upgrade
upgrade

🎛️Newsroom

Important News Values

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

News values are the invisible criteria that determine which stories make the front page and which get buried—or never covered at all. Understanding these values isn't just about memorizing a list; you're being tested on your ability to recognize why certain stories dominate news cycles, how editorial decisions reflect audience priorities, and what ethical tensions arise when news values conflict with each other. These concepts connect directly to larger course themes around media literacy, gatekeeping, and the social responsibility of journalism.

When you encounter questions about news judgment, story selection, or media bias, you'll need to identify which values are at play and how they interact. Don't just memorize the terms—know what principle each value illustrates and be ready to apply them to real-world scenarios. A story about a local factory closing, for example, might hit proximity, impact, consequence, and human interest simultaneously. Your job is to recognize that layering.


Urgency-Based Values

These values prioritize stories based on when something happens and how quickly it demands attention. Journalists call this the "news peg"—the hook that makes a story relevant right now rather than next week.

Timeliness

  • Currency drives coverage—events happening now or within the past 24 hours take priority over older developments
  • Speed affects credibility; outlets that report first often set the narrative frame for competitors
  • Creates urgency that prompts audience action, whether that's tuning in, sharing, or responding publicly

Novelty

  • Unusual or unexpected events break through the noise precisely because they deviate from routine coverage
  • First-of-its-kind stories—new discoveries, unprecedented events, innovative breakthroughs—signal automatic newsworthiness
  • Challenges audience assumptions, which increases engagement and shareability across platforms

Compare: Timeliness vs. Novelty—both create urgency, but timeliness is about when (recency) while novelty is about what (uniqueness). An FRQ might ask you to explain why a decades-old cold case suddenly becomes news again—that's novelty overriding timeliness.


Audience Connection Values

These values measure how closely a story relates to the audience's identity, location, or lived experience. The closer the connection, the higher the engagement.

Proximity

  • Geographic closeness makes stories feel immediate—local news consistently outperforms distant events in audience metrics
  • Cultural or social proximity matters too; diaspora communities follow news from ancestral homelands
  • Emotional resonance increases when audiences can imagine themselves in the story's setting

Relevance

  • Direct connection to audience lives—stories addressing current concerns, interests, or daily realities get prioritized
  • Context-dependent value; what's relevant shifts based on political climate, cultural moment, or seasonal factors
  • Alignment with audience values increases likelihood of engagement, sharing, and sustained attention

Human Interest

  • Emotional storytelling that highlights individual experiences rather than abstract statistics or policy details
  • Personal narratives reflect broader themes—one family's struggle can illustrate systemic issues more powerfully than data alone
  • Builds empathy and connection, often serving as an entry point for audiences unfamiliar with complex topics

Compare: Proximity vs. Relevance—proximity is about where (geographic/cultural closeness) while relevance is about what matters (topical connection to audience concerns). A story can be geographically distant but highly relevant if it affects gas prices or supply chains locally.


Significance-Based Values

These values assess the weight of a story—how many people it affects, how deeply, and what might happen as a result. Editors ask: "So what? Why should anyone care?"

Impact

  • Breadth of effect—stories affecting large populations or having widespread consequences rise in priority
  • Potential to shift public opinion or behavior elevates importance beyond raw numbers
  • Depth matters too; a story profoundly affecting a small community can outweigh one mildly affecting millions

Magnitude

  • Scale determines prominence—major disasters, mass protests, or sweeping policy changes dominate headlines
  • Quantifiable elements (death tolls, dollar amounts, participation numbers) provide concrete hooks for coverage
  • Societal breadth considers how many sectors, regions, or demographics are touched by an event

Consequence

  • Forward-looking value—what will happen because of this event or decision?
  • Policy, behavioral, or perceptual changes that flow from a story justify sustained coverage
  • Helps audiences understand stakes, transforming passive consumption into informed citizenship

Compare: Impact vs. Magnitude vs. Consequence—these overlap but aren't identical. Impact measures who's affected, magnitude measures how big, and consequence measures what happens next. A small protest (low magnitude) by influential figures (high prominence) that changes legislation (high consequence) illustrates how these values interact.


Attention-Driving Values

These values explain why certain stories grab audiences regardless of their civic importance. They tap into psychological triggers that make content inherently engaging.

Prominence

  • Famous names attract eyeballs—celebrities, politicians, and major institutions guarantee audience interest
  • Status transfers to story; coverage of prominent figures is perceived as more important by default
  • Amplifies other values; a prominent person's involvement can elevate an otherwise minor story to headline status

Conflict

  • Disagreement creates narrative tension—struggles, confrontations, and debates engage audiences emotionally
  • Highlights societal fault lines, making abstract issues concrete and urgent
  • Drives story structure; journalists often frame complex issues as two-sided conflicts for clarity (sometimes problematically)

Compare: Prominence vs. Conflict—prominence is about who (status of people involved) while conflict is about what's happening (tension or struggle). A celebrity divorce hits both values; a policy debate between unknown experts hits conflict but not prominence. Consider how outlets might manufacture conflict to compensate for lack of prominent figures.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Urgency/TimingTimeliness, Novelty
Audience ConnectionProximity, Relevance, Human Interest
Scale of EffectImpact, Magnitude
Future StakesConsequence
Psychological EngagementProminence, Conflict
Emotional ResonanceHuman Interest, Conflict
Editorial Judgment FactorsAll values weighed together
Potential for BiasProminence, Conflict (often overweighted)

Self-Check Questions

  1. A hurricane is approaching a coastal city 2,000 miles away. Which news values would make this story more relevant to a local audience, and which would make it less relevant?

  2. Compare and contrast impact and consequence. How might a story score high on one but low on the other?

  3. Which two news values most often lead to criticism about media sensationalism, and why might editors overweight them despite ethical concerns?

  4. A local teacher wins a national award for an innovative classroom technique. Identify at least four news values this story satisfies and explain how each applies.

  5. If an FRQ asks you to analyze why a particular story dominated news coverage, what framework would you use to structure your response? Which values would you check first?