Why This Matters
Construction management isn't just about keeping projects on track—it's the systematic application of engineering principles to the planning, coordination, and control of complex systems. When you're tested on these techniques, you're being asked to demonstrate understanding of how engineers balance competing constraints: time, cost, quality, and risk. These four variables form the foundation of virtually every construction management decision, and exam questions will probe whether you understand the tradeoffs between them.
The techniques in this guide fall into distinct categories based on what aspect of project delivery they optimize. Some focus on scheduling logic, others on resource efficiency, and still others on performance measurement. Don't just memorize definitions—know which technique addresses which constraint, and be ready to explain why a project manager would choose one approach over another in a given scenario.
Scheduling and Time Management
These techniques address the fundamental question: how do we sequence work to minimize project duration while respecting task dependencies? The underlying principle is that not all tasks are equally critical—some have flexibility (float), while others directly determine when the project finishes.
Critical Path Method (CPM)
- Identifies the longest sequence of dependent activities—this sequence determines the minimum possible project duration
- Float time (the amount a task can slip without delaying the project) reveals scheduling flexibility for non-critical activities
- Network logic enables "what-if" analysis when delays occur or acceleration is needed
Gantt Charts
- Visual timeline representation makes complex schedules accessible to all stakeholders at a glance
- Progress tracking through bar completion shows actual vs. planned performance instantly
- Communication tool rather than computational method—complements CPM rather than replacing it
Project Scheduling
- Milestone identification establishes key decision points and phase transitions throughout project lifecycle
- Coordination mechanism ensures all disciplines understand dependencies and handoff requirements
- Baseline establishment creates the reference point against which all performance is measured
Compare: CPM vs. Gantt Charts—both represent schedules, but CPM calculates the mathematical relationships between tasks while Gantt charts visualize them for communication. If an FRQ asks about determining project duration, use CPM; if it asks about stakeholder communication, discuss Gantt charts.
Resource and Cost Optimization
These techniques answer: how do we deliver the project efficiently without overextending budgets or personnel? The core principle is that resources are finite, and optimal allocation requires balancing utilization against availability constraints.
Resource Allocation and Leveling
- Leveling smooths resource demand by shifting non-critical activities within their float to avoid peak-and-valley staffing
- Prevents overallocation where the same crew is assigned to multiple concurrent tasks
- May extend duration when leveling pushes activities beyond their early start dates—a key tradeoff to understand
Cost Estimation and Budgeting
- Bottom-up estimation aggregates individual work package costs for accuracy; top-down estimation uses historical data for speed
- Contingency reserves account for known unknowns; management reserves cover unknown unknowns
- Early warning system when estimates are tracked against actuals throughout project phases
Value Engineering
- Function analysis asks "what does this element do?" rather than "what is this element?"—enabling creative alternatives
- Cost-to-function ratio optimization maintains or improves performance while reducing expense
- Stakeholder collaboration ensures proposed changes don't sacrifice requirements that matter to end users
Compare: Cost Estimation vs. Value Engineering—estimation predicts what the design will cost, while value engineering asks whether a different design could deliver the same function for less. Both manage cost, but at different project phases.
These techniques provide the feedback loops that answer: are we on track, and if not, what corrective action is needed? The underlying principle is that you can't manage what you don't measure—and effective metrics integrate multiple performance dimensions.
Earned Value Management (EVM)
- Three key metrics: PV (planned value), EV (earned value), and AC (actual cost) enable integrated performance assessment
- Schedule Performance Index SPI=PVEV and Cost Performance Index CPI=ACEV quantify efficiency
- Forecast calculations like EAC=CPIBAC (Estimate at Completion) predict final cost based on current trends
Quality Control and Assurance
- QA is process-focused (preventing defects through system design); QC is product-focused (detecting defects through inspection)
- Specification compliance verified through testing, inspection, and documentation at defined hold points
- Cost of quality includes prevention costs, appraisal costs, and failure costs—investing in prevention reduces total quality cost
Compare: EVM vs. Traditional Cost Tracking—traditional methods compare budget to spending, but EVM adds the critical question: "what did we get for what we spent?" This makes EVM essential for identifying projects that are on budget but behind schedule.
