Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Tensor operations aren't just abstract mathematical machineryโthey're the language that lets you express physical laws in a form that works in any coordinate system. When you're studying general relativity, continuum mechanics, or even modern machine learning, you're being tested on whether you understand how tensors combine, contract, and transform. The operations covered hereโaddition, multiplication, contraction, differentiation, and decompositionโshow up repeatedly in derivations and problem sets because they're the fundamental building blocks for everything else.
Don't just memorize what each operation does; know why you'd choose one over another. Can you explain when contraction is more useful than an outer product? Do you understand why transformation rules matter for physical consistency? These conceptual connections are what separate students who can solve problems from those who just recognize formulas. Master the underlying logic, and the calculations become straightforward.
These operations let you construct new tensors from existing ones. The key principle is that combining tensors of compatible types produces predictable resultsโthe output type depends entirely on the input types and how you combine them.
Compare: Addition vs. Outer Productโboth combine tensors, but addition requires matching types and preserves order, while outer products work on any tensors and increase order. If a problem asks you to construct a higher-rank tensor from vectors, reach for the outer product.
Contraction is how you extract meaningful quantities from tensors by summing over paired indices. This is the generalization of the dot product to arbitrary tensor ranksโit's how physics "collapses" tensor information into scalars or lower-rank objects.
Compare: Contraction vs. Inner Productโcontraction is the general mechanism (can be partial), while the inner product is the special case of complete contraction yielding a scalar. On exams, identify whether you need a scalar output or just a reduced-rank tensor.
These operations reorganize tensor components to reveal or impose symmetry properties. Understanding symmetry is critical because many physical tensors have built-in symmetry constraints that simplify calculations dramatically.
Compare: Symmetrization vs. Antisymmetrizationโboth decompose tensors into parts with definite exchange behavior. Any tensor can be written as the sum of its symmetric and antisymmetric parts. FRQs often ask you to identify which part carries physical meaning in a given context.
When tensors vary across space or time, you need tensor calculus to describe rates of change and accumulated quantities. The challenge is ensuring derivatives and integrals remain tensors themselves.
Compare: Differentiation vs. Integrationโdifferentiation increases tensor rank and probes local behavior, while integration reduces information to global quantities. Both require careful attention to transformation properties to maintain tensorial character.
The defining property of tensors is how they transform under coordinate changes. This isn't just a technicalityโit's what makes tensor equations valid physics in any reference frame.
Tensor decomposition breaks complex tensors into simpler pieces, revealing structure and enabling efficient computation. This is where pure mathematics meets practical data science.
Compare: CP vs. Tucker DecompositionโCP is more constrained (diagonal core), making it unique under mild conditions but harder to compute. Tucker is more flexible but less interpretable. Choose based on whether you need uniqueness or expressiveness.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Building higher-rank tensors | Outer product, tensor addition |
| Reducing tensor rank | Contraction, inner product |
| Symmetry properties | Transpose, symmetrization, antisymmetrization |
| Calculus operations | Covariant differentiation, tensor integration |
| Coordinate behavior | Transformation rules (Jacobian) |
| Structural analysis | CP decomposition, Tucker decomposition |
| Scalar extraction | Full contraction, inner product |
Which two operations both reduce tensor rank, and what distinguishes their outputs?
If you need to construct a rank-4 tensor from two vectors and a matrix, which operation(s) would you use, and what would the resulting index structure be?
Compare and contrast symmetrization and antisymmetrization: how does each operation behave under index exchange, and give one physical example where each is relevant.
Why does tensor differentiation in curved spaces require the covariant derivative rather than ordinary partial derivatives? What goes wrong if you use partial derivatives?
An FRQ asks you to show that a physical law is coordinate-independent. Which tensor operation's transformation rules would you invoke, and what mathematical object appears in those rules?