upgrade
upgrade

❤️‍🔥Heat and Mass Transfer

Essential Heat Exchanger Designs

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Heat exchangers are the workhorses of thermal systems—you'll encounter them in nearly every engineering application from power plants to your car's radiator. When you're tested on heat transfer, you're not just being asked to name designs; you're being evaluated on whether you understand why certain configurations excel at specific tasks. The underlying principles—surface area enhancement, flow arrangement, turbulence generation, and thermal storage—determine which exchanger fits which application.

Don't just memorize names and descriptions. For each design, know what heat transfer mechanism it exploits, what trade-offs it accepts, and where it shows up in real systems. When an exam question asks you to select or size a heat exchanger, you need to connect the design's geometry to its thermal performance. Master the "why" behind each configuration, and the applications will make intuitive sense.


Flow Arrangement Designs

The direction fluids travel relative to each other fundamentally shapes heat transfer effectiveness. Counter-flow arrangements maximize the temperature gradient along the exchanger length, while cross-flow designs balance performance with practical construction constraints.

Double-Pipe Heat Exchangers

  • Counter-flow or parallel-flow operation—the simplest configuration where one pipe nests inside another, allowing direct control over flow arrangement
  • Low capital cost and easy maintenance make these ideal for pilot plants, small-scale processes, or situations requiring frequent cleaning
  • Limited heat transfer area restricts applications to low duty requirements; multiple units in series can extend capacity but add complexity

Cross-Flow Heat Exchangers

  • Perpendicular fluid streams create intermediate effectiveness between parallel and counter-flow—critical for gas-to-liquid applications where ductwork constraints matter
  • Finned surfaces commonly added to the gas side to compensate for lower gas-side heat transfer coefficients
  • HVAC and refrigeration systems rely heavily on this configuration for air-cooled condensers and evaporators

Compare: Double-pipe vs. cross-flow—both are relatively simple constructions, but double-pipe achieves true counter-flow (higher effectiveness) while cross-flow accepts lower effectiveness for easier air-side integration. If an FRQ asks about automotive radiators or AC condensers, cross-flow is your answer.


Surface Area Enhancement Designs

When you need high heat duty in limited space, geometry becomes your primary tool. These designs pack maximum surface area into minimum volume through creative tube arrangements, plate stacking, or extended surfaces.

Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchangers

  • Tube bundles inside a cylindrical shell provide massive surface area; baffles direct shell-side flow to increase turbulence and heat transfer coefficients
  • High-pressure and high-temperature capability makes this the default choice for power plants, refineries, and chemical processing
  • TEMA standards govern design classifications—understanding BEM, AES, and other type designations helps you specify the right configuration for fouling, thermal expansion, and maintenance needs

Plate Heat Exchangers

  • Corrugated plates create turbulent flow at low Reynolds numbers, achieving heat transfer coefficients 3-5 times higher than shell-and-tube designs
  • Compact footprint with easy capacity expansion—just add plates to increase surface area without redesigning the system
  • Gasket limitations historically restricted use to moderate pressures and temperatures, though brazed and welded variants now handle more demanding conditions

Compact Heat Exchangers

  • Surface area density exceeding 700m2/m3700 \, m^2/m^3 defines this category—achieved through micro-channels, plate-fins, or printed circuit designs
  • Aerospace and automotive applications demand the weight and volume savings these designs provide
  • Advanced materials like aluminum and titanium alloys enable high performance while minimizing mass

Compare: Shell-and-tube vs. plate heat exchangers—both excel at liquid-liquid duty, but shell-and-tube handles extreme conditions (high ΔP\Delta P, high TT, fouling fluids) while plates win on efficiency and footprint for clean, moderate-condition services. Know that plate exchangers dominate food/pharma due to cleanability.


Extended Surface Designs

When one fluid has a much lower heat transfer coefficient than the other (typically gas vs. liquid), adding fins to the low-coefficient side balances thermal resistances and dramatically improves overall performance.

Finned-Tube Heat Exchangers

  • Fins increase effective surface area on the gas side, compensating for air's poor thermal conductivity—fin efficiency ηf\eta_f quantifies how effectively the extended surface conducts heat
  • Forced or natural convection configurations available; forced convection with fans achieves higher heat transfer but adds parasitic power consumption
  • HVAC evaporators and condensers are textbook applications—refrigerant flows inside tubes while air passes over finned exteriors

Spiral Heat Exchangers

  • Single continuous channel per fluid creates true counter-flow in a compact spiral geometry—self-cleaning action from curved flow paths handles fouling fluids well
  • Low pressure drop compared to equivalent shell-and-tube designs improves pumping efficiency
  • Viscous fluids and slurries that would foul or clog other designs flow effectively through spiral channels

Compare: Finned-tube vs. spiral—both address challenging fluids, but finned-tube targets gas-liquid applications (air cooling) while spiral excels at viscous liquid-liquid or slurry services. Spiral's self-cleaning nature makes it ideal for wastewater and pulp/paper industries.


Energy Recovery Designs

These configurations capture waste heat that would otherwise be lost, using thermal storage or cyclic operation to transfer energy between streams that don't flow simultaneously.

Regenerative Heat Exchangers

  • Thermal storage matrix alternately absorbs heat from hot exhaust and releases it to cold inlet air—rotary (Ljungström) and fixed-bed designs dominate industrial applications
  • Effectiveness values above 90% achievable in well-designed systems, dramatically reducing fuel consumption in furnaces and gas turbines
  • Seal leakage between hot and cold streams is the primary design challenge; some mixing is unavoidable in rotary regenerators

Compare: Regenerative vs. recuperative (direct-transfer) exchangers—regenerators use intermediate storage and work well for gas-gas applications with large flow rates, while recuperators transfer heat directly and suit continuous liquid-liquid processes. Power plant air preheaters almost always use regenerative designs.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Counter-flow effectivenessDouble-pipe, spiral
High-pressure/temperature dutyShell-and-tube
Maximum compactnessPlate, compact, spiral
Gas-liquid applicationsFinned-tube, cross-flow
Fouling/viscous fluidsSpiral, shell-and-tube (with cleaning access)
Energy recoveryRegenerative
Food/pharmaceutical (cleanability)Plate
Aerospace/automotive (weight-critical)Compact

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two heat exchanger types achieve true counter-flow operation, and why does this matter for effectiveness?

  2. A chemical plant needs to cool a high-pressure hydrocarbon stream with cooling water. Which design would you recommend, and what specific features make it suitable?

  3. Compare plate and shell-and-tube heat exchangers: what applications favor each, and what are the key trade-offs?

  4. Why do HVAC systems almost universally use finned-tube designs rather than bare tubes? Connect your answer to the concept of thermal resistance.

  5. An FRQ asks you to improve the thermal efficiency of a gas turbine system by recovering exhaust heat. Which heat exchanger category addresses this need, and what design parameter would you optimize?