Why This Matters
Log analysis is the backbone of both proactive security monitoring and reactive forensic investigation. When you're analyzing a breach, responding to an incident, or hunting for threats, logs are your primary evidence source—they tell the story of what happened, when, and often how. You'll be tested on understanding not just what each technique does, but how they work together in a complete security workflow, from collection and normalization to correlation and forensic reconstruction.
Don't just memorize definitions here. Know which techniques address data preparation challenges versus threat detection goals versus legal and compliance requirements. Understanding the purpose behind each technique helps you answer scenario-based questions like "What should an analyst do first when investigating X?" or "Which technique would reveal Y type of attack?" Master the relationships between these techniques, and you'll be ready for any log analysis question thrown your way.
Data Preparation and Standardization
Before you can analyze anything, logs must be collected, formatted consistently, and time-aligned. These foundational techniques transform raw, chaotic data into usable evidence.
Log Collection and Aggregation
- Centralizes logs from multiple sources—network devices, servers, applications, and security tools feed into a single repository
- Enables comprehensive visibility by ensuring no critical data source is overlooked during monitoring or investigation
- Supports real-time analysis by streaming events to a central platform where correlation and alerting can occur
Log Normalization and Parsing
- Converts diverse log formats into a consistent structure—parsing extracts fields like timestamp, source IP, and event type from raw text
- Reduces analysis complexity by standardizing entries from firewalls, Windows Event Logs, Linux syslog, and application logs
- Enables cross-source queries since normalized fields can be searched uniformly regardless of origin
Time Correlation and Synchronization
- Aligns timestamps across all log sources—critical for establishing accurate event sequences during investigations
- Addresses NTP drift and time zone discrepancies that could otherwise make timeline reconstruction impossible
- Reveals attack progression by showing the exact order of events across compromised systems
Compare: Log normalization vs. time synchronization—both prepare data for analysis, but normalization addresses format consistency while synchronization addresses temporal accuracy. An FRQ might ask which you'd prioritize when logs come from systems in different countries (time sync) versus different vendors (normalization).
Threat Detection and Analysis
Once data is prepared, these techniques identify malicious activity by recognizing patterns, filtering noise, and connecting related events. This is where raw data becomes actionable intelligence.
Pattern Recognition and Anomaly Detection
- Identifies known attack signatures such as brute-force login attempts, SQL injection patterns, or malware callbacks
- Uses baseline comparison and machine learning to flag deviations from normal behavior—anomalies that signature-based detection would miss
- Enables proactive threat hunting by surfacing suspicious activity before alerts trigger
Log Filtering and Searching
- Reduces noise by excluding irrelevant entries—informational events, routine heartbeats, and known-good traffic
- Enables targeted investigation using Boolean queries, regular expressions, and field-specific searches
- Improves analyst efficiency by focusing attention on high-value events rather than scrolling through thousands of entries
Event Correlation and Analysis
- Links related events across multiple log sources—a failed login on a firewall, followed by successful authentication on a server, followed by data transfer
- Reveals attack chains that individual log entries would never expose in isolation
- Prioritizes alerts by scoring correlated events higher than single-source anomalies
Compare: Pattern recognition vs. event correlation—pattern recognition identifies individual suspicious events, while correlation connects multiple events into attack narratives. If an FRQ describes a multi-stage attack, correlation is your answer; if it asks about detecting a specific exploit, pattern recognition applies.
Forensic Investigation Techniques
When incidents occur, these techniques support detailed reconstruction and legal proceedings. Forensic analysis requires both technical accuracy and evidentiary integrity.
