Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Factoring is multiplication in reverse. Instead of expanding into , you're starting with and breaking it back into . It's one of the most tested skills in algebra because it connects directly to solving equations, simplifying rational expressions, and working with functions later on.
The key to factoring isn't just memorizing formulas. It's learning to recognize which technique fits the expression in front of you. That pattern recognition is what separates quick, confident solutions from frustrating dead-ends.
Before you try anything else, always check for factors shared by every term. This simplifies the expression and often reveals a hidden pattern underneath.
The GCF is the largest factor (number and/or variable) that divides evenly into every term of the polynomial. Always pull it out first.
For example, in , every term is divisible by :
To check your work, distribute the GCF back through the parentheses. You should get the original expression.
Grouping works best for four-term polynomials. If you see four terms, this should be your first instinct.
For example, with :
Compare: GCF vs. Grouping โ both extract common factors, but GCF applies to all terms at once while grouping works with subsets of terms. On an exam, always pull out the GCF first, then check if grouping helps with what remains.
These formulas let you factor instantly once you recognize the structure. Memorize the forms โ they show up constantly.
This only works for the subtraction of two perfect squares. Both terms must be perfect squares, so look for coefficients like 1, 4, 9, 16, 25 and even exponents on variables.
For example:
One common trap: (a sum of squares) cannot be factored over the real numbers. Don't try to force it.
Notice the sign pattern. The binomial factor uses the same sign as the original expression. The trinomial factor flips the sign on the term and keeps the last term always positive. The mnemonic SOAP captures this: Same, Opposite, Always Positive.
For example:
The trinomial factor or does not factor further over the reals.
The test: check whether the middle term equals exactly , where and are the square roots of the first and last terms.
For example: because matches the middle term.
Spotting this pattern is faster than using general trinomial methods, which saves real time on exams.
Compare: Difference of Squares vs. Difference of Cubes โ both involve subtraction, but squares give two binomial factors while cubes give one binomial and one unfactorable trinomial. If a problem asks you to factor completely, remember that the trinomial from a cube formula doesn't break down further.
When special patterns don't apply, use systematic methods to factor expressions of the form .
When , you need two numbers and that multiply to and add to . Then:
For example, to factor : you need two numbers that multiply to 12 and add to 7. That's 3 and 4, so .
Watch your signs carefully:
When , the AC method gives you a systematic approach:
For example, to factor :
You can also use trial and error with factor pairs of and , but the AC method is more reliable, especially under pressure.
Compare: Simple trinomials vs. AC Method โ when , you can factor directly in one step; when , you need the extra splitting step. Always check if the leading coefficient is 1 before choosing your approach.
When basic techniques don't immediately apply, these methods help you see hidden structure.
Some expressions look complicated but are actually quadratic in disguise. You can replace a complex piece with a single variable to reveal the pattern.
For example, looks tough, but let :
Any time you see a polynomial that looks quadratic but has higher-degree terms (like and , or and ), try substitution.
"Factor completely" means every factor should be either prime (unfactorable) or a monomial. To get there, apply techniques in this order:
That last step is easy to forget. After your first factorization, look at every factor again. For instance, factors as , but is itself a difference of squares: .
Compare: Substitution vs. Grouping โ both are "restructuring" techniques, but substitution simplifies the form of the expression while grouping reorganizes its terms. If you see a polynomial that looks quadratic but isn't, try substitution first.
| Expression Type | Technique to Use |
|---|---|
| Always do first | GCF extraction |
| Two-term binomials | Difference of squares, sum/difference of cubes |
| Three-term patterns | Perfect square trinomials |
| General trinomials | AC method or trial and error |
| Four-term polynomials | Factoring by grouping |
| Hidden quadratics | Substitution method |
| Complex expressions | Complete factorization (combine techniques) |
What is the first step you should always take before applying any other factoring technique?
How can you distinguish between a perfect square trinomial and a general trinomial that requires the AC method?
Compare the formulas for sum of cubes and difference of cubes. What stays the same, and what changes?
Given the expression , which techniques would you need to apply to factor it completely? (Hint: it requires more than one step.)
If you encounter , explain why you would use the AC method rather than looking for a special pattern.