Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Understanding acting techniques isn't just about memorizing who developed what—it's about recognizing how actors build truthful performances and why different approaches work for different performers and productions. You're being tested on your ability to identify the core principles behind each technique: Does it prioritize internal emotional work or external physical choices? Does it ask actors to draw from personal experience or imagination? These distinctions matter when you're analyzing performances, preparing audition material, or explaining why a director might choose one approach over another.
These techniques also reveal the evolution of Western acting theory, from Stanislavski's foundational work in early 20th-century Russia to contemporary American innovations. Each method emerged as a response to what came before—sometimes building on earlier ideas, sometimes rejecting them entirely. Don't just memorize the names and dates; know what problem each technique was trying to solve and what tools it gives actors to create authentic, compelling work.
These techniques prioritize the actor's inner emotional life as the foundation for truthful performance. The core principle: if you feel it genuinely, the audience will believe it.
Compare: Strasberg vs. Uta Hagen—both build on Stanislavski's emotional memory work, but Strasberg emphasizes reliving past trauma while Hagen focuses on present-moment substitution. If asked which technique prioritizes the actor's current relationships over past experiences, Hagen is your answer.
These techniques argue that personal experience is too limiting—actors should develop their imaginative capacity to create rich inner lives without relying on emotional recall. The core principle: imagination is more reliable and sustainable than memory.
Compare: Stella Adler vs. Chekhov—both reject emotional memory in favor of imagination, but Adler emphasizes intellectual script analysis while Chekhov prioritizes physical and sensory imagination. Adler asks "what does the text tell me?" while Chekhov asks "what does my body know?"
These techniques shift focus away from preparation and toward spontaneous, in-the-moment response. The core principle: real acting happens between actors, not inside an individual performer's head.
Compare: Meisner vs. Practical Aesthetics—both emphasize present-moment responsiveness over emotional preparation, but Meisner builds this through improvisation and repetition while Practical Aesthetics uses rigorous script analysis. Meisner trains instinct; Practical Aesthetics trains clarity.
These techniques treat the body as the primary instrument of expression, arguing that physical choices generate emotional truth. The core principle: change the body, change the performance.
Compare: Viewpoints vs. Grotowski—both prioritize the body, but Viewpoints emphasizes spatial awareness and ensemble collaboration while Grotowski focuses on individual physical and psychological transformation. Viewpoints builds group vocabulary; Grotowski strips the individual actor down to essentials.
Understanding how American techniques evolved from—and diverged from—Stanislavski's original work is essential for exam questions about influence and development.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Emotional memory/personal experience | Stanislavski, Strasberg, Uta Hagen |
| Imagination over memory | Stella Adler, Chekhov |
| Present-moment responsiveness | Meisner, Practical Aesthetics |
| Physical/movement-based | Viewpoints, Grotowski |
| Script analysis emphasis | Stella Adler, Practical Aesthetics |
| Ensemble/collaborative focus | Viewpoints, Stella Adler |
| Psychological gesture/physical transformation | Chekhov, Grotowski |
| Relaxation and sense memory | Strasberg |
Which two techniques both reject emotional memory but differ in whether they emphasize intellectual analysis or physical imagination?
If a director asks you to "find a psychological gesture" for your character, which technique are they drawing from, and what would that process involve?
Compare and contrast Meisner and Practical Aesthetics: what do they share in their approach to present-moment work, and how do their training methods differ?
A scene study prompt asks you to explain why Strasberg and Uta Hagen are both considered "Method" teachers yet have fundamentally different approaches. What's the key distinction?
Which technique would be most appropriate for devising original ensemble work without a traditional script, and what specific tools does it provide?