Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
The NASW Code of Ethics isn't just a document you memorize for licensing exams—it's the operational framework that distinguishes professional social work from well-intentioned helping. You're being tested on your ability to apply these principles when they conflict with each other, when client wishes clash with professional judgment, and when systemic barriers make "doing the right thing" complicated. Understanding the underlying logic of each principle helps you navigate those gray areas.
These ethical principles demonstrate core concepts like client autonomy, professional boundaries, cultural humility, and systems-level advocacy. Exam questions rarely ask you to simply define a principle—they present scenarios where multiple principles compete for priority. Don't just memorize the six core values; know which principle takes precedence in specific situations and why the profession has organized ethics this way.
These six principles form the backbone of the NASW Code of Ethics and represent what makes social work distinct from other helping professions. They're not ranked hierarchically—context determines which takes priority in any given situation.
Compare: Service vs. Social Justice—both focus on helping others, but service emphasizes direct assistance while social justice targets root causes. If an exam asks about advocacy versus direct practice, this distinction matters.
These principles govern the practitioner's behavior and establish the standards that protect both clients and the profession's reputation. Violations here are the most common reasons for licensure complaints.
Compare: Integrity vs. Competence—integrity is about honesty and consistency, while competence is about capability and skill. A practitioner can be deeply honest but still incompetent, or highly skilled but lacking integrity. Exams often test whether you can identify which principle is violated in a scenario.
These principles center the client's agency and establish boundaries around information sharing. They're often in tension with other values, which is exactly what makes them exam favorites.
Compare: Self-Determination vs. Confidentiality—both protect client autonomy, but self-determination governs decisions about their lives while confidentiality governs information about their lives. An FRQ might ask you to analyze a scenario where respecting one principle requires limiting the other.
This principle acknowledges that effective practice requires understanding how identity, culture, and social location shape both client experiences and practitioner blind spots. It's not a separate skill—it's embedded in every other principle.
This isn't a standalone principle but rather the process for navigating conflicts between principles. Expect scenario-based questions that require you to work through this process.
Compare: Self-Determination vs. Duty to Protect—this is the classic ethical tension. When a client's autonomous choices create risk of serious harm, which principle wins? The answer depends on imminence, severity, and specificity of the threat. Master this comparison for licensing exams.
| Concept | Key Principles |
|---|---|
| Client autonomy | Self-Determination, Dignity and Worth, Confidentiality |
| Professional standards | Integrity, Competence |
| Social change focus | Social Justice, Service |
| Information protection | Confidentiality, Privacy |
| Relationship-centered practice | Importance of Human Relationships, Dignity and Worth |
| Working across difference | Cultural Competence, Social Diversity |
| Navigating conflicts | Ethical Decision-Making Process |
| Harm prevention exceptions | Duty to Warn, Mandated Reporting |
A client tells you they plan to stop taking medication against medical advice. Which two principles are in tension, and how would you balance them?
Compare and contrast how the principles of Service and Social Justice would guide your response to a client facing eviction due to discriminatory housing policies.
Your supervisor asks you to provide family therapy, but your training is only in individual counseling. Which principle applies, and what should you do?
A client from a cultural background different from yours requests that family members be included in all sessions. How do Cultural Competence and Self-Determination work together here?
You discover that a colleague has been practicing while impaired. Which principles guide your response, and what steps does the ethical decision-making process require?