Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Every dynamics problem you'll encounter—whether it's a spacecraft docking maneuver, a car crash analysis, or a spinning turbine—reduces to one of these fundamental equations. You're being tested on your ability to recognize which equation applies to which scenario and why that equation captures the physics at play. The concepts here—force-acceleration relationships, energy methods, momentum principles, and rigid body motion—form the analytical toolkit you'll use throughout your engineering career.
These equations aren't isolated formulas to memorize; they're interconnected principles that describe how objects move and interact. Newton's Second Law underlies everything, but knowing when to use an energy approach versus a momentum approach is what separates students who struggle from those who solve problems efficiently. Don't just memorize the math—understand what physical quantity each equation conserves or relates, and you'll know exactly which tool to reach for on exam day.
These equations directly connect forces to the resulting motion. When you know the forces acting on a system and need to find accelerations (or vice versa), this is your starting point.
Compare: Newton's Second Law vs. Kinematic Equations—both describe particle motion, but Newton's Law relates forces to acceleration while kinematics relates motion variables to each other. Use Newton's Law first to find , then kinematics to find position and velocity.
Energy approaches are powerful when forces vary along a path or when you care about speeds rather than accelerations. These methods use scalar quantities, eliminating the need for vector components.
Compare: Work-Energy Principle vs. Conservation of Energy—both involve energy, but Work-Energy includes all forces (conservative and non-conservative) while Conservation of Energy only applies when non-conservative work is zero. If friction is present, use Work-Energy with .
Momentum methods shine when forces are unknown or impulsive, especially in collisions. These approaches track how motion transfers between objects rather than analyzing forces directly.
Compare: Impulse-Momentum vs. Conservation of Momentum—Impulse-Momentum applies to a single body experiencing external impulse, while Conservation applies to a system of bodies with no net external impulse. For collisions, use Conservation for the system, then Impulse-Momentum if you need the force on one object.
Rotational motion requires its own set of equations that parallel the linear case. Moment of inertia replaces mass, angular velocity replaces linear velocity, and torque replaces force.
Compare: Conservation of Linear vs. Angular Momentum—both are conserved in isolated systems, but linear momentum requires no external forces while angular momentum requires no external torques. A system can conserve one without conserving the other depending on what external interactions exist.
Real engineering systems involve extended bodies that can translate and rotate simultaneously. These equations couple linear and angular motion for complete analysis.
Compare: Newton-Euler Equations vs. Virtual Work—Newton-Euler requires free-body diagrams and explicitly solving for constraint forces, while Virtual Work bypasses constraints entirely. Use Virtual Work when you have many interconnected bodies with complex constraints; use Newton-Euler when you need the constraint forces themselves.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Force-acceleration analysis | Newton's Second Law, Particle Equations of Motion |
| Speed/position from energy | Work-Energy Principle, Conservation of Energy |
| Collision and impact analysis | Impulse-Momentum Theorem, Conservation of Linear Momentum |
| Rotational dynamics | Angular Momentum Equation, Conservation of Angular Momentum |
| Combined translation and rotation | Rigid Body Equations of Motion |
| Constrained system analysis | Principle of Virtual Work |
| Variable force problems | Work-Energy Principle |
| Impulsive force problems | Impulse-Momentum Theorem |
A block slides down a rough incline. Which two equations would you combine to find its speed at the bottom, and why can't you use Conservation of Energy alone?
In a collision between two hockey pucks on frictionless ice, which quantity is definitely conserved? Under what additional condition would kinetic energy also be conserved?
Compare and contrast how you would analyze a swinging pendulum using (a) Newton's Second Law and (b) Conservation of Energy. Which approach finds tension in the string more easily?
A figure skater pulls her arms inward while spinning. Which conservation principle explains why her angular velocity increases, and what physical quantity remains constant?
FRQ-style prompt: A disk rolls without slipping down an incline. Explain why you need both and , and identify the kinematic constraint that links them.