Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you're studying earthquake engineering, understanding fault types isn't just about memorizing names—it's about recognizing how tectonic stress translates into ground motion and what that means for structural design. The type of fault determines the direction of rupture, the characteristics of seismic waves produced, and ultimately the kinds of forces your buildings and infrastructure will need to withstand. You're being tested on your ability to connect plate boundary dynamics, stress orientation, and fault geometry to real engineering decisions.
Each fault type produces distinct ground motion patterns that engineers must anticipate. A strike-slip fault generates different shaking characteristics than a thrust fault, which means different design considerations for foundations, lateral force-resisting systems, and site selection. Don't just memorize that normal faults involve extension—know why extensional stress produces downward hanging wall movement and what that implies for structures built across or near the fault trace.
Dip-slip faults involve movement primarily along the fault's dip angle, meaning the blocks move up or down relative to each other. The direction of movement depends entirely on whether the crust is being pulled apart (extension) or pushed together (compression). Understanding dip-slip mechanics is foundational because it connects directly to regional stress regimes.
Compare: Reverse fault vs. Thrust fault—both involve compression and upward hanging wall movement, but thrust faults have shallower dip angles (<45°) and typically accommodate greater horizontal shortening. If an exam question asks about subduction zone megathrust earthquakes, thrust faults are your answer.
Strike-slip faults accommodate lateral motion where blocks slide horizontally past each other with minimal vertical displacement. The fault plane is typically near-vertical, and movement occurs along the strike direction. These faults are critical in earthquake engineering because they often run through populated areas and produce intense, localized shaking.
Compare: Strike-slip fault vs. Transform fault—all transform faults are strike-slip faults, but not all strike-slip faults are transform faults. Transform faults specifically connect offset plate boundaries and are integral to plate tectonic geometry. For exam purposes, remember that "transform" implies a plate boundary context.
Some faults don't fit neatly into pure dip-slip or strike-slip categories. When multiple stress directions act simultaneously, faults can exhibit combined vertical and horizontal movement. Engineers working in tectonically complex regions must account for these multi-directional ground motions.
Compare: Oblique-slip fault vs. pure dip-slip or strike-slip—oblique motion complicates seismic hazard analysis because ground motion isn't confined to a single direction. FRQ questions may ask you to explain why oblique-slip faults require more complex structural analysis than faults with simpler motion patterns.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Extensional stress / divergent boundaries | Normal fault |
| Compressional stress / convergent boundaries | Reverse fault, Thrust fault |
| Horizontal motion / transform boundaries | Strike-slip fault, Transform fault |
| Shallow fault angle (<45°) | Thrust fault |
| Combined motion directions | Oblique-slip fault |
| Largest magnitude potential | Thrust fault (subduction megathrust) |
| Vertical motion category | Dip-slip fault, Normal fault, Reverse fault |
| Urban seismic hazard (California) | Strike-slip fault, Transform fault |
Which two fault types both involve compressional stress, and what geometric feature distinguishes them from each other?
A site investigation reveals a fault with both significant vertical and horizontal displacement. What fault type is this, and why does it complicate seismic design compared to simpler fault types?
Compare and contrast normal faults and reverse faults in terms of stress regime, hanging wall motion, and typical tectonic setting.
An FRQ asks you to explain why subduction zones produce the world's largest earthquakes. Which fault type would you discuss, and what characteristics make it capable of storing enormous strain energy?
If you're designing a structure near the San Andreas Fault, what type of ground motion should you primarily design for, and which fault classification explains this motion pattern?