Fundamental 3D Printing Techniques

Why This Matters

In mechanical prototyping, choosing the right 3D printing technique isn't just about hitting "print"—it's about understanding which process delivers the material properties, surface finish, and geometric complexity your design demands. You're being tested on your ability to match printing methods to functional requirements, troubleshoot common failure modes, and optimize parameters like layer height and infill for specific applications. These decisions separate functional prototypes from expensive plastic paperweights.

Each technique in this guide operates on a distinct physical principle: thermal extrusion, photopolymerization, powder fusion, or binder deposition. Knowing the underlying mechanism helps you predict part behavior, anticipate post-processing needs, and justify your process selection in design reviews. Don't just memorize which printer uses which material—understand why each method produces different mechanical properties and what trade-offs you're accepting with each choice.

---

Thermal Extrusion Methods

These techniques build parts by heating material and depositing it through a nozzle. The key principle is thermoplastic flow—polymers soften when heated and solidify upon cooling, creating mechanical bonds between layers.

Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM)

• Thermoplastic filament extrusion—material is heated past its glass transition temperature and deposited layer by layer through a heated nozzle
• Material versatility includes PLA (low-temperature, biodegradable), ABS (impact-resistant, requires heated bed), and PETG (chemical-resistant, food-safe options)
• Layer adhesion strength depends on extrusion temperature, bed temperature, and print speed—poor settings cause delamination failures

---

Photopolymerization Methods

These processes use light energy to trigger chemical reactions in liquid resins. The mechanism is photoinitiated polymerization—UV or visible light activates photoinitiators that crosslink monomers into solid polymer networks.

Stereolithography (SLA)

• UV laser curing—a focused laser traces each layer's cross-section, polymerizing liquid resin with micron-level precision
• Surface finish quality far exceeds FDM due to the absence of discrete extrusion paths—ideal for visual prototypes and master patterns
• Post-curing requirement—printed parts remain partially polymerized and require UV exposure to achieve full mechanical properties

---

Powder Fusion Methods

These techniques use energy to selectively consolidate powder particles. The principle is sintering or melting—particles bond at contact points when heated near or above their melting temperature, creating fully dense or near-dense structures.

Selective Laser Sintering (SLS)

• Laser-fused powder bed—a high-power laser selectively sinters nylon or other polymer powders, with unsintered powder providing natural support
• No support structures needed—this enables complex internal channels, interlocking assemblies, and geometries impossible with other methods
• Functional part strength—sintered nylon approaches injection-molded properties, making SLS suitable for end-use components and functional testing

---

Jetting Methods

These processes deposit material through print heads similar to inkjet technology. The mechanism varies: material jetting deposits photopolymer droplets that are immediately cured, while binder jetting deposits adhesive onto powder layers.

Material Jetting

• Droplet deposition with immediate UV cure—photopolymer droplets are jetted and solidified in a single pass, enabling multi-material printing
• Multi-material capability—different materials can be deposited in the same layer, allowing rigid-flexible combinations and full-color parts
• Photopolymer limitations—jetted materials typically exhibit lower impact strength and UV degradation compared to engineering thermoplastics

Binder Jetting

• Liquid binder on powder bed—adhesive droplets selectively bond powder particles, which are later consolidated through sintering or infiltration
• Material range spans polymers, metals, ceramics, and sand—the only technique offering true multi-material-class flexibility
• Green part fragility—as-printed parts are porous and weak; post-processing (sintering, infiltration, or curing) is mandatory for structural applications

---

Critical Print Parameters

Understanding these settings determines whether your print succeeds or fails. The underlying principle is balancing resolution, speed, and mechanical integrity—every parameter adjustment involves trade-offs.

Layer Height and Resolution

• Layer height is the vertical thickness of each deposited layer—typical FDM ranges from 0.1mm (high detail) to 0.3mm (fast draft)
• Resolution trade-off—lower layer heights improve surface finish and fine feature reproduction but increase print time exponentially
• Nozzle diameter interaction—resolution is constrained by nozzle size; a 0.4mm nozzle cannot reliably produce 0.2mm wall features

Infill Patterns and Density

• Internal structure geometry—infill creates the lattice inside solid shells, with patterns like grid (simple, fast), honeycomb (efficient strength-to-weight), and gyroid (isotropic properties)
• Density percentage directly correlates with part weight and strength—20% infill suits visual prototypes; 60%+ suits functional parts under load
• Failure mode consideration—low infill parts fail through shell buckling; high infill parts fail through layer delamination under bending loads

---

Support and Post-Processing

These techniques address the limitations of layer-by-layer fabrication. The principle is managing geometric constraints and enhancing final properties—additive manufacturing rarely produces ready-to-use parts directly off the build plate.

Support Structures

• Overhang management—supports prevent drooping and collapse for features exceeding ~45° from vertical (the critical overhang angle for most FDM printers)
• Support types include breakaway (same material, manually removed), soluble (dissolves in water or solvent), and tree (minimizes contact points)
• Surface finish impact—support contact points leave witness marks requiring post-processing; strategic orientation minimizes supports on critical surfaces

Post-Processing Techniques

• Surface finishing methods—sanding removes layer lines, acetone vapor smoothing melts ABS surfaces, and primer/paint hides imperfections
• Mechanical property enhancement—SLA parts require UV post-curing for full strength; SLS parts may need infiltration with epoxy or cyanoacrylate
• Dimensional accuracy—post-processing can affect tolerances; plan for material removal when designing interference fits

---

Process Control Software

Slicing software bridges design intent and machine execution. The principle is translating geometry into toolpaths—the slicer interprets your model and generates the motion commands that determine print success.

Slicing Software Basics

• G-code generation—slicers convert STL/3MF files into machine instructions specifying coordinates, speeds, temperatures, and extrusion rates
• Parameter control includes layer height, infill density, support generation, print speed, and temperature profiles—all adjustable per-region in advanced slicers
• Print preview validation—layer-by-layer visualization reveals potential issues (unsupported overhangs, thin walls, travel moves) before committing material and time

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two printing methods both use powder beds but differ in how they consolidate material? What are the implications for post-processing requirements?

2. You need to prototype a snap-fit enclosure with internal channels for wire routing. Compare FDM and SLS for this application—which would you select and why?

3. A part printed with SLA feels rubbery and weak immediately after printing. What post-processing step was likely skipped, and what physical process does it complete?

4. How does the choice between honeycomb and gyroid infill patterns affect part performance under multi-directional loading? When would each be preferred?

5. Compare material jetting and binder jetting in terms of as-printed part strength and post-processing requirements. For a full-color architectural model that will be handled frequently, which process would you recommend?