Forensic Timeline Creation
- Constructs chronological event sequences by merging timestamps from all relevant log sources into a unified timeline
- Maps attack progression from initial access through lateral movement, privilege escalation, and data exfiltration
- Supports legal proceedings by providing clear, defensible documentation of what occurred and when
Log Integrity and Tamper Detection
- Verifies logs haven't been altered or deleted—sophisticated attackers often target logs to cover their tracks
- Uses cryptographic hashing and write-once storage to ensure authenticity; hash chains detect any modification
- Alerts on suspicious log gaps such as missing entries during the timeframe of a suspected breach
Network Traffic Log Analysis
- Examines flow data and packet captures for unauthorized connections, data exfiltration, or command-and-control traffic
- Identifies lateral movement by tracking internal connections between systems that don't normally communicate
- Reveals bandwidth anomalies that may indicate large-scale data theft or DDoS participation
System and Application Log Analysis
- Reviews OS events including authentication attempts, privilege changes, process execution, and service modifications
- Detects misconfigurations and vulnerabilities such as disabled security controls or unauthorized software installations
- Supports root cause analysis by tracing errors and failures back to their origin
Compare: Network traffic logs vs. system logs—network logs show communication patterns between hosts, while system logs reveal what happened on individual hosts. A complete investigation requires both: network logs might show data leaving, system logs show what process sent it.
Intrusion Detection Integration
Specialized security tools generate their own logs that require dedicated analysis approaches. IDPS logs provide high-fidelity threat data but require context from other sources.
Intrusion Detection and Prevention Log Analysis
- Analyzes alerts from IDS/IPS sensors including signature matches, protocol anomalies, and blocked attacks
- Distinguishes true positives from false positives by correlating IDPS alerts with other log sources for validation
- Provides attack attribution data including source IPs, targeted vulnerabilities, and exploit techniques
- Centralizes all log management functions in a single platform—collection, normalization, correlation, alerting, and reporting
- Automates threat detection through pre-built correlation rules and machine learning models
- Integrates with SOAR platforms for automated incident response and threat intelligence enrichment
Compare: SIEM vs. individual log analysis techniques—SIEM combines collection, normalization, correlation, and alerting into one platform, while individual techniques can be performed manually or with specialized tools. Know that SIEM is the enterprise solution, but understanding component techniques helps you troubleshoot when SIEM rules fail.
Governance and Visualization
These techniques ensure log analysis meets organizational and legal requirements while communicating findings effectively. Security is only useful if it's compliant and understandable.
Log Retention and Archiving
- Establishes retention policies based on regulatory requirements (PCI-DSS: 1 year, HIPAA: 6 years, SOX: 7 years)
- Balances storage costs with investigative needs—hot storage for recent logs, cold storage for archives
- Ensures historical data availability for forensic investigations that may occur months after an incident
Compliance and Regulatory Requirements for Logging
- Mandates specific log types and retention periods—failure to comply can result in fines and legal liability
- Requires audit trails for access to sensitive data, administrative actions, and security events
- Facilitates external audits by maintaining organized, searchable, and tamper-evident log records
Log Visualization and Reporting
- Transforms complex data into dashboards and charts—timelines, heat maps, geographic displays, and trend graphs
- Generates executive summaries that communicate security posture to non-technical stakeholders
- Supports pattern identification by making anomalies visually obvious in ways raw text cannot
Compare: Retention policies vs. integrity controls—both support forensic validity, but retention ensures logs exist when needed, while integrity ensures logs are trustworthy. Compliance questions often test whether you understand that having logs isn't enough—they must be authentic.
Quick Reference Table
|
| Data Preparation | Log collection, normalization, time synchronization |
| Threat Detection | Pattern recognition, anomaly detection, event correlation |
| Search Optimization | Log filtering, Boolean queries, field-specific searches |
| Forensic Reconstruction | Timeline creation, system log analysis, network traffic analysis |
| Evidence Integrity | Tamper detection, cryptographic hashing, write-once storage |
| Enterprise Platforms | SIEM systems, IDPS integration |
| Governance | Retention policies, compliance requirements, audit trails |
| Communication | Visualization dashboards, executive reporting |
Self-Check Questions
-
Which two techniques must be completed before event correlation can be effective? Explain why each is a prerequisite.
-
An attacker compromised a system and deleted local logs before exfiltrating data. Which techniques would have prevented or detected this anti-forensic activity?
-
Compare and contrast pattern recognition with anomaly detection. When would each be more effective at identifying a novel attack?
-
A forensic investigator notices a 15-minute gap in firewall logs during the suspected breach window. Which technique addresses this concern, and what might the gap indicate?
-
Your organization must demonstrate to auditors that authentication logs from the past 18 months are complete and unmodified. Which three techniques or controls would you reference in your response?