upgrade
upgrade

๐Ÿƒ๐Ÿฝโ€โ™€๏ธGalois Theory

Fundamental Isomorphism Theorems

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

The isomorphism theorems are the structural backbone of group theoryโ€”and by extension, everything you'll do in Galois Theory. When you're analyzing field extensions, you're constantly asking questions like "how does this quotient group relate to that subgroup?" or "what happens when I mod out by a normal subgroup?" These theorems give you the precise machinery to answer those questions. They transform messy, complicated group structures into clean isomorphisms you can actually work with.

You're being tested on your ability to apply these theorems, not just state them. That means recognizing when a problem is secretly asking you to use the First Isomorphism Theorem to identify a quotient, or when the Lattice Theorem explains why subgroups of a Galois group correspond to intermediate fields. Don't just memorize the formulasโ€”know what structural insight each theorem provides and when to reach for it.


Theorems That Build Quotients from Homomorphisms

The First Isomorphism Theorem is your workhorse. Whenever you have a homomorphism, you automatically get an isomorphismโ€”the kernel tells you exactly what you're "collapsing" to create the quotient.

First Isomorphism Theorem

  • Core statementโ€”if f:Gโ†’Hf: G \to H is a homomorphism, then G/kerโก(f)โ‰…Im(f)G/\ker(f) \cong \text{Im}(f)
  • The kernel determines everything: the kernel kerโก(f)\ker(f) is always normal in GG, and the "size" of the quotient equals the "size" of the image
  • Galois application: when you restrict automorphisms to a subfield, this theorem identifies the resulting quotient group with the automorphism group of the smaller extension

Theorems That Relate Subgroups to Quotients

These theorems answer a natural question: if you have subgroups interacting inside a group, how do those relationships survive when you pass to quotients? The key insight is that normal subgroups act as "compatible" denominators.

Second Isomorphism Theorem

  • Core statementโ€”if Hโ‰คGH \leq G and NโŠดGN \trianglelefteq G, then HN/Nโ‰…H/(HโˆฉN)HN/N \cong H/(H \cap N)
  • The "diamond" or "parallelogram" theorem: visualize HH and NN as two subgroups whose product HNHN sits above them, with HโˆฉNH \cap N below
  • Why it matters: lets you compute quotients of products without knowing HNHN explicitlyโ€”you only need HH and the intersection

Third Isomorphism Theorem

  • Core statementโ€”if KโІNK \subseteq N are both normal in GG, then (G/K)/(N/K)โ‰…G/N(G/K)/(N/K) \cong G/N
  • "Cancellation" for quotients: modding out by KK first, then by N/KN/K, gives the same result as modding out by NN directly
  • Hierarchical structure: this theorem is essential when you're working with towers of field extensions and need to relate successive quotients

Compare: Second vs. Third Isomorphism Theoremโ€”both relate subgroups to quotients, but the Second handles a subgroup meeting a normal subgroup (horizontal interaction), while the Third handles nested normal subgroups (vertical hierarchy). FRQs often test whether you can identify which theorem applies to a given subgroup configuration.


Theorems That Preserve Lattice Structure

The Lattice Isomorphism Theorem (sometimes called the Fourth Isomorphism Theorem or Correspondence Theorem) reveals that passing to a quotient doesn't destroy subgroup structureโ€”it preserves it in a precise, one-to-one way.

Fourth Isomorphism Theorem (Lattice Isomorphism Theorem)

  • Core statementโ€”there's a bijection between subgroups of GG containing NN and subgroups of G/NG/N, given by Hโ†ฆH/NH \mapsto H/N
  • Lattice preservation: this bijection respects containment, intersections, and productsโ€”the "shape" of the subgroup lattice above NN matches the lattice of G/NG/N
  • Galois connection: this is why intermediate fields of K/FK/F correspond to subgroups of Gal(K/F)\text{Gal}(K/F)โ€”the lattice structure transfers perfectly

Correspondence Theorem

  • Generalized frameworkโ€”extends the lattice correspondence to other algebraic structures (rings, modules) beyond groups
  • Substructure preservation: normal subgroups above NN correspond to normal subgroups of the quotient, maintaining the "normal" property through the bijection
  • Essential for Galois Theory: the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory is essentially this correspondence applied to automorphism groups and intermediate fields

Compare: Lattice Theorem vs. Correspondence Theoremโ€”these are often treated as the same result (the Correspondence Theorem is the Lattice Theorem stated more generally). The key exam distinction: Lattice emphasizes the bijection between subgroups, while Correspondence emphasizes that properties like normality are preserved. Know both phrasings.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Quotient from homomorphismFirst Isomorphism Theorem
Subgroup-normal subgroup interactionSecond Isomorphism Theorem
Nested normal subgroupsThird Isomorphism Theorem
Subgroup lattice preservationFourth (Lattice) Isomorphism Theorem
Property preservation under quotientsCorrespondence Theorem
Computing unknown quotientsFirst, Second Isomorphism Theorems
Tower of extensionsThird Isomorphism Theorem, Correspondence
Galois correspondenceLattice/Correspondence Theorem

Self-Check Questions

  1. If you have a surjective homomorphism f:Gโ†’Hf: G \to H, which theorem immediately tells you that G/kerโก(f)โ‰…HG/\ker(f) \cong H? What must you verify about kerโก(f)\ker(f)?

  2. Compare the Second and Third Isomorphism Theorems: both produce isomorphisms involving quotients, but what's the key structural difference in their hypotheses?

  3. You're given KโŠดNโŠดGK \trianglelefteq N \trianglelefteq G. Write the isomorphism that the Third Isomorphism Theorem guarantees, and explain why this is useful for analyzing a tower of field extensions.

  4. The Lattice Isomorphism Theorem says subgroups of G/NG/N correspond to subgroups of GG containing NN. If GG has exactly 5 subgroups containing NN, how many subgroups does G/NG/N have? What property do normal subgroups of GG (containing NN) correspond to in G/NG/N?

  5. (FRQ-style) Let f:Gโ†’Hf: G \to H be a homomorphism with kerโก(f)=N\ker(f) = N. Suppose KK is a subgroup of GG containing NN. Using the isomorphism theorems, describe f(K)f(K) in terms of a quotient of KK, and explain which theorem(s) you're applying.