Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
The Harlem Renaissance wasn't just a cultural moment—it was a radical reimagining of what American literature could be. When you encounter these writers on the exam, you're being tested on your understanding of how marginalized voices reshape literary traditions, how modernist experimentation intersects with cultural identity, and how literature functions as both artistic expression and political resistance. These writers didn't simply document Black life; they argued for its beauty, complexity, and centrality to the American experience.
Don't just memorize names and titles. Know what each writer contributed to the movement's larger project: Who championed folk traditions? Who experimented with form? Who interrogated the very concept of racial identity? The exam will ask you to connect individual works to broader themes of cultural authenticity, double consciousness, resistance, and self-determination. Understanding the conceptual categories below will help you tackle any comparison question or FRQ prompt that comes your way.
These figures didn't just write—they theorized, edited, and promoted the Renaissance itself. Their work established the intellectual framework that made the movement possible.
Compare: Alain Locke vs. Jessie Redmon Fauset—both shaped the Renaissance through editorial power, but Locke emphasized philosophical frameworks while Fauset focused on discovering and nurturing individual talents. If an FRQ asks about the movement's infrastructure, these are your go-to figures.
These writers drew on African American oral traditions, dialect, and folklore to create literature rooted in authentic cultural expression rather than European models.
Compare: Langston Hughes vs. Zora Neale Hurston—both championed folk traditions, but Hughes focused on urban, Northern, working-class life while Hurston drew from rural Southern communities. Both rejected the pressure to write "respectable" literature for white approval.
These poets worked within established European forms—sonnets, lyric poetry, classical meter—while infusing them with distinctly African American content and concerns.
Compare: Countee Cullen vs. Claude McKay—both wrote formal poetry, but Cullen sought acceptance within mainstream literary traditions while McKay used traditional forms as vessels for radical protest. This tension between accommodation and resistance runs throughout the Renaissance.
These writers pushed against conventional literary forms, blending genres and fragmenting narrative to capture the complexity of African American identity.
Compare: Jean Toomer vs. Nella Larsen—both experimented with modernist techniques to explore racial identity's instability. Toomer fragmented form itself; Larsen fragmented her characters' psyches. Both suggest that "race" is more constructed than essential.
These writers documented African American history and experience, connecting the Renaissance to longer narratives of struggle and survival.
Compare: Arna Bontemps vs. James Weldon Johnson—both connected the Renaissance to African American history, but Johnson focused on cultural traditions (spirituals, sermons) while Bontemps emphasized political resistance and rebellion. Both remind us the Renaissance didn't emerge from nowhere.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Movement architects/editors | Alain Locke, Jessie Redmon Fauset, James Weldon Johnson |
| Folk tradition/vernacular | Langston Hughes, Zora Neale Hurston |
| Formal/traditional poetry | Countee Cullen, Claude McKay |
| Modernist experimentation | Jean Toomer, Nella Larsen |
| Racial identity/"passing" | Nella Larsen, James Weldon Johnson, Jean Toomer |
| Black feminist themes | Zora Neale Hurston, Nella Larsen, Jessie Redmon Fauset |
| Protest and resistance | Claude McKay, Langston Hughes |
| Historical consciousness | Arna Bontemps, James Weldon Johnson |
Which two writers championed folk traditions and vernacular language, and how did their regional focuses differ?
Compare Countee Cullen's and Langston Hughes's positions on whether Black poetry should use traditional European forms or distinctly African American vernacular. What was at stake in this debate?
Both Nella Larsen and James Weldon Johnson wrote about "passing." How do their treatments of this theme differ in focus or genre?
If an FRQ asked you to discuss how the Harlem Renaissance was organized and promoted, which three figures would you discuss and why?
Jean Toomer and Nella Larsen are both considered modernist experimenters. What formal or thematic innovations does each bring to their exploration of racial identity?