upgrade
upgrade

🎖️Civil War and Reconstruction

Important Civil War Generals

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

The Civil War wasn't won or lost by armies alone—it was shaped by the strategic visions, tactical decisions, and leadership styles of individual commanders. When you study these generals, you're really studying military strategy, total war doctrine, the relationship between civilian and military leadership, and how individual decisions alter historical outcomes. The AP exam expects you to understand how different approaches to warfare—offensive vs. defensive, attrition vs. maneuver, limited war vs. total war—affected not just battles but the entire trajectory of the conflict and Reconstruction.

These generals also illuminate broader themes you'll be tested on: the tension between military necessity and political goals, the evolution of modern warfare, and how wartime leadership translated into postwar influence. Don't just memorize names and battles—know what strategic philosophy each general represents and how their decisions connected to larger questions about Union preservation, Confederate independence, and the meaning of victory itself.


Architects of Total War

Total war strategy targeted not just enemy armies but the economic infrastructure, resources, and civilian morale that sustained the Confederate war effort. These commanders understood that destroying the South's capacity to fight was as important as winning individual battles.

Ulysses S. Grant

  • Attrition warfare pioneer—recognized that the Union's superior manpower and resources meant victory through sustained pressure, even at high casualty costs
  • Vicksburg Campaign (1863) split the Confederacy by securing Union control of the Mississippi River, demonstrating his strategic vision beyond single battles
  • Accepted Lee's surrender at Appomattox (April 1865), offering generous terms that reflected Lincoln's reconciliation goals and set the tone for Reconstruction

William Tecumseh Sherman

  • "March to the Sea" (1864) destroyed Confederate infrastructure from Atlanta to Savannah, targeting railroads, factories, and supplies rather than enemy troops
  • Total war philosophy aimed to break Southern civilian morale and demonstrate the futility of continued resistance—controversial but strategically effective
  • Capture of Atlanta (September 1864) boosted Northern morale and helped secure Lincoln's reelection, showing how military success shaped political outcomes

Compare: Grant vs. Sherman—both embraced total war, but Grant focused on destroying Confederate armies through attrition while Sherman targeted Southern infrastructure and morale. If an FRQ asks about Union strategy evolution, contrast their complementary approaches.


Confederate Tactical Brilliance

Confederate generals often compensated for inferior resources with superior tactical skill and aggressive maneuvering. Their early successes prolonged the war but couldn't overcome the Union's material advantages.

Robert E. Lee

  • Army of Northern Virginia commander achieved stunning tactical victories at Fredericksburg and Chancellorsville despite being outnumbered
  • Offensive-defensive strategy sought to win through decisive battles that would break Northern will, but costly gambles like Gettysburg depleted irreplaceable Confederate manpower
  • Surrender at Appomattox symbolized Confederate defeat and later made Lee a contested symbol of the "Lost Cause" narrative

Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson

  • Earned nickname at First Bull Run (1861) for holding his position "like a stone wall," becoming a symbol of Confederate resolve
  • Valley Campaign (1862) used rapid movement and deception to tie down multiple Union armies with a smaller force—a masterclass in maneuver warfare
  • Death from friendly fire at Chancellorsville (1863) deprived Lee of his most aggressive subordinate at a critical moment, weakening Confederate command

James Longstreet

  • Lee's "Old War Horse" commanded the First Corps and excelled at defensive tactics, particularly at Fredericksburg
  • Advocated defensive strategy at Gettysburg, opposing Pickett's Charge—his postwar criticism of Lee made him controversial among Lost Cause adherents
  • Supported Reconstruction as a Republican after the war, demonstrating how some Confederate leaders adapted to new political realities

Compare: Lee vs. Longstreet—both were skilled tacticians, but Lee favored aggressive offensive action while Longstreet preferred defensive positions and counterattacks. Their disagreement at Gettysburg illustrates the strategic debates that shaped Confederate defeat.


