upgrade
upgrade

🧺Foundations of Social Work Practice

Ethical Principles in Social Work

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

The NASW Code of Ethics isn't just a document you memorize for licensing exams—it's the operational framework that distinguishes professional social work from well-intentioned helping. You're being tested on your ability to apply these principles when they conflict with each other, when client wishes clash with professional judgment, and when systemic barriers make "doing the right thing" complicated. Understanding the underlying logic of each principle helps you navigate those gray areas.

These ethical principles demonstrate core concepts like client autonomy, professional boundaries, cultural humility, and systems-level advocacy. Exam questions rarely ask you to simply define a principle—they present scenarios where multiple principles compete for priority. Don't just memorize the six core values; know which principle takes precedence in specific situations and why the profession has organized ethics this way.


Core Values: The Foundation of Professional Identity

These six principles form the backbone of the NASW Code of Ethics and represent what makes social work distinct from other helping professions. They're not ranked hierarchically—context determines which takes priority in any given situation.

Service

  • Elevating others' needs above self-interest—this principle establishes that social work exists to address human needs, not to benefit practitioners
  • Pro bono work is explicitly encouraged as an expression of this value, distinguishing social work from purely market-driven professions
  • Community-level service matters as much as individual casework—this principle extends beyond one-on-one helping to systemic engagement

Social Justice

  • Challenging systemic oppression—social workers actively confront discrimination, poverty, and institutional barriers rather than simply helping individuals cope with them
  • Advocacy for marginalized populations is a professional obligation, not an optional add-on to clinical work
  • Structural change is the goal—this principle requires attention to policies, institutions, and power dynamics that perpetuate inequality

Dignity and Worth of the Person

  • Inherent value regardless of circumstances—clients deserve respect whether or not they're "compliant," "motivated," or making choices you agree with
  • Balancing individual rights with societal responsibility creates ethical tension you'll encounter repeatedly on exams
  • Unconditional positive regard in practice means separating the person from their behaviors or situations

Compare: Service vs. Social Justice—both focus on helping others, but service emphasizes direct assistance while social justice targets root causes. If an exam asks about advocacy versus direct practice, this distinction matters.


Professional Conduct: How You Show Up

These principles govern the practitioner's behavior and establish the standards that protect both clients and the profession's reputation. Violations here are the most common reasons for licensure complaints.

Integrity

  • Consistency between stated values and actual behavior—this means following through on commitments and being honest even when it's uncomfortable
  • Transparency about limitations requires acknowledging when you can't help or when conflicts of interest exist
  • Accountability extends to admitting mistakes, accepting supervision feedback, and taking responsibility for outcomes

Competence

  • Practicing within your scope—you must only provide services you're trained and qualified to deliver, regardless of client requests or agency pressure
  • Ongoing professional development is mandatory, not optional—the field evolves, and your knowledge must evolve with it
  • Recognizing impairment in yourself (burnout, personal crisis, substance issues) is part of competent practice—knowing when to step back protects clients

Compare: Integrity vs. Competence—integrity is about honesty and consistency, while competence is about capability and skill. A practitioner can be deeply honest but still incompetent, or highly skilled but lacking integrity. Exams often test whether you can identify which principle is violated in a scenario.


Client Rights: Protecting Autonomy and Privacy

These principles center the client's agency and establish boundaries around information sharing. They're often in tension with other values, which is exactly what makes them exam favorites.

Respect for Client Self-Determination

  • Clients direct their own lives—your role is to inform, support, and empower, not to make decisions for competent adults
  • Limitations exist when client actions pose serious, foreseeable harm to themselves or others—this is where ethical complexity lives
  • Empowerment over dependence means building client capacity rather than creating reliance on the social worker

Confidentiality and Privacy

  • Default position is protection—client information stays private unless specific exceptions apply
  • Informed consent for disclosure means clients understand what will be shared, with whom, and why before you share it
  • Legal and ethical exceptions include mandated reporting, duty to warn, court orders, and supervision needs—know these cold for exams

Compare: Self-Determination vs. Confidentiality—both protect client autonomy, but self-determination governs decisions about their lives while confidentiality governs information about their lives. An FRQ might ask you to analyze a scenario where respecting one principle requires limiting the other.


Cultural Responsiveness: Working Across Difference

This principle acknowledges that effective practice requires understanding how identity, culture, and social location shape both client experiences and practitioner blind spots. It's not a separate skill—it's embedded in every other principle.

Cultural Competence and Social Diversity

  • Self-awareness of bias comes first—you can't work effectively across difference if you're unaware of your own assumptions and privileges
  • Cultural humility over cultural expertise—the goal isn't to "know" every culture but to approach each client as the expert on their own experience
  • Intersectionality matters—clients hold multiple identities simultaneously, and systems affect them differently based on those intersecting identities

Ethical Reasoning: When Principles Collide

This isn't a standalone principle but rather the process for navigating conflicts between principles. Expect scenario-based questions that require you to work through this process.

Ethical Decision-Making Process

  • Systematic framework required—gut instinct isn't enough; you need a structured approach that can be explained and defended
  • Consultation is expected—ethical dilemmas rarely have obvious answers, and seeking supervision or peer input demonstrates competence, not weakness
  • Documentation of reasoning protects you and your client—record what you considered, who you consulted, and why you chose your course of action

Compare: Self-Determination vs. Duty to Protect—this is the classic ethical tension. When a client's autonomous choices create risk of serious harm, which principle wins? The answer depends on imminence, severity, and specificity of the threat. Master this comparison for licensing exams.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptKey Principles
Client autonomySelf-Determination, Dignity and Worth, Confidentiality
Professional standardsIntegrity, Competence
Social change focusSocial Justice, Service
Information protectionConfidentiality, Privacy
Relationship-centered practiceImportance of Human Relationships, Dignity and Worth
Working across differenceCultural Competence, Social Diversity
Navigating conflictsEthical Decision-Making Process
Harm prevention exceptionsDuty to Warn, Mandated Reporting

Self-Check Questions

  1. A client tells you they plan to stop taking medication against medical advice. Which two principles are in tension, and how would you balance them?

  2. Compare and contrast how the principles of Service and Social Justice would guide your response to a client facing eviction due to discriminatory housing policies.

  3. Your supervisor asks you to provide family therapy, but your training is only in individual counseling. Which principle applies, and what should you do?

  4. A client from a cultural background different from yours requests that family members be included in all sessions. How do Cultural Competence and Self-Determination work together here?

  5. You discover that a colleague has been practicing while impaired. Which principles guide your response, and what steps does the ethical decision-making process require?