Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Environmental art photography sits at the intersection of several critical concepts you'll encounter throughout your study of contemporary art: site-specificity, ephemerality, documentation as artistic practice, and the artist-landscape relationship. When you see these photographers' work on an exam, you're not just being asked to identify who made what—you're being tested on your understanding of how photography functions differently depending on whether it's documenting temporary interventions, revealing industrial impact, or transforming landscapes into commentary.
The artists in this guide represent distinct approaches to capturing human-environment relationships. Some use photography as a preservation tool for works that would otherwise disappear; others wield the camera as an activist instrument to expose ecological damage. Understanding why each artist photographs the landscape—not just what they photograph—will help you tackle comparison questions and FRQs with confidence. Don't just memorize names and famous works; know what conceptual category each artist represents.
These artists create temporary works from natural materials, making photography essential for preserving what nature will soon reclaim. The photograph becomes the lasting artwork while the physical installation returns to the earth.
Compare: Goldsworthy vs. Mendieta—both create ephemeral works from natural materials, but Goldsworthy emphasizes formal geometry while Mendieta centers the human body and personal narrative. If an FRQ asks about different approaches to impermanence, contrast their motivations.
These artists treat movement through nature as the artwork itself, with photography serving to record traces of human presence in vast, often remote environments.
Compare: Long vs. Holt—both engage remote landscapes, but Long leaves temporary traces through walking while Holt constructs permanent structures that frame natural light. Long documents process; Holt documents experience.
These artists alter landscapes at architectural scale, creating temporary spectacles that photography must capture before removal. The documentation becomes the primary way most audiences experience the work.
Compare: Christo and Jeanne-Claude vs. Smithson—both work at monumental scale, but Christo's installations are designed for removal while Smithson's earthworks embrace permanent transformation through natural decay. Both rely on photography for audience access, but with opposite relationships to preservation.
These photographers turn their cameras on landscapes already transformed by human industry, using aesthetic strategies to make viewers confront environmental consequences.
Compare: Burtynsky vs. Maisel—both photograph industrial landscapes, but Burtynsky works from ground level with recognizable scale while Maisel's aerial perspective creates abstraction. Both use beauty strategically, but Maisel pushes further toward non-representational imagery.
These artists explicitly frame photography as a tool for environmental and social commentary, using manipulation or scale to communicate statistical realities.
Compare: Jordan vs. Yao Lu—both create environmental commentary, but Jordan uses documentary accumulation while Yao employs digital manipulation and art-historical reference. Jordan confronts directly; Yao seduces then reveals.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Ephemeral/temporary works | Goldsworthy, Mendieta, Christo and Jeanne-Claude |
| Walking/movement as medium | Long, Holt |
| Monumental earthworks | Smithson, Holt |
| Industrial landscape documentation | Burtynsky, Maisel |
| Aerial perspective | Maisel, Burtynsky |
| Explicit environmental activism | Jordan, Yao Lu |
| Body and identity | Mendieta |
| Digital manipulation | Yao Lu |
Which two artists both create ephemeral works but differ significantly in their use of the human body? What conceptual difference does this reflect?
If an FRQ asks you to discuss photography's role in preserving temporary artworks, which three artists would provide the strongest examples, and why does each need documentation differently?
Compare Burtynsky and Jordan's approaches to environmental photography: how do their strategies for engaging viewers differ, and what does each assume about the relationship between beauty and activism?
Smithson and Christo both created monumental landscape interventions—what fundamental difference in their attitudes toward permanence and decay would you emphasize in a comparison essay?
How does Yao Lu's use of traditional Chinese landscape aesthetics function differently from Maisel's use of abstraction, even though both transform environmental damage into visually compelling images?