Risk and Change Management
These techniques address uncertainty: what could go wrong, and how do we respond when plans change? The principle is that construction projects operate in dynamic environments—success requires anticipating problems and adapting systematically.
Risk Management
- Risk identification uses techniques like brainstorming, checklists, and historical analysis to catalog potential threats
- Risk response strategies: avoid, mitigate, transfer, or accept—each appropriate for different risk profiles
- Risk register documents identified risks, probability, impact, response plans, and owners for ongoing monitoring
Change Management
- Change control board evaluates proposed changes against scope, schedule, and cost impacts before approval
- Configuration management ensures all stakeholders work from current, approved documents and specifications
- Scope creep prevention requires formal processes—undocumented changes are the leading cause of project overruns
Safety Management
- Hazard identification proactively catalogs site-specific risks before work begins
- Hierarchy of controls: eliminate, substitute, engineer, administrate, PPE—in order of effectiveness
- Leading indicators (near-misses, safety observations) predict performance better than lagging indicators (injury rates)
Compare: Risk Management vs. Change Management—risk management anticipates potential problems before they occur; change management handles actual deviations once they're identified. Both require documentation, assessment, and formal approval processes.
Collaboration and Integration
These techniques optimize how people and information flow across project teams: how do we ensure everyone has what they need to do their work effectively? The principle is that construction projects involve multiple organizations with different incentives—coordination doesn't happen automatically.
- 3D parametric modeling embeds data (cost, schedule, specifications) within geometric representations
- Clash detection identifies conflicts between disciplines (structural vs. MEP) before construction, when changes are cheap
- Lifecycle integration extends value beyond construction into operations, maintenance, and facility management
Lean Construction
- Last Planner System involves frontline supervisors in weekly planning to improve commitment reliability
- Pull scheduling sequences work based on downstream needs rather than pushing activities forward
- Waste identification targets the eight wastes: defects, overproduction, waiting, transportation, inventory, motion, overprocessing, underutilized talent
Stakeholder Management
- Stakeholder analysis maps influence vs. interest to prioritize engagement strategies
- Communication planning tailors message content, frequency, and channel to each stakeholder group
- Expectation alignment prevents disputes by documenting agreements and managing scope boundaries
Procurement Management
- Delivery method selection (design-bid-build, design-build, CM at-risk) allocates risk and responsibility differently
- Contract types range from lump sum (owner transfers risk) to cost-plus (owner retains risk)
- Supply chain coordination ensures material availability aligns with construction sequence
Compare: BIM vs. Lean Construction—BIM optimizes information flow through digital integration; Lean optimizes work flow through process improvement. Both reduce waste, but through different mechanisms. Strong projects use both.
Quick Reference Table
|
| Schedule optimization | CPM, Gantt Charts, Project Scheduling |
| Resource efficiency | Resource Allocation/Leveling, Lean Construction |
| Cost management | Cost Estimation, Value Engineering, EVM |
| Performance measurement | EVM, Quality Control/Assurance |
| Uncertainty management | Risk Management, Change Management |
| Digital integration | BIM |
| Stakeholder coordination | Stakeholder Management, Procurement Management |
| Site operations | Safety Management, Lean Construction |
Self-Check Questions
-
Which two techniques both address project scheduling but serve fundamentally different purposes—one computational, one communicative?
-
If a project has SPI=0.85 and CPI=1.10, what does this tell you about project performance, and which technique generated these metrics?
-
Compare and contrast QA vs. QC: at what project phase is each most relevant, and which focuses on prevention vs. detection?
-
A project manager needs to reduce peak workforce demand without adding cost. Which technique should they apply, and what tradeoff might result?
-
An FRQ asks you to recommend techniques for a complex hospital project with multiple design firms and a tight schedule. Which three techniques from this guide would you prioritize, and why do they work together?