Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you're mixing a track, EQ isn't just about making things "sound better"—it's about understanding why certain frequencies create specific perceptions in the listener's ear. You're being tested on your ability to identify frequency ranges by their sonic characteristics, troubleshoot common mixing problems like muddiness or harshness, and make intentional decisions about where instruments should live in the frequency spectrum. These concepts connect directly to psychoacoustics, signal flow, and the physics of sound that form the foundation of professional audio production.
The frequency ranges below aren't arbitrary—they're divided based on how human hearing perceives them and what role they play in a mix. Don't just memorize the numbers; know what each range contributes sonically, what problems occur when it's mishandled, and which instruments naturally occupy that space. This conceptual understanding is what separates technical operators from skilled producers.
Low frequencies provide the physical weight and power of a mix. These ranges are often felt as much as heard, and they're where most mixing problems begin—too much energy here creates mud, too little leaves a track feeling thin and weak.
Compare: Sub-bass vs. Bass—both provide low-end weight, but sub-bass is felt physically while bass is heard melodically. On an exam asking about frequency masking, bass (60-250 Hz) is where most instrument conflicts occur.
This range is notorious among engineers for causing issues. It adds essential warmth and body, but it's also where mud accumulates when multiple instruments stack their lower harmonics.
Compare: Bass vs. Low-Mids—bass provides fundamental pitch information, while low-mids add harmonic warmth. If a mix sounds muddy but the bass is clear, your problem is likely in the 250-500 Hz range.
This is where human hearing is most sensitive, which makes it crucial for intelligibility but also prone to causing listener fatigue when overemphasized. The ear naturally focuses here, so balance is everything.
Compare: High-Mids (2-4 kHz) vs. Presence (4-6 kHz)—both add clarity, but high-mids provide attack and punch while presence adds detail and articulation. For FRQs about listener fatigue, focus on the 2-4 kHz range.
High frequencies add the finishing touches—air, shimmer, and the sense of space that makes a mix feel "open." These ranges contain relatively little musical information but dramatically affect perceived quality.
Compare: Brilliance vs. Air—brilliance contains actual harmonic content from instruments, while air is primarily about spatial perception. When adding "shine" to a vocal, brilliance (6-10 kHz) affects tone; air (10-20 kHz) affects space.
Understanding frequency ranges means nothing without understanding how humans actually hear. These concepts explain why mixing isn't just about measurements—it's about perception.
Compare: Fundamental frequencies vs. Fletcher-Munson curves—fundamentals tell you where instruments live in the spectrum, while Fletcher-Munson explains how listeners perceive those frequencies at different volumes. Both are essential for mixes that translate across playback systems.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Physical impact (felt, not heard) | Sub-bass (20-60 Hz) |
| Rhythmic foundation | Bass (60-250 Hz) |
| Warmth and mud | Low-mids (250-500 Hz) |
| Vocal intelligibility | Mids (500-2000 Hz) |
| Attack and presence | High-mids (2-4 kHz), Presence (4-6 kHz) |
| Clarity and detail | Presence (4-6 kHz) |
| Sparkle and shimmer | Brilliance (6-20 kHz) |
| Space and openness | Air (10-20 kHz) |
| Frequency masking solutions | Fundamental frequencies knowledge |
| Volume-dependent perception | Fletcher-Munson curves |
Which two frequency ranges are most commonly responsible for "muddy" mixes, and what EQ technique addresses this problem?
Compare and contrast the high-mids (2-4 kHz) and presence (4-6 kHz) ranges—what does each contribute to a mix, and what problems arise from overemphasis in each?
If a vocal sounds "boxy" and lacks clarity, which frequency range would you cut, and which would you potentially boost? Explain your reasoning.
How do Fletcher-Munson curves explain why a mix that sounds balanced at high volume might seem bass-light when played quietly?
You're mixing a track where the kick drum and bass guitar are masking each other. Using your knowledge of fundamental frequencies, describe two EQ strategies to create separation between them.