Important Art Manifestos

Why This Matters

Art manifestos aren't just historical documents—they're declarations of war against the status quo. When you study these texts, you're learning how artists theorized their own practice, articulated aesthetic philosophies, and positioned themselves against tradition. Exam questions will ask you to connect specific manifestos to their broader cultural contexts: war, industrialization, political upheaval, and shifts in consciousness. Understanding the ideological foundations of each movement helps you analyze artworks through the lens of artistic intention rather than just visual description.

Don't just memorize dates and names. Know what problem each manifesto was trying to solve, what it rejected, and what alternative vision it proposed. When an FRQ asks you to discuss how artists responded to modernity or challenged institutional definitions of art, these manifestos are your primary evidence. The movements overlap, contradict, and build on each other—your job is to trace those intellectual genealogies.

---

Rejecting the Past: Manifestos of Radical Break

These manifestos share a violent rejection of tradition, demanding that art sever ties with history to embrace something entirely new. The mechanism here is negation—defining what art should be by destroying what it was.

Futurist Manifesto (1909)

• Filippo Tommaso Marinetti published this in Le Figaro, making it the first avant-garde manifesto to reach a mass audience
• Speed, technology, and violence celebrated as aesthetic values—famously declared a roaring car more beautiful than the Winged Victory of Samothrace
• Destruction of museums and libraries advocated as necessary for cultural renewal, linking aesthetic revolution to political transformation

Dada Manifesto (1918)

• Tristan Tzara's text embraces anti-art as a response to the rationalism that produced World War I's devastation
• Chance operations and found objects elevated to artistic methods, rejecting skill and intention as bourgeois values
• Nonsense and absurdity used strategically to expose the meaninglessness of conventional culture and language

---

The Unconscious as Source: Psychologically-Driven Manifestos

These texts locate artistic truth not in the external world but in the depths of the mind. They draw on Freudian theory to argue that authentic expression bypasses conscious control.

Surrealist Manifesto (1924)

• André Breton defined Surrealism as "pure psychic automatism," seeking to express the unconscious mind without rational interference
• Automatic writing and dream imagery proposed as techniques to access deeper truths hidden beneath everyday consciousness
• Liberation from logic framed as both aesthetic and political—Breton later aligned Surrealism with revolutionary politics

Abstract Expressionist Manifesto (1943)

• Mark Rothko and Adolph Gottlieb's letter to the New York Times articulated the movement's commitment to emotional intensity over representation
• Spontaneous gesture and physical action emphasized—the canvas becomes a record of the artist's psychological state during creation
• Myth and tragedy invoked as universal subjects, connecting individual expression to collective human experience

---

Pure Form: Manifestos of Geometric Abstraction

These manifestos sought to purify art by reducing it to essential visual elements. The underlying principle is that abstraction can communicate universal truths more directly than representation.

Suprematist Manifesto (1915)

• Kazimir Malevich declared the supremacy of pure feeling over depiction, reducing art to basic geometric forms like the iconic black square
• Non-objective art positioned as spiritually superior to representational work, which remained trapped in material appearances
• Color and form treated as autonomous expressive elements capable of conveying transcendent experience

De Stijl Manifesto (1918)

• Theo van Doesburg and Piet Mondrian advocated for universal harmony through strict limitation to primary colors, black, white, and rectangular forms
• Abstraction as social vision—geometric purity in art would model and promote a new rational social order
• Cross-disciplinary influence extended these principles to architecture, furniture, and typography, seeking total aesthetic transformation

---

Art Serves Society: Functionalist Manifestos

These texts reject art-for-art's-sake, arguing that aesthetic practice must serve practical and social purposes. The mechanism is integration—dissolving boundaries between art, design, and everyday life.

Constructivist Manifesto (1920)

• Aleksandr Rodchenko and Varvara Stepanova rejected easel painting for socially useful production aligned with Soviet revolutionary goals
• Industrial materials and techniques embraced—art should be constructed like engineering, not expressed like emotion
• Artist as worker redefined the creator's role, emphasizing collaboration with industry to build a new communist society

Bauhaus Manifesto (1919)

• Walter Gropius called for reuniting art, craft, and technology in a total work (Gesamtkunstwerk) that would reshape modern life
• Functional design prioritized—objects should serve human needs while achieving aesthetic excellence
• Interdisciplinary education modeled at the Bauhaus school, training artists to work across painting, architecture, textiles, and industrial design

---

Dissolving Boundaries: Anti-Hierarchical Manifestos

These later manifestos challenge the distinction between art and everyday life, high culture and mass culture. They question institutional definitions of what counts as art and who gets to decide.

Pop Art Manifesto (1957)

• Richard Hamilton's list defined Pop as "popular, transient, expendable, low-cost, mass-produced"—embracing consumer culture as legitimate subject matter
• Mass media imagery appropriated through techniques like silkscreen, challenging notions of originality and authenticity
• Irony and repetition used to blur boundaries between advertising and fine art, critiquing and celebrating capitalism simultaneously

Fluxus Manifesto (1963)

• George Maciunas called for anti-art that would purge the world of bourgeois sickness, intellectualism, and professionalism
• Everyday actions and objects elevated to art status through performance and event scores—art becomes indistinguishable from life
• Anti-commercial stance rejected the art market entirely, favoring cheap multiples, mail art, and collaborative happenings

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two manifestos most directly responded to World War I, and how did their responses differ in tone and strategy?

2. Compare the Suprematist and De Stijl manifestos: what visual principles do they share, and what distinguishes their underlying philosophies?

3. If an FRQ asked you to discuss how artists redefined the relationship between art and everyday life, which three manifestos would provide your strongest evidence?

4. Both Constructivism and Bauhaus rejected traditional fine art—what social visions motivated each, and how did their political contexts differ?

5. Trace the concept of "automatic" or "spontaneous" creation from Surrealism to Abstract Expressionism: what continuities and departures can you identify?