Important Battles of the Peloponnesian War

Why This Matters

The Peloponnesian War (431-404 BCE) wasn't just a conflict between two city-states—it was a clash between two fundamentally different systems of power. Athens represented thalassocracy (rule through sea power), democratic governance, and imperial ambition. Sparta embodied land-based military dominance, oligarchic discipline, and defensive alliance networks. When you study these battles, you're being tested on how geography shapes military strategy, how imperial overreach leads to collapse, and how the balance of power shifts through decisive turning points.

Don't just memorize dates and outcomes. For each battle, know what type of warfare it represents (naval vs. land, siege vs. open engagement), what strategic principle it demonstrates (control of supply lines, alliance management, the dangers of hubris), and how it fits into the war's larger arc. The exam loves asking you to compare Athenian naval tactics with Spartan land superiority, or to trace how a single catastrophic decision—like the Sicilian Expedition—can doom an empire.

---

Prelude Conflicts: Sparking the War (433-432 BCE)

These early engagements weren't part of the war itself but created the conditions that made it inevitable. Escalation theory matters here—small conflicts between allies dragged the major powers into direct confrontation.

Battle of Sybota (433 BCE)

• Naval clash between Athens and Corinth—technically a Corinthian tactical victory, but Athens demonstrated it would defend allies against Spartan-aligned states
• Corcyra's alliance with Athens brought one of Greece's largest navies into the Athenian camp, threatening Corinthian interests
• Triggered the "ally problem"—Corinth pressured Sparta to act, showing how alliance obligations escalate regional disputes into major wars

Battle of Potidaea (432 BCE)

• Athenian siege of a Corinthian colony—lasted over two years and drained Athenian resources before the war even officially began
• Imperial control vs. colonial autonomy became the central issue, as Athens demanded Potidaea tear down its walls and expel Corinthian officials
• Corinthian volunteers fought alongside Potidaea, making this a proxy conflict that pushed Sparta toward war

---

Athenian Naval Dominance: The First Phase (429 BCE)

Athens entered the war with the most powerful navy in the Greek world. These early victories confirmed thalassocratic strategy—control the seas, protect trade routes, avoid major land battles where Sparta excelled.

Battle of Naupactus (429 BCE)

• Athenian admiral Phormio defeated a larger Spartan fleet using superior seamanship and tactical innovation in the Gulf of Corinth
• Demonstrated the diekplous maneuver—Athenian triremes broke through enemy lines and attacked from behind, a technique requiring exceptional crew coordination
• Strategic chokepoint control allowed Athens to threaten Peloponnesian coastal trade and communications

Battle of Chalcis (429 BCE)

• Athenian victory in Euboean waters secured the island that supplied Athens with grain and timber
• Reinforced naval supremacy during a year when plague devastated Athens, showing the fleet remained effective despite domestic crisis
• Maritime route protection kept Athenian supply lines intact while Spartan forces ravaged Attica on land

---

Siege Warfare and Its Costs (429-427 BCE)

Sieges revealed the war's brutal realities. Unlike naval battles decided in hours, sieges lasted years and tested resource endurance, civilian suffering, and alliance loyalty.

Siege of Plataea (429-427 BCE)

• Sparta besieged Athens's oldest ally for over two years, using circumvallation walls to starve the defenders
• Brutal conclusion—surviving Plataeans were executed after a show trial asking if they had "done any service to Sparta"
• Symbolic importance exceeded strategic value; Plataea had fought alongside Sparta against Persia at the famous 479 BCE battle, making its destruction a propaganda victory

Battle of Spartolus (429 BCE)

• Athenian defeat in Chalcidice (despite some sources calling it a victory) revealed vulnerabilities in northern operations
• Alliance fragmentation in Thrace showed Athens couldn't maintain control over distant subject states while fighting Sparta
• Overextension warning—foreshadowed the dangers of fighting on too many fronts simultaneously

---

Turning Points: Shifting Momentum (425-418 BCE)

These battles broke the early stalemate. Athens achieved shocking successes, then suffered defeats that exposed the limits of naval power when fighting on land.

