Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Adjective endings are the grammatical glue that holds German sentences together—and they're one of the most frequently tested grammar concepts on the AP German exam. Whether you're describing die schöne Landschaft in a cultural comparison essay, crafting a persuasive argument about erneuerbare Energien, or responding to an audio prompt about deutsche Familienrollen, your ability to correctly decline adjectives signals true command of the language. The exam rewards students who can seamlessly integrate adjectives into complex sentences across all four cases.
Here's what you're really being tested on: the relationship between articles, adjectives, and nouns. German adjectives don't just describe—they carry grammatical information about gender, case, and number. The key principle? Someone has to show the case. If the article already signals the gender and case clearly, the adjective relaxes into a simple -e or -en ending. If there's no article—or an article that doesn't fully signal the case—the adjective picks up the slack with a strong ending. Don't just memorize charts; understand why endings change based on what information is already present in the sentence.
German adjective endings follow one elegant rule: grammatical information must appear somewhere before the noun. When you understand this principle, the three declension patterns—strong, weak, and mixed—become logical rather than arbitrary.
Compare: der alte Mann vs. ein alter Mann—both nominative masculine, but the adjective ending differs because der clearly signals masculine while ein does not. On the FRQ, mixing these up is a common error that costs points.
Each grammatical case triggers specific ending patterns. Understanding the function of each case helps you predict endings in real-time during the exam.
Compare: Dative mit dem kleinen Kind vs. Genitive des kleinen Kindes—both use -en on the adjective, but the article and noun ending differ. Listen for prepositions: mit always triggers dative; wegen triggers genitive.
These patterns appear constantly in AP German reading passages, audio clips, and writing prompts. Recognizing them quickly frees up mental energy for comprehension and composition.
Compare: das schöne Wetter (weak, after definite article) vs. schönes Wetter (strong, no article)—same noun, different adjective endings. The AP loves testing this distinction in fill-in-the-blank formats.
| Concept | Key Pattern | Best Examples |
|---|---|---|
| Strong endings (no article) | Adjective mirrors der/die/das endings | kalter Kaffee, frische Milch, gutes Brot |
| Weak endings (after der-words) | -e (nom. sing.) or -en (everywhere else) | der alte Mann, die junge Frau, den neuen Film |
| Mixed endings (after ein-words) | Strong in nom. masc. & nom./acc. neut.; weak elsewhere | ein alter Freund, eine junge Frau, ein kleines Kind |
| Nominative case | Subject of sentence | Der deutsche Film ist interessant. |
| Accusative case | Direct object; masc. changes | Ich sehe den deutschen Film. |
| Dative case | Indirect object; -en dominates | mit dem deutschen Studenten |
| Genitive case | Possession; -en throughout | des deutschen Volkes |
| Plural patterns | No gender distinction; case still matters | die alten Häuser, alte Häuser |
Why does ein alter Mann use -er while der alte Mann uses -e, even though both are nominative masculine?
Which three positions in the mixed declension require strong adjective endings, and what do they have in common?
Compare mit kaltem Wasser and mit dem kalten Wasser—explain why the adjective endings differ despite both being dative neuter.
If an FRQ asks you to describe deutsche Familienrollen without using articles, what adjective ending pattern would you use, and why?
You're writing about die Energiewende and want to add the adjective wichtig. What ending do you use in the nominative, accusative, and dative cases, and how do you know?