominence vs. Conflict—prominence is about who (status of people involved) while conflict is about what's happening (tension or struggle). A celebrity divorce hits both values; a policy debate between unknown experts hits conflict but not prominence. Consider how outlets might manufacture conflict to compensate for lack of prominent figures.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Urgency/Timing | Timeliness, Novelty |
| Audience Connection | Proximity, Relevance, Human Interest |
| Scale of Effect | Impact, Magnitude |
| Future Stakes | Consequence |
| Psychological Engagement | Prominence, Conflict |
| Emotional Resonance | Human Interest, Conflict |
| Editorial Judgment Factors | All values weighed together |
| Potential for Bias | Prominence, Conflict (often overweighted) |
A hurricane is approaching a coastal city 2,000 miles away. Which news values would make this story more relevant to a local audience, and which would make it less relevant?
Compare and contrast impact and consequence. How might a story score high on one but low on the other?
Which two news values most often lead to criticism about media sensationalism, and why might editors overweight them despite ethical concerns?
A local teacher wins a national award for an innovative classroom technique. Identify at least four news values this story satisfies and explain how each applies.
If an FRQ asks you to analyze why a particular story dominated news coverage, what framework would you use to structure your response? Which values would you check first?