Fundamental Audio Mastering Techniques

Why This Matters

Mastering is where your mix transforms from a solid recording into a release-ready track—it's the bridge between creative production and professional distribution. You're being tested on understanding not just what each tool does, but when and why to apply it. The techniques in this guide represent core concepts in signal flow, dynamics control, frequency management, and delivery standards that appear throughout Production II assessments.

Don't approach mastering as a checklist of random processes. Each technique serves a specific purpose in the mastering chain, and exam questions will ask you to identify which tool solves which problem. Master the underlying principles—gain structure, dynamic range, spectral balance, and format optimization—and you'll be able to answer any question they throw at you.

---

Signal Flow and Level Management

Before any processing begins, proper gain structure ensures your signal has room to breathe and your tools work optimally. These techniques establish the foundation everything else builds on.

Gain Staging

• Maintains optimal signal levels throughout the entire mastering chain—typically targeting $-18$ to $-12$ dBFS for plugins modeled on analog gear
• Prevents clipping and distortion by preserving headroom, giving your processors clean signal to work with
• Cumulative adjustments at each stage ensure clarity; one poorly set gain stage can compromise everything downstream

Mastering Chain Order

• Processing sequence directly impacts results—the same tools in different orders produce dramatically different sounds
• Standard flow typically runs: corrective EQ → compression → tonal EQ → stereo processing → limiting → dithering
• Each processor affects what comes next, so EQ cuts before compression mean the compressor responds differently than if you EQ after

Frequency Analysis

• Visual spectrum analyzers reveal frequency buildups and gaps your ears might miss, especially in problematic ranges like $200$–$400$ Hz
• Identifies masking issues where competing frequencies reduce clarity—critical for informed EQ decisions
• Correlation meters show phase relationships, helping you catch mono compatibility problems before release

---

Dynamics Control

Dynamics processing shapes how loud and quiet moments relate to each other. These tools compress, limit, and sculpt the energy of your track to achieve punch, consistency, and competitive loudness.

Compression

• Reduces dynamic range by attenuating signals above the threshold—ratio, attack, and release settings determine character
• Glues elements together for cohesion; mastering compression typically uses gentle ratios ($2:1$ to $4:1$) and slow attack times
• Adds sustain and presence when applied subtly, making the mix feel more powerful without obvious pumping

Limiting

• Brick-wall compression that prevents signal from exceeding a set ceiling—essential for hitting loudness targets without clipping
• Maximizes perceived loudness by catching peaks and allowing you to push overall level; the final stage before output
• Transparent limiting requires careful threshold and release settings to avoid audible distortion or "squashing"

Multiband Compression

• Splits signal into frequency bands (commonly $3$–$5$ bands) and compresses each independently
• Solves frequency-specific dynamics problems—tame a boomy low end without affecting vocal presence
• Requires careful crossover settings to avoid phase issues at band boundaries; overuse creates unnatural, hyper-controlled sound

De-essing

• Frequency-specific compression targeting sibilance, typically in the $4$–$10$ kHz range
• Prevents listener fatigue from harsh "s" and "t" sounds that become more prominent after limiting
• Can be broadband or split-band—split-band de-essers only compress the problematic frequency, preserving air and presence

---

Spectral Shaping

EQ and harmonic tools sculpt the tonal balance of your master, ensuring every frequency range sits correctly and the overall character matches your artistic vision.

Equalization (EQ)

• Boosts or cuts specific frequencies to correct tonal imbalances—mastering EQ moves are typically subtle ($1$–$3$ dB)
• Creates spectral space by carving out competing frequencies, improving clarity across the mix
• Linear-phase EQ avoids phase shifts that color the sound, though minimum-phase EQ can add desirable analog character

Harmonic Enhancement

• Adds overtones to enrich thin or sterile recordings—saturation, tape emulation, and exciter plugins generate harmonics
• Increases perceived loudness and warmth without raising actual peak levels
• Even harmonics ($2$nd, $4$th) sound musical and warm; odd harmonics ($3$rd, $5$th) add edge and presence

Noise Reduction

• Removes unwanted artifacts—hiss, hum, clicks, and background noise that become more audible after compression and limiting
• Spectral editing tools can surgically remove problems without affecting surrounding audio
• Over-processing creates artifacts—the goal is transparency, removing only what's necessary

---

Stereo Image and Space

These techniques control how your master occupies the stereo field, creating width, depth, and ensuring mono compatibility across playback systems.

Stereo Balance and Width

• Pan position and level relationships create the soundstage—mastering adjustments are subtle, correcting imbalances from mixing
• Width enhancement through stereo wideners or Haas effect can increase spaciousness but risks phase cancellation
• Mono compatibility must be checked—elements that disappear in mono indicate phase problems

Mid-Side Processing

• Separates center (mid) content from stereo (side) information, allowing independent processing of each
• Widen mixes by boosting side content or tighten low end by cutting bass from the sides
• Powerful but dangerous—excessive mid-side manipulation creates unnatural imaging and translation problems

---

Delivery and Format Optimization

The final stage ensures your master meets technical specifications for distribution platforms and maintains quality through format conversion.

Loudness Normalization

• LUFS (Loudness Units Full Scale) is the industry standard measurement—streaming platforms normalize to specific targets (Spotify: $-14$ LUFS)
• Integrated loudness measures the entire track; short-term and momentary readings show dynamic variation
• Over-limiting for loudness backfires on normalized platforms—your track gets turned down and sounds squashed

Dithering

• Adds shaped noise when reducing bit depth (e.g., $24$-bit to $16$-bit for CD) to mask quantization distortion
• Must be the absolute last process in the chain—any processing after dithering negates its benefit
• Different dither types (POW-r, MBIT+, etc.) have subtle sonic characteristics; choose based on program material

Reference Track Comparison

• A/B testing against professional releases reveals tonal and dynamic differences you might otherwise miss
• Level-match references to your master—louder always sounds "better," creating false comparisons
• Choose relevant references in similar genres; comparing a jazz trio master to EDM references won't help

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Compare and contrast compression and limiting—what parameters and use cases distinguish them, and where do they typically appear in the mastering chain?

2. Which two techniques both address frequency-specific problems but use fundamentally different approaches (one subtractive, one dynamics-based)?

3. If a streaming platform normalizes to $-14$ LUFS and your master measures $-8$ LUFS integrated, what happens to your track on playback, and why might this be problematic?

4. A client complains their master sounds great in headphones but the bass disappears on club systems. Which technique would you use to diagnose and potentially fix this, and why?

5. FRQ-style: Explain why dithering must be the final process in the mastering chain and describe what happens if you apply additional processing after dithering.