Union Command Struggles

The Union's early war leadership was plagued by cautious generals who failed to exploit Northern advantages. These commanders illustrate the challenges of translating organizational skill into battlefield success.

George B. McClellan

  • Organizational genius who transformed the Army of the Potomac into a professional fighting force but proved too cautious to use it effectively
  • Peninsular Campaign (1862) failed to capture Richmond despite superior numbers, reflecting his chronic overestimation of Confederate strength
  • Ran against Lincoln in 1864 on a peace platform, demonstrating how military frustration fueled political opposition to the war

Ambrose Burnside

  • Fredericksburg disaster (December 1862) resulted from frontal assaults against entrenched Confederate positions, costing 12,000 Union casualties
  • Battle of the Crater (1864) exemplified poor tactical execution when a promising mine explosion became a Union catastrophe
  • Recognized his own limitations—reportedly declined command multiple times, highlighting the difficulty of finding competent Union leadership

George Meade

  • Victory at Gettysburg (July 1863) halted Lee's invasion of the North and marked a turning point in the war
  • Criticized for not pursuing Lee after Gettysburg, allowing the Confederate army to escape—Lincoln lamented the missed opportunity to end the war
  • Remained Army of the Potomac commander under Grant's overall direction, illustrating the Union's eventual command structure solution

Compare: McClellan vs. Grant—both commanded the Army of the Potomac, but McClellan's caution contrasted sharply with Grant's willingness to accept casualties for strategic gains. This comparison illustrates why Lincoln kept searching for aggressive commanders.


Cavalry and Unconventional Warfare

Cavalry operations evolved from reconnaissance to strategic raiding, with commanders on both sides developing tactics that would influence military thinking for decades.

Philip Sheridan

  • Shenandoah Valley Campaign (1864) destroyed Confederate resources in Virginia's breadbasket using "scorched earth" tactics
  • Aggressive cavalry operations helped seal Confederate defeat at Five Forks and Appomattox, cutting off Lee's escape routes
  • Key Reconstruction-era military leader who enforced federal authority in the South, connecting wartime service to postwar policy

Nathan Bedford Forrest

  • "Get there first with the most men" philosophy made him one of the war's most effective cavalry raiders despite no formal military training
  • Fort Pillow Massacre (1864) raised serious ethical questions about the treatment of Black Union soldiers under his command
  • First Grand Wizard of the Ku Klux Klan after the war, directly linking Confederate military leadership to violent Reconstruction-era resistance

Compare: Sheridan vs. Forrest—both were aggressive cavalry commanders who understood the strategic value of raids and resource destruction. However, their postwar trajectories diverged sharply: Sheridan enforced Reconstruction while Forrest led violent opposition to it.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Total War StrategyGrant, Sherman
Confederate Tactical ExcellenceLee, Jackson
Defensive vs. Offensive DebateLongstreet vs. Lee at Gettysburg
Union Command ProblemsMcClellan, Burnside
Turning Point VictoriesMeade (Gettysburg), Grant (Vicksburg)
Cavalry/Unconventional WarfareSheridan, Forrest
Military-to-Political TransitionGrant (President), McClellan (1864 candidate)
Reconstruction-Era Military RoleSherman, Sheridan, Longstreet

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two Union generals best exemplify total war strategy, and how did their approaches differ in targeting Confederate weaknesses?

  2. Compare Lee's and Longstreet's strategic philosophies—how did their disagreement at Gettysburg reflect broader debates about Confederate war strategy?

  3. Why did the Union struggle to find effective commanders early in the war? Use McClellan and Burnside as examples of the leadership challenges Lincoln faced.

  4. If an FRQ asked you to explain how military leadership connected to Reconstruction politics, which generals would you discuss and why?

  5. Compare Sheridan and Forrest as cavalry commanders—what did they share tactically, and how did their postwar actions reflect different responses to Confederate defeat?