Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Social stratification isn't just an abstract concept—it's the framework that explains why some people have more power, wealth, and opportunities than others. When you're tested on this material, you're being asked to demonstrate that you understand how societies create and maintain inequality through systems (like caste or slavery), categories (like class, race, or gender), and processes (like educational sorting or income distribution). These concepts connect directly to foundational sociological ideas about social structure, power, conflict theory, and social mobility.
Don't just memorize definitions here. For each form of stratification, know whether it's ascribed (assigned at birth) or achieved (earned through effort), whether mobility is possible, and how different forms intersect with one another. The most sophisticated exam answers recognize that stratification is multidimensional—a wealthy woman still faces gender stratification, and a highly educated person of color still navigates racial barriers. Keep asking yourself: What type of system is this? Who benefits? How does it reproduce itself?
These systems assign social position at birth with little to no opportunity for movement. The key mechanism is ascription—status is inherited rather than earned, and social boundaries are enforced through law, custom, or violence.
Compare: Caste vs. Estate systems—both are closed and ascribed at birth, but estate systems allowed some mobility (especially through the church), while caste boundaries are virtually impermeable. If an FRQ asks about "degrees of openness" in stratification systems, this contrast is your go-to example.
Open systems allow for social mobility based on individual achievement, though structural barriers persist. The key mechanism is achievement—status can theoretically be earned through education, occupation, or talent, though starting position still matters enormously.
Compare: Social class vs. Meritocracy—class describes actual stratification patterns, while meritocracy describes an ideology about how stratification should work. Conflict theorists argue meritocracy masks how class advantages get passed down. This distinction between reality and ideology is frequently tested.
These forms of stratification are based on social categories that intersect with—and often reinforce—class position. The key mechanism is how socially constructed categories become the basis for unequal treatment and resource distribution.
Compare: Race vs. Gender stratification—both are based on socially constructed categories and involve systemic inequality, but they operate through different mechanisms. Gender stratification often works through family and domestic spheres; racial stratification frequently operates through residential segregation and institutional discrimination. Strong FRQ answers discuss how these categories intersect.
These factors represent mechanisms through which stratification is created, maintained, or potentially disrupted. The key insight is that stratification isn't static—it's reproduced through ongoing social processes.
Compare: Meritocracy vs. Educational attainment—meritocracy claims education rewards talent, but sociological research shows educational success correlates strongly with parents' class position. This tension between ideology and evidence is central to understanding modern stratification.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Closed/Ascribed Systems | Slavery, Caste system, Estate system |
| Open/Achieved Systems | Social class, Meritocracy |
| Categorical Stratification | Race and ethnicity, Gender, Age |
| Mobility Mechanisms | Educational attainment, Income (achieved) |
| Ideological Justifications | Meritocracy, Religious legitimation of caste |
| Intersectionality | Race + Class, Gender + Age, Multiple categories |
| Structural Inequality | Income inequality, Systemic racism, Gender wage gap |
What do slavery, caste, and estate systems have in common, and what key feature distinguishes estate systems from the other two?
A student argues that America is a true meritocracy because anyone can succeed through hard work. Using the concept of educational attainment, explain why a sociologist might challenge this claim.
Compare and contrast race and gender as forms of stratification—what mechanisms do they share, and how do they operate differently?
If an FRQ asks you to explain why class position tends to persist across generations in supposedly "open" societies, which three concepts from this list would you use, and why?
How does the concept of intersectionality help explain why age stratification might affect an elderly Black woman differently than an elderly white man?