Battle of Pylos and Sphacteria (425 BCE)

• Athenian forces trapped and captured 120 Spartan Spartiates on Sphacteria Island—an unprecedented humiliation for Sparta's warrior elite
• Cleon's aggressive strategy succeeded where cautious generals hesitated, temporarily shifting Athenian politics toward hawkish leadership
• Sparta sued for peace (rejected by Athens), demonstrating how capturing elite soldiers could be more valuable than killing them

Battle of Delium (424 BCE)

• Decisive Boeotian victory over Athens killed over 1,000 Athenians, including the general Hippocrates
• Exposed Athenian land warfare weaknesses—their hoplites couldn't match Theban heavy infantry tactics
• Socrates fought here and was praised for his courage during the retreat, a detail that humanizes the philosophical tradition

Battle of Amphipolis (422 BCE)

• Spartan general Brasidas defeated Athens but both he and the Athenian leader Cleon died in battle
• Loss of key hawks on both sides enabled the Peace of Nicias (421 BCE), a temporary truce
• Strategic location—Amphipolis controlled timber and silver resources Athens needed for its fleet

Battle of Mantinea (418 BCE)

• Largest land battle of the war saw Sparta defeat a coalition including Athens, Argos, and Mantinea
• Restored Spartan military prestige after the Sphacteria humiliation, proving their hoplites remained Greece's finest
• Alliance politics mattered as much as tactics—Sparta's victory kept wavering allies in line

---

The Sicilian Catastrophe (415-413 BCE)

The Sicilian Expedition represents imperial hubris in its purest form. Athens gambled its entire strategic position on conquering a distant island—and lost everything.

Sicilian Expedition (415-413 BCE)

• Largest Greek military expedition ever assembled—over 100 ships and 27,000 men sent to conquer Syracuse
• Alcibiades's recall and defection to Sparta crippled leadership; he revealed Athenian plans to the enemy
• Total destruction—Athens lost its fleet, its army, and an entire generation of military-age citizens

Battle of Syracuse (413 BCE)

• Final disaster of the Sicilian Expedition—Athenian fleet destroyed in Syracuse's harbor, survivors massacred or enslaved
• Gylippus's Spartan reinforcements transformed Syracuse's defense, showing how alliance support could reverse seemingly hopeless situations
• Quarry imprisonment—captured Athenians died in brutal conditions, a fate that shocked the Greek world

---

Attrition and Recovery (413-406 BCE)

After Sicily, Athens should have collapsed. Instead, it demonstrated remarkable resilience—rebuilding its fleet and winning major victories even as Sparta established a permanent base in Attica.

Decelea Campaign (413-404 BCE)

• Spartan permanent fortification in Attica (on Alcibiades's advice) disrupted Athenian agriculture year-round
• 20,000 enslaved workers escaped to Decelea, crippling Athenian silver mining at Laurium
• Economic strangulation forced Athens to spend reserves on imported grain while funding a rebuilt navy

Battle of Cyzicus (410 BCE)

• Stunning Athenian naval victory destroyed the entire Spartan fleet and killed its admiral Mindarus
• Alcibiades's return (now fighting for Athens again) restored aggressive naval strategy
• Sparta offered peace—Athens again refused, a decision that proved catastrophic

Battle of Arginusae (406 BCE)

• Last major Athenian victory—over 70 Spartan ships destroyed in the largest naval battle of the war
• Storm prevented rescue of Athenian sailors from sinking ships; surviving generals were executed for this failure
• Political self-destruction—Athens killed its best commanders over a tragedy beyond their control

---

The Final Blow (405 BCE)

One battle ended twenty-seven years of war. Aegospotami demonstrated that even overwhelming naval power means nothing if leadership fails at the critical moment.

Battle of Aegospotami (405 BCE)

• Spartan admiral Lysander destroyed the Athenian fleet while crews were foraging on shore—poor discipline, not inferior seamanship, caused the defeat
• Only 9 of 180 Athenian ships escaped; thousands of sailors were executed as prisoners
• Athens surrendered within months—walls torn down, fleet reduced to 12 ships, democracy temporarily replaced by oligarchy

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two battles best illustrate how alliance obligations dragged Sparta into war against Athens, and what role did Corinth play in both?

2. Compare Athenian performance at Naupactus (429 BCE) with their defeat at Delium (424 BCE). What does this contrast reveal about Athenian military strengths and weaknesses?

3. How did the capture of Spartan soldiers at Sphacteria (425 BCE) and the Spartan victory at Mantinea (418 BCE) each affect the balance of power and willingness to negotiate peace?

4. The Sicilian Expedition and the Decelea Campaign both began in 413 BCE. Explain how these simultaneous developments created a strategic crisis Athens couldn't survive.

5. FRQ-style: Athens won major naval victories at both Cyzicus (410 BCE) and Arginusae (406 BCE), yet lost the war at Aegospotami (405 BCE). Analyze how Athenian political decisions after these victories contributed to their ultimate